Thrombotic complications in coronary angioplasty — ionic versus non-ionic lowosmolar contrast media

References

• Andersen P. E., Bolstad B., Berg K. J., Justesen P., Thayssen P., Kloster Y. F. Iodixanol and ioxaglate in cardioangiography. A double-blind randomized phase-3 study. Clin. Radiol. 1993; 48: 268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett B. J., Parfrey P. S., Vavasour H. M., O'Dea P., Stone K. G. E. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992; 326: 431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson P. The clotting issue. Etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents. Invest. Radiol. 1993; 28: 525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz E. W., Wisneski J. A., Miller R., et al. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography. A prospective randomized multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1992; 19: 899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski E. F., Head C., Michelson A. D. Nonionic contrast media. Procoagulants or clotting innocents?. Invest. Radiol. 1993; 28: 512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines C. L., Schreiber T. L., Savas V., et al. A randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellevand T. O., Kløw N. E., Vatne K., et al. Coronary angioplasty using a low osmolar nonionic contrast medium. A retrospective angiographic and clinical evaluation. Acta Radiol. 1995; 36: 54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembo N. J., King S. B., Roubin G. S., Black A. J., Douglas J. S. Effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media on complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am. J. Cardiol. 1991; 67: 1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorstad K., Vatne K., Brodahl U., Laake B., Simonsen S., Aakhus T. Safety of the nonionic contrast medium Omnipaque in coronary angiography. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1989; 12: 98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee M., Scully M., Thomas M., Jewttt D., Kakkar V. The potential thrombogenic action of a nonionic radiographic contrast medium used during coronary angiography is offset by heparin during coronary angioplasty. Thromb. Haemost. 1996; 76: 679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens M. R., Ribes J. A., Marder V. J., Francis C. W. Effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast agents on endothelial cells in vitro. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1992; 199: 315
   Google Scholar
• Piessens J. H., Stammen F., Vrolix M. C., et al. Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary angioplasty. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1993; 28: 99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riemann C. D., Massey C. V., McCarron D. L., Borkowski P., Johnson P. C., Ziskind A. A. Ionic contrast agent-mediated endothelial injury causes increased platelet deposition to vascular surfaces. Am. Heart J. 1993; 125: 71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilvold A., Bjørnsen S., Brosstad F. The effect of various contrast media on the activation of plasminogen by streptokinase or recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in vitro. Invest. Radiol. 1994; 29: 705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormorken H., Sakariassen K. Contrast media effects on hemostatic and thrombotic parameters. Possible consequences for practical techniques and prophylactic measures. Acta Radiol. 1995, Suppl. 399: 173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormorken H., Skalpe I. O., Testart M. C. Effect of various contrast media on coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet function. An in vitro and in vivo study. Invest. Radiol. 1989; 21: 348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacek J. L., Gersema L., Woods M., Bower C., Beauchamp G. Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate. Am. J. Cardiol. 1990; 15: 1277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar