Recurrence rate after radical prostatectomy following primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomykala KL, Farolfi A, Hadaschik B, et al. Molecular imaging for primary staging of prostate cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49(4):271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata Y, Tatsugami K, Yoshikawa M, et al. Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2018;25(3):284–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg S, Jochumsen MR, Ulhøi BP, et al. Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary lymph node and distant metastasis NM staging of High-Risk prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(2):214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briganti A, Chun FK-H, Salonia A, et al. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2006;98(4):788–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Solnes LB, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer: an update on important pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49(4):255–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe SP, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, et al. PSMA-RADS version 1.0: a step towards standardizing the interpretation and reporting of PSMA-targeted PET imaging studies. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):485–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna AR: A language and environment for statistical computing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pyka T, Okamoto S, Dahlbender M, et al. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and (68)Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(12):2114–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donswijk ML, van Leeuwen PJ, Vegt E, et al. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, et al. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):918–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamitani R, Matsumoto K, Kosaka T, et al. Evaluation of gleason grade group 5 in a contemporary prostate cancer grading system and literature review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021;19(1):69–75.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The will rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(25):1604–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar