388
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE COMMENTARY: CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Comparing treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma: the value of network meta-analyses

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, &
Page 495 | Received 29 Dec 2021, Accepted 29 Dec 2021, Published online: 11 Jan 2022

References

  • Rizzo A, Brandi G. Radiofrequency ablation, radiation therapy, transarterial chemoembolization, and yttrium 90: no differences for local treatment of liver cancer? Acta Oncologica. 2021.
  • Chow R, Simone CB 2nd, Jairam MP, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs radiation therapy vs transarterial chemoembolization vs yttrium 90 for local treatment of liver cancer – a systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival data. Acta Oncologica. 2021;1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.2009563
  • Efthimiou O, White IR. The dark side of the force: multiplicity issues in network meta-analysis and how to address them. Res Synth Methods. 2020;11(1):105–122.
  • Imberger G, Thorlund K, Gluud C, et al. False-positive findings in cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011890.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.