RBE for proton radiation therapy – a Nordic view in the international perspective

References

• PTCOG. Facilities in operation [Internet]. Villigen (Switzerland): Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group; 2020 [cited 2020 June 30]. Available from: https://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-in-operation
   Google Scholar
• PTCOG. Facilities under construction [Internet]. Villigen (Switzerland): Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group; 2020 [cited 2020 June 30]. Available from: https://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-under-construction
   Google Scholar
• Suit H, DeLaney T, Goldberg S, et al. Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation treatment of cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRU. Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. Bethesda (MD): International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 2007. (ICRU Report 78).
   Google Scholar
• Dasu A, Toma-Dasu I. Impact of variable RBE on proton fractionation. Med Phys. 2013;40:011705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganetti H. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R419–R472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins RB. A microdosimetric-kinetic model of cell death from exposure to ionizing radiation of any LET, with experimental and clinical applications. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69:739–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz M, Kellerer AM, Kraft-Weyrather W, et al. Computation of cell survival in heavy ion beams for therapy. The model and its approximation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1997;36:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovic L, Brahme A, Furusawa Y, et al. Radiobiological description of the LET dependence of the cell survival of oxic and anoxic cells irradiated by carbon ions. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabe-Fernandez A, Dale RG, Jones B. The incorporation of the concept of minimum RBE (RBEmin) into the linear-quadratic model and the potential for improved radiobiological analysis of high-LET treatments. Int J Radiat Biol. 2007;83(1):27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedenberg M, Lind BK, Hardemark B. A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter alpha/beta of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(3):580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara AL, Schuemann J, Paganetti H. A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:8399–8416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorvik E, Thornqvist S, Stokkevag CH, et al. A phenomenological biological dose model for proton therapy based on linear energy transfer spectra. Med Phys. 2017;44:2586–2594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedenberg M, Toma-Dasu I. Disregarding RBE variation in treatment plan comparison may lead to bias in favor of proton plans. Med Phys. 2014;41:091706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödén J, Toma-Dasu I, Eriksson K, et al. The influence of breathing motion and a variable relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy of left-sided breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(11):1428–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen J, Petersen JBB, Stokkevag CH, et al. Biological dose and complication probabilities for the rectum and bladder based on linear energy transfer distributions in spot scanning proton therapy of prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(11):1413–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly N, Johansson J, Isacsson U, et al. The influence of RBE variations in a clinical proton treatment plan for a hypopharynx cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(12):2765–2777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan R, Peeler CR, Guan F, et al. Radiobiological issues in proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(11):1367–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willers H, Allen A, Grosshans D, et al. Toward a variable RBE for proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128(1):68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, et al. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2019;46(3):e53–e78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez A, Rompokos V, Li K, et al. The impact of proton LET/RBE modeling and robustness analysis on base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma proton plans relative to VMAT. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(12):1765–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CC, McNamara AL, Shin J, et al. End-of-range radiobiological effect on rib fractures in patients receiving proton therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107(3):449–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp B, Jensen MF, Mein S, et al. FRoG: an independent dose and LETd prediction tool for proton therapy at ProBeam® facilities. Med Phys. 2020. DOI:10.1002/mp.14417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas-Kogan D, Indelicato D, Paganetti H, et al. National Cancer Institute workshop on proton therapy for children: considerations regarding brainstem injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101:152–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones B. Towards achieving the full clinical potential of proton therapy by inclusion of LET and RBE models. Cancers. 2015;7(1):460–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödén J, Toma-Dasu I, Witt-Nyström P, et al. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors. Med Phys. 2020;47(2):342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach J, Botas P, Giantsoudi D, et al. Reoptimization of intensity modulated proton therapy plans based on linear energy transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):1097–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjaera LF, Li Z, Ytre-Hauge KS, et al. Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(6):763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint L, Indelicato DJ, Holgersen KS, et al. Towards proton arc therapy: physical and biologically equivalent doses with increasing number of beams in pediatric brain irradiation. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(10):1451–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon SJ, Paganetti H, Prise KM. LET-weighted doses effectively reduce biological variability in proton radiotherapy planning. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(22):225009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödén J, Eriksson K, Toma-Dasu I. Incorporation of relative biological effectiveness uncertainties into proton plan robustness evaluation. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(6):769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Lopez-Aguirre M, Dolcet Llerena A, et al. MultiRBE: treatment planning for protons with selective radiobiological effectiveness. Med Phys. 2019;46(9):4276–4284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch AF, Landry G, Kamp F, et al. Quantification of the uncertainties of a biological model and their impact on variable RBE proton treatment plan optimization. Phys Med. 2017;36:91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langendijk JA, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D, et al. Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: the model-based approach. Radiother Oncol. 2013;107(3):267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödén J, Eriksson K, Toma-Dasu I. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2017;44(3):810–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traneus E, Ödén J. Introducing proton track-end objectives in intensity modulated proton therapy optimization to reduce linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness in critical structures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103(3):747–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager M, Toma-Dasu I, Kirk M, et al. Linear energy transfer painting with proton therapy: a means of reducing radiation doses with equivalent clinical effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(5):1057–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ödén J, Hahn C, Vestergaard A, et al. INSPIRE: A multi-centric study to harmonize linear energy transfer (LET) calculations for biological assessments of proton therapy plans. [Abstract] Joint AAPM/COMP Meeting 2020 WE-B-TRACK 3–3.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom H, Jensen MF, Nystrom PW. Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years? Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1107):20190304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini J, Maes D, Egan A, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(19):7659–7681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar D, Tran LT, Meijers A, et al. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(2):025006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newpower M, Patel D, Bronk L, et al. Using the proton energy spectrum and microdosimetry to model proton relative biological effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(2):316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolet A, Baratto‐Roldán A, Cortés‐Giraldo MA, et al. Segment‐averaged LET concept and analytical calculation from microdosimetric quantities in proton radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2019;46(9):4204–4214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolet A, Cortés‐Giraldo MA, Souris K, et al. Calculation of clinical dose distributions in proton therapy from microdosimetry. Med Phys. 2019;46(12):5816–5823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar