References
- Tomiak E, Piccart M. Routine follow-up of patients after primary therapy for early breast cancer: changing concepts and challenges for the future. Ann Oncol 1993; 4: 199–204.
- GIVIO Investigators (The Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valu-tazione Interventi Oncologia). Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994; 271: 1587–92.
- Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 1994; 271: 1593–7.
- Tomin R, Donegan WL. Screening for recurrent breast can-cer, its effectiveness and prognostic value. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 62–7.
- Snee M. Follow-up of women treated for breast cancer. Clin Oncol R Coll Radiol 1996; 8: 85–9.
- Schapira DV. Breast cancer surveillance--a cost-effective strategy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 25: 107–11.
- Holli K, Hakama M. Continuity of the doctor/patient rela-tionship during the routine follow-up of a breast cancer patient. Support Care Cancer 1993; 1: 263–5.
- Lampic C, Wennberg A, Schill JE, Brodin O, Glimelius B, *it:len P-0. Anxiety and cancer-related worry of cancer patients at routine follow-up visits. Acta Oncol 1994; 33: 119–25.
- Brada M. Is there a need to follow-up cancer patients? Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 655–7.
- Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, et al. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in a primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized con-trolled trial. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 705–10.
- Avis M, Bond M, Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfac-tion. J Adv Nurs 1995; 22: 316–22.
- Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patient satisfaction: important gen-eral considerations. Br Med J 1991; 302: 887–9.
- Marton F. Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci 1981; 10: 177–200.
- Uljens M. The essence and existence of phenomenography. Nordisk Pedagogik 1993; 3: 134–47.
- Marton F. Phenomenography. In: The International Encyclo-paedia of Education, 2nd ed. London: Pergamon, 1994: 4424–9.
- Marton F, Booth S. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1997.
- Fridlund B, Hildingh C. Qualitative research methods in the service of health. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2000.
- Strömberg B. Professional attitudes of doctors and nurses, a study of conceptions. Goteborg: University of Gothenburg, 1997 (dissertation).
- Morris S, Corder AP, Taylor I. What are the benefits of routine breast cancer follow-up? Postgrad Med J 1992; 68: 904–7.
- Hoskins CN, Baker S, Sherman D, et al. Social support and patterns of adjustment to breast cancer. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 1996; 10: 99–123; (discussion) 125-33.
- Loomer L, Brockschmidt J, Muss H, Saylor G. Postoperative follow-up of patients with early breast cancer. Patterns of care among clinical oncologists and a review of the literature. Cancer 1991; 67: 55–60.
- Muss H, Tell G, Case L, Robertson P, Atwell B. Perceptions of follow-up care in women with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1991; 14: 55–9.
- Meyer L, Aspegren K. Long-term psychological sequel of mastectomy and breast conserving treatment for breast can-cer. Acta Oncol 1989; 28: 13–8.
- Fredette S. Breast cancer survivors: concerns and coping. Cancer Nurs 1995; 18: 35–46.
- Thomas S, Glynne-Jones R, Chait I. Is it worth the wait? A survey of patients' satisfaction with an oncology outpatient clinic. Eur J Cancer Care Engl 1997; 6: 50–8.
- Graydon J, Galloway S, Palmer-Wickham S, et al. Informa-tion needs of women during early treatment for breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 59–64.
- Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23: 487–95.