A method for the selective irradiation of part of a genome

References

• Blocher D, Pohlit W. DNA double strand breaks in Erlich ascites tumor cells at low doses of x-rays. II. Can cell death be attributed to double strand breaks? Int J Radiat Biol 1982; 42: 329 38.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan AT, Obe G, van Zeeland AA, Paliti F, Meijers M, Verdegaal-Immerzeel EAM. Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosome aberrations. II. Utilization of neurospora endonuclease for study of aberration production by x-rays in the G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle. Mutat Res 1980; 69: 293 305.
   Google Scholar
• Jeggo PA. Identi cation of genes involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Radiat Res 1998; 150: S80 91.
   Google Scholar
• Roca AI, Cox MM. RecA protein: structure, function, and role in recombinational DNA repair. In: Cohn WE, Moldave K, eds. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1997; 56: 129 223.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick MA, Bennet C, Perkins E, Porter G, Priebe SD. Double-strand breaks and recombinational repair: the role of processing, signalling and DNA homology. In: Wheals AE, Rose AH, Harrison JS, eds. The yeasts, 2nd edn.: Academic Press, London, 1995: 357 410.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton DE, Booz J. A Monte Carlo treatment of the decay of 125I. Radiat Res 1981; 87: 10 23.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton DE. The range of high LET effects from 125I decays. Radiat Res 1986; 107: 163 71.
   Google Scholar
• Martin RF, Haseltine WA. Range of radiochemical damage to DNA with decay of iodine-125. Science 1981; 213: 896 8.
   Google Scholar
• Manuelidis L. Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1985; 71: 288 93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietzel S, Jauch A, Kienle D, et al. Separate and variably shaped chromosome domains are disclosed by chromosome arm painting in human cell nuclei. Chromosome Res 1998; 6: 25 33.
   Google Scholar
• Visser AE, Aten JA. Chromosomes as well as chromosome subdomains constitute distinct units in interphase nuclei. J Cell Sci 1999; 112: 3353 60.
   Google Scholar
• Aten JA, Bakker PJM, Stap J, Boschman GA, Veenhof CHN. DNA double labelling with IdUrd and CldUrd for spatial and temporal analysis of cell proliferation and DNA replication. Histochem J 1992; 24: 251 9.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, � uorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 2934 8.
   Google Scholar
• Savage JRK, Bhunya SP. Cytological sub-division of S-phase in the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Chromosoma 1980; 77: 169 80.
   Google Scholar
• Savage JRK, Prasad R, Papworth DG. Subdivision of S-phase and its use for comparative purposes in cultured human cells. J Theor Biol 1984; 111: 355 67.
   Google Scholar
• Cawood AH. Chromosome replication in broblasts of the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Chromosoma 1981; 83: 711 20.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon MF. Gene action in the X chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 1961; 190: 372 3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willard HF, Latt SA. Analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human X chromosome by � uorescence microscopy. Am J Hum Genet 1976; 28: 213 27.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SJ, Hahn GM, Bagshaw MA. Chromosome aberrations induced by thymidine. Exp Cell Res 1966; 42: 130 5.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Slijepcevic P, Arkesteijn G, Darroudi F, Natarajan AT. Development of DNA libraries speci c for Chinese hamster chromosome 3, 4, 9 10, X and Y by DOP-PCR. Cyto-genet Cell Genet 1996; 75: 57 62.
   Google Scholar
• Fox MH, Read RA, Bedford JS. Comparison of synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells obtained by mitotic shake-off, hydroxyurea, aphidicolin, or methotrexate. Cytometry 1987; 8: 315 20.
   Google Scholar
• Tobay RA, Valdez JG, Crissman HA. Synchronization of human diploid broblasts at multiple stages of the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res 1988; 179: 400 16.
   Google Scholar
• Nelms BE, Maser RS, MacKay JF, Lagally MG, Petrini JHJ. In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human broblasts. Science 1998; 280: 590 2.
   Google Scholar