Data quality in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study

References

• Armstrong BK. The role of the cancer registry in cancer control. Cancer Causes Control. 1992;3:569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM. The role of cancer registries in cancer control. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WL, Kasl S, Flannery JT, et al. The accuracy of prostate cancer staging in a population-based tumor register and its impact on the black-white stage difference (Connecticut, United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6:425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polissar L, Feigl P, Lane WW, et al. Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984;72:1007–1014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izquierdo JN, Schoenbach VJ. The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:695–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon DJ, Williams EM. Data quality in population-based cancer registration: an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:667–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Chen VW, Ferlay J, et al. Comparability and quality control in cancer registration. Technical Report No 19. Lyon: International Agency for Research On Cancer, World Health Organization and International Association of Cancer Registries; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer register: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:47–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer register: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:56–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regionala Cancercentrum i Samverkan [Internet]. Stockholm. 2016 [cited 2017 March 15]. Swedish. Available from: http://www.cancercentrum.se/samverkan/cancerdiagnoser/gynekologi/kvalitetsregister/
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, et al. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24:659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, et al. The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson B, Wallgren A. Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23:305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al, editors. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Geneva: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al, editors. International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O). 3rd ed, First revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat J. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alektiar K, Abu-Rustum N, Fleming G. Cancer of the uterine body. In: DeVita VT Jr, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. p. 1048–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Silverberg SG. Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers J, Nicewander W. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am Statistician. 1988;42:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh M. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen I, Småstuen M, Johannesen T, et al. Data quality at the cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1218–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:194–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venermo M, Lees T. International Vascunet validation of the Swedvasc Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:802–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg J, Gelfand HM, Levy PS. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinonen M, Miettinen J, Heikinen S, et al. Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2017;77:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomic K, Sandin F. Wigertz A, et al. Evaluation of data quality in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regionala Cancercentrum i Samverkan [Internet]. Stockholm. 2016 [cited 2017 April 3]. Swedish. Available from: https://www.cancercentrum.se/globalassets/cancerdiagnoser/brost/kvalitetsregister/rapport_master_validering_brostregister2015-10-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linder G, Lindblad M, Djerf P, et al. Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1326–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Påhlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, et al. The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1285–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström P, Rutegård J, Haapamäki M, et al. Arterial ligation in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a validation study of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:892–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, et al. Validity of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry for patients treated with major abdominal surgery between 1995 and 1997. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1707–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti R, Schmidtmann I, Sacchetto L, et al. Completeness and timeliness: cancer registries could/should improve their performance. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1091–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar