Patient and public involvement in oesophageal cancer survivorship research

References

• Turk ABA, Locock LA. Researcher’s Guide to Patient and Public Involvement. Oxford2017 [cited 2021 6 September]. Available from: https://oxfordbrc.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/A-Researchers-Guide-to-PPI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, et al. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):240–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research 2012. [cited 2021 Jan 28].
   Google Scholar
• Hoven E, Eriksson L, Mansson D'Souza A, et al. What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vat LE, Finlay T, Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar T, et al. Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: a literature review. Health Expect. 2020;23(1):5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):661–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Research Authority. Public involvement: The National Health Service England; 2021. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/public-involvement/.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker JC, Ricci-Cabello I, Parker A, et al. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;363:k4738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, et al. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppila JH, Mattsson F, Brusselaers N, et al. Prognosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma following surgery and no surgery in a nationwide swedish cohort study. Bmj Open. 2018;8(5):e021495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Cancer survival in England - adults diagnosed 2019. [Jun 27, 2021]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/datasets/cancersurvivalratescancersurvivalinenglandadultsdiagnosed.
   Google Scholar
• Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–2396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa M, Valente S, Alfieri R, et al. Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(42):4660–4674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schandl A, Lagergren J, Johar A, et al. Health-related quality of life 10 years after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovative Medicine Initiative. Patient engagement in medicines development: Recommendations on how to find the right match for the right patient engagement activity: Patients active in research and dialogue for an improved generation of medicines (PARADIGM); 2020. [cited 2021 April 23]. Available from: https://imi-paradigm.eu/PEtoolbox/identification-of-patient-representatives.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schandl A, Johar A, Anandavadivelan P, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(6):613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin L, Lagergren J, Lindblad M, et al. Malnutrition after oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden. Br J Surg. 2007;94(12):1496–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ludwig C, Graham ID, Gifford W, et al. Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lagergren P, Johar A, Liu Y, et al. Severe reflux and symptoms of anxiety and depression after esophageal cancer surgery. Cancer Nurs. 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Pettersson E, Schandl A, et al. Psychological distress after esophageal cancer surgery and the predictive effect of dispositional optimism: a nationwide population-based longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;5(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schandl A, Malberg K, Johar A, et al. Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic and health-related quality of life among esophageal cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(8):1011–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Pettersson E, Schandl A, et al. Higher dispositional optimism predicts better Health-Related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery: a nationwide Population-Based longitudinal study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7196–7205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Schandl A, Markar S, et al. Psychological distress and health-related quality of life up to 2 years after oesophageal cancer surgery: nationwide population-based study. BJS Open. 2021;5(1):zraa038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie SH, Santoni G, Malberg K, et al. Prediction model of long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):933–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagergren P, Johar A, Rosenlund H, et al. Severe reflux, sleep disturbances, and health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15(6):818–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler J, Ryll B, di Priolo SL, et al. Improving patient involvement in medicines research and development: a practical roadmap. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51(5):612–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffett L. Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017;150:113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray KN, Miller E. Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6(4):375–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4(2):133–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borup G, Bach KF, Schmiegelow M, et al. A paradigm shift towards patient involvement in medicines development and regulatory science: Workshop proceedings and commentary. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50(3):304–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitan B, Getz K, Eisenstein EL, et al. Assessing the financial value of patient engagement: a quantitative approach from CTTI's patient groups and clinical trials project. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52(2):220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn S, McLachlan S, Jowett S, et al. The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar