Diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast abdominal CT scans performed as follow-up for patients with an established cancer diagnosis: a retrospective study

References

• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumerreports.org [Internet]. The surprising dangers of CT scans and X-rays. Patients are often exposed to cancer-causing radiation for little medical reason, a Consumer Reports investigation finds; 2015 Jan 27 [cited 2017 Jun 1]. Available from: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2015/01/the-surprising-dangers-of-ct-sans-and-x-rays/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Park SY, Park BK, Park JJ, et al. CT sensitivities for large (≥3cm) adrenal adenoma and cortical carcinoma. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:310–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patz EF Jr, Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, et al. Lung cancer staging and management: comparison of contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced helical CT of the thorax. Radiology. 1999;212:56–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadigh G, Applegate KE, Baumgarten DA. Comparative accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT versus noncontrast CT plus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterization of patients with hypervascular liver metastases: a critically appraised topic. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafor DH, Frederick MG, Paulson EK, et al. Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:961–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patient Safety: Radiation Dose in X-Ray and CT Exams. American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America (April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–2086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251:175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR.org [Internet]. ACR manual on contrast media, v10.3. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Katzberg RW. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity. Radiology. 1997;204:297–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee FT, Jr, Caroline DF, Thornbury JR, et al. A randomized comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in adult body computed tomography scanning. Acad Radiol. 1996;3(suppl 3):S500–S506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990;175:621–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsafi A, Alsafi Z, Lakhani A, et al. Changes in renal function in elderly patients following intravenous iodinated contrast administration: a retrospective study. Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:459583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Ellis JH. Contrast media controversies in 2015: imaging patients with renal impairment or risk of contrast reaction. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:1174–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memolo M, Dyer R, Zagoria RJ. Extravasation injury with nonionic contrast material [letter]. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:203–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell AM, Jones AE, Tumlin JA, et al. Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicola R, Shaqdan KW, Aran K, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy: identifying the risks, choosing the right agent, and reviewing effective prevention and management methods. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015;44(6):501–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose TA Jr, Choi JW. Intravenous imaging contrast media complications: the basics that every clinician needs to know. Am J Med. 2015;128:943–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild HH, Kuhl CK, Hübner-Steiner U, et al. Adverse events after unenhanced and monomeric and dimeric contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Radiology. 2006;240:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, et al. Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson HM, Doria AS, Moineddin R, et al. The brain in children: is contrast enhancement really needed after obtaining normal unenhanced CT results? Radiology. 2007;244:838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu YH, Chen JD, Wang SH, et al. Whether intravenous contrast is necessary for CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult ED patients? Acad Radiol. 2013;20:73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang IK, Lee YS, Kim J, et al. Do we really need additional contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography for differential diagnosis in triage of middle-aged subjects with suspected biliary pain? Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa M, Tatsuya K, Miyamoto Y, et al. Noncontrast and contrast enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: a retrospective study for the usefulness. J Radiol Case Rep. 2009;3:26–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, et al. National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology. 2011;258:164–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995;194:789–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou SM, Bentel GC, Lee CG, et al. Differences in gross target volumes on contrast vs. noncontrast CT scans utilized for conformal radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42:73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar