Determinants of variable resource use for multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care

References

• Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Dake M, et al. The effects of a multidisciplinary care conference on the quality and cost of care for lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1834–1838, discussion 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades J, Remue E, van Hoof E, et al. Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy. 2015;119:464–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine R, Wallace I, Nic a’Bhaird C, et al. Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study. Health Serv Delivery Res. 2014;2:37.
   Google Scholar
• Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, et al. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11:239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, et al. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:935–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Comparisons of cancer care quality and efficiency. March 15, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• [Internet]. http://www.cancercentrum.se/samverkan/vara-uppdrag/kunskapsstyrning/kvalitetsregister/.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell ML, Prabhu Das I, Clauser S, et al. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:72–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamb B, Green JS, Vincent C, et al. Decision making in surgical oncology. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Sweden. Cancer incidence in Sweden 2015. Stockholm: Official Statistics of Sweden; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Database of wages [Internet]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 2015. Available from: http://www.scb.se/.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Restivo L, Apostolidis T, Bouhnik AD, et al. Patients’ non-medical characteristics contribute to collective medical decision-making at multidisciplinary oncological team meetings. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simcock R, Heaford A. Costs of multidisciplinary teams in cancer are small in relation to benefits. BMJ. 2012;344:e2718.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kane B, Luz S, O’Briain DS, et al. Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments. BMC Med. 2007;5:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosker CJ, Dodwell D. The cost of the MDT. BMJ. 2010;340:c951.
   Google Scholar
• Oxenberg J, Papenfuss W, Esemuede I, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences for gastrointestinal malignancies result in measureable treatment changes: a prospective study of 149 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1533–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Faragher I. Not all patients need to be discussed in a colorectal cancer MDT meeting. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao K, Manya K, Azad A, et al. Uro-oncology multidisciplinary meetings at an Australian tertiary referral centre–impact on clinical decision-making and implications for patient inclusion. BJU Int. 2014;114(Suppl. 1):50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaert JA, van Dijk WA, Fiocco M, et al. Nationwide outcomes measurement in colorectal cancer surgery: improving quality and reducing costs. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:19–29.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotman J, Trinh J, Kwan YL, et al. Formalising multidisciplinary peer review: developing a hematological malignancy-specific electronic proforma and standard operating procedureto facilitate procedural efficacy and evidence-based clinical practice. Intern Med J. 2017;47:542–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar