Accuracy of stopping power ratio calculation and experimental validation of proton range with dual-layer computed tomography

References

• Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41(1):111–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taasti VT, Baumer C, Dahlgren CV, et al. Inter-centre variability of CT-based stopping-power prediction in particle therapy: survey-based evaluation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;6:25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li B, Lee H, Duan X, et al. Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(17):7056–7074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moyers MF, Miller DW, Bush DA, et al. Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(5):1429–1438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paganetti H. Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(11):R99–R117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang M, Virshup G, Clayton J, et al. Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(5):1343–1362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li H, Zhang XD, Park P, et al. Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(3):367–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Voort S, van de Water S, Perko Z, et al. Robustness recipes for minimax robust optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(1):163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Elmpt W, Landry G, Das M, et al. Dual energy CT in radiotherapy: current applications and future outlook. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119(1):137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourque AE, Carrier J-F, Bouchard H. A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(8):2059–2088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su K-H, Kuo J-W, Jordan DW, et al. Machine learning-based dual-energy CT parametric mapping. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(12):125001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudobivnik N, Schwarz F, Johnson T, et al. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images. Med Phys. 2016;43(1):495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlfahrt P, Mohler C, Richter C, et al. Evaluation of stopping-power prediction by dual- and single-energy computed tomography in an anthropomorphic ground-truth phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100(1):244–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlfahrt P, Mohler C, Stutzer K, et al. Dual-energy CT based proton range prediction in head and pelvic tumor patients. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125(3):526–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bär E, Lalonde A, Zhang R, et al. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples. Med Phys. 2018;45(1):48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taasti V, Michalak GJ, Hansen DC, et al. Validation of proton stopping power ratio estimation based on dual energy CT using fresh tissue samples. Phys Med Biol. 2017;63(1):015012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TRC. Dual-energy CT: general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199*(5 Suppl):S3–S8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua C, Shapira N, Merchant TE, et al. Accuracy of electron density, effective atomic number, and iodine concentration determination with a dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography system. Med Phys. 2018;45(6):2486–2497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faller FK, Mein S, Ackermann B, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of dual-layer spectral computed tomography-based stopping power prediction for particle therapy planning at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(9):095007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landry G, Dorringer F, Si-Mohamed S, et al. Technical note: relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography. Med Phys. 2019;46(4):1821–1828.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saito M. Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship. Med Phys. 2012;39(4):2021–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Penfold SN. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 2016;43(6):2845–2854.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niepel KB, Stanislawski M, Wuerl M, et al. Animal tissue-based quantitative comparison of dual-energy CT to SPR conversion methods using high-resolution gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(7):075009.
   Google Scholar