Image-guidance protocol comparison: Supine and prone set-up accuracy for pelvic radiation therapy

References

• Olofsen-van Acht M, van den Berg H, Quint S, de Boer H, Seven M, van Soemsen de Koste J, et al. Reduction of irradiated small bowel volume and accurate patient positioning by use of a bellyboard device in pelvic radiotherapy of gynecological cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2001; 59: 87–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghosh K, Padilla LA, Murray KP, Downs LS, Carson LF, Dusenbery KE. Using a belly board device to reduce the small bowel volume within pelvic radiation fields in women with postoperatively treated cervical carcinoma. Gyn Oncol 2001; 83: 271–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanahan TG, Mehta MP, Bertelrud KL, Buchler DA, Frank LE, Gehring MA, et al. Minimization of small bowel volume within treatment fields utilizing customized “belly boards”. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19: 469–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkawa M, Gagel B, Demirel C, Schmachtenberg A, Asadpour B, Eble MJ. Dose-volume histogram evaluation of prone and supine patient position in external beam radiotherapy for cervical and endometrial cancer. Radiother Oncol 2003; 69: 99–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adli M, Mayr NA, Kaiser HS, Skwarchuk MW, Meeks SL, Mardirossian G, et al. Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer?. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 230–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelbl O, Richter S, Flentje M. Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic radiation: A prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45: 1193–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley AJ, Catton CN, Haycocks T, Kelly V, Alasti H, Bristow R, et al. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004; 70: 37–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentel GC, Munley MT, Marks LB, Anscher MS. The effect of pressure from the table top and patient position on pelvic organ location in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 247–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitamura K, Shirato H, Seppenwoolde Y, Onimaru R, Oda M, Fujita K, et al. Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 1117–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber DC, Nouet P, Rouzaud M, Miralbell R. Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 365–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boer HC, van Soernsen de Koste JR, Creutzberg CL, Visser AG, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ. Electronic portal image assisted reduction of systematic set-up errors in head and neck irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2001; 61: 299–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss M, Shi C, Papanikolaou. Tomotherapeutic stereotactic body radiation therapy: Techniques and comparison between modalities. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 953–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 938–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson LA, Sharpe MB. Image-guided radiotherapy: Rationale, benefits, and limitations. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 848–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah AP, Langen KM, Ruchala KJ, Cox A, Kupelian PA, Meeks SL. Patient dose from megavoltage computed tomography imaging. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70: 1579–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupelian PA, Lee C, Langen KM, Zeidan OA, Manon RR, Willoughby TR, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance strategies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70: 1151–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HC, Heijmen BJ. A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient set-up errors with minimal portal imaging workload. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 1350–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HC, van Os MJ, Jansen PP, Heijmen BJ. Application of the no action level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 969–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HC, Heijmen BJ. eNAL: An extension of the NAL set-up correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 1586–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herk M. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007; 17: 258–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar