Understanding quality data correctly: a randomized comparison of presentation formats among cancer patients and relatives

References

• Williams KE, Sansoni J, Morris D, et al. A Delphi study to develop indicators of cancer patient experience for quality improvement. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(1):129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Weert JCM, Alblas MC, van Dijk L, et al. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(1):109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anell A, Hagberg O, Liedberg F, et al. A randomized comparison between league tables and funnel plots to inform health care decision-making. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):816–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin JM, Hirota LK, Bond BE, et al. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Høeg BL, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Skaarup JA, et al. Whose perspective is it anyway? Dilemmas of patient involvement in the development of a randomized clinical trial – a qualitative study. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(5):634–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper C, et al. Credibility and the 'professionalized’ lay expert: reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research. Health (London). 2012;16(6):602–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademakers J, Nijman J, Brabers AE, et al. The relative effect of health literacy and patient activation on provider choice in The Netherlands. Health Policy. 2014;114(2–3):200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbel B, Gillespie C, Raven MC. Presenting quality data to vulnerable groups: charts, summaries or behavioral economic nudges? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19(3):161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUHPE. IUHPE position statement on health literacy: a practical vision for a health literate world. Paris: IUHPE Global Working Group on Health Literacy; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Høeg BL, Frederiksen MH, Andersen EAW, et al. Is the health literacy of informal caregivers associated with the psychological outcomes of breast cancer survivors? J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15(5):729–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen EYN, Knight T, Ricciardelli LA, et al. Health literacy of caregivers of adult care recipients: a systematic scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(2):e191–e206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.rkkp.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen E, Larsson H, Nørgaard M, et al. The Danish bladder cancer database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:439–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller S, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, et al. The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(4):506–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen AC, Søgaard M, Mehnert F, et al. The database of the Danish Renal Cancer Group. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:725–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen E, Rasmussen TR. The Danish lung cancer registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:537–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen SM, Bjørn SF, Jochumsen KM, et al. Danish gynecological cancer database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E. Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):874–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wångdahl JM, Mårtensson LI. Measuring health literacy – the Swedish Functional Health Literacy scale. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(1):165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson LI, Wångdahl JM. S-FHL scale for functional health literacy – Swedish version. Guidelines for Use of the Scale. Sweden: Uppsala University and University of Gothenburg; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hildon Z, Allwood D, Black N. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(1):55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffery KJ, Dixon A, Hayen A, et al. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(4):532–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak JG, Hartzler AL, Macleod LC, et al. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(3):448–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JH, Peters E. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:413–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzman ET, Greene J. Effective presentation of health care performance information for consumer decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damman OC, De Jong A, Hibbard JH, et al. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(11):860–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Damman OC, et al. Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meppelink CS, Smit EG, Buurman BM, et al. Should We be afraid of simple messages? The effects of text difficulty and illustrations in people with low or high health literacy. Health Commun. 2015;30(12):1181–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JH, Peters E, Slovic P, et al. Making health care quality reports easier to use. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001;27(11):591–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters E. Beyond comprehension: the role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R. Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):444–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vromans RD, van Eenbergen MC, Geleijnse G, et al. Exploring cancer survivor needs and preferences for communicating personalized cancer statistics from registry data: qualitative multimethod study. JMIR Cancer. 2021;7(4):e25659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.statistikbanken.dk/HFUDD11. Statistics Denmark; [22-04-2022].
   Google Scholar