Treatment of advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer with new targeted agents in combination with endocrine therapy: a review of efficacy and tolerability based on available randomized trials on everolimus, ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib

References

• Perez EA. Treatment strategies for advanced hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer: the role of treatment order. Drug Resist Updat. 2016;24:13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L, et al. ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)dagger. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1871–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurebayashi J. Endocrine-resistant breast cancer: underlying mechanisms and strategies for overcoming resistance. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:112–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osborne CK, Schiff R. Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:233–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneterre J, Thürlimann B, Robertson JFR, et al. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women: results of the tamoxifen or arimidex randomized group efficacy and tolerability study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3748–3757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabholtz JM, Buzdar A, Pollak M, et al. Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of a North American multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3758–3767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paridaens RJ, Dirix LY, Beex LV, et al. Phase III study comparing exemestane with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4883–4890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y, et al. Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the international letrozole breast cancer group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2101–2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata H, Masuda N, Ohno S, et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of exemestane versus anastrozole for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal Japanese women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2997–3005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryfonidis K, Zardavas D, Katzenellenbogen BS, et al. Endocrine treatment in breast cancer: cure, resistance and beyond. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;50:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenzano A, Kurian S, Abraham J. Overcoming endocrine resistance in breast cancer: role of the PI3K and the mTOR pathways. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13:143–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller TW, Hennessy BT, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Hyperactivation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase promotes escape from hormone dependence in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:2406–2413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue W, Fan P, Wang J, et al. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone-dependent breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;106:102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulay A, Rudloff J, Ye J, et al. Dual inhibition of mTOR and estrogen receptor signaling in vitro induces cell death in models of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5319–5328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca A, Schirone A, Maltoni R, et al. Progress with palbociclib in breast cancer: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017;9:83–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidula N, Rugo HS. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer: a review of preclinical and clinical data. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016;16:8–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt AJ, McNeil CM, Musgrove EA, et al. Downstream targets of growth factor and oestrogen signalling and endocrine resistance: the potential roles of c-Myc, cyclin D1 and cyclin E. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12: S47–S59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring L, Bardia A, Modi S. Targeting the cyclin d-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-retinoblastoma pathway with selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: rationale, current status, and future directions. Discov Med. 2016;21:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves CL, Elias D, Lyng M, et al. High CDK6 protects cells from fulvestrant-mediated apoptosis and is a predictor of resistance to fulvestrant in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5514–5526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbert LM, Cai S, Lin X, et al. Preclinical characterization of the CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219: in-vivo cell cycle-dependent/independent anti-tumor activities alone/in combination with gemcitabine. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32:825–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn RS, Dering J, Conklin D, et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachelot T, Bourgier C, Cropet C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2718–2724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:520–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1738–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1925–1936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:425–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2875–2884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3638–3646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccart M, Hortobagyi GN, Campone M, et al. Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2dagger. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2357–2362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis LM, Bernstein DS, Voest EE, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Perspective: raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1277–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, et al. Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:vii11–vii19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falagas ME, Karagiannis AK, Nakouti T, et al. Compliance with once-daily versus twice or thrice-daily administration of antibiotic regimens: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte F, Bookhart BK, Nelson WW, et al. Impact of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among patients with venous thromboembolism. Patient. 2013;6:213–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar