COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF A COLLAGEN DRESSING AND A POLYURETHANE DRESSING ON THE HEALING OF SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT (STSG) DONOR SITES

References

• Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglestein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen syn-thesis and re-epithelialisation in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 1983; 35: 142–148.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyama H, Yokoo K, Kamei Y et al. A comparison of moist and dry wound healing in burn treatment. (Abstr.) Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Society for Burn Injuries, Paris, June 4–7,1994: 112.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood Al. Calcium alginate dressing acceler-ates split skin pun donor site healing. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 373–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bettinger D, Humphries Y. Evaluation of calcium alginate for skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 59–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biltz H, Kiessling M, Kreysel HW. Comparison of hydrocolloid dressing and saline gauze in the treatment of skin graft donor sites. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88.1985: 125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Cadier MA, Clarke JA. Dermasorb versus Jelonet in patients with burns skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 246–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champsaur A, Amadou R, Nefzi A et al. Use of Duoderm on donor sites after skin grafting. A comparative study with Tulle-gras. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88.1985: 128–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dover R, Otto WR, Nanchahal J et al. Toxicity testing of wound dressing materials in vitro. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48: 230–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eloy R, Baguet J, Christe G et al. An in vitro evaluation of the hemostatic activity of topical agents. J Biomed Mater Res 1988; 22: 149–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erasmus ME, Jonkman MF. Water vapour permeance: a meaningful measure for water vapour permeability of wound coverings. Burns 1989; 15: 371–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulk WP, Mathews R, Stevens PJ et al. Human amniotic membrane as an adjunct in wound healing. Lancet 1980; i: 1156–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman DL, Karpinski RHS. A prospective trial comparing biobrane, duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 173: 1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao ZR, Hao ZQ, Li Y et al. Porcine dermal collagen as a wound dressing for skin donor sites and deep partial skin thickness burns. Burns 1992; 18: 492–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griswold JA, Cepica T, Rossi L et al. A comparison of xeroform and skin temp dressings in the healing of skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 136–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansbrough JF. Use of Biobrane for extensive posterior donor site wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 335–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horch R, Bannasch H, Andree C et al. Fibrin glue as a carrier for cultured human keratinocytes versus cultured epidermal skin grafts in athymic mice full-thickness wounds. In: Stark GB, Horch R, Tanczos E, eds. Biological matrices and wound regeneration. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997: 68–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ihlberg L, Haukipuro K, Risteli L et al. Collagen synthesis in intact skin is suppressed during wound healing. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 397–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James JH, Watson ACH. The use of OpSite, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 1975; 28: 107–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karasek M, Charlton ME. Growth of postem-bryonic skin epithelial cells on collagen forms an extended network of anchoring fibrils. J Invest Dermatol 1971; 56: 205–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees V, Ilyas S, Reid CD. A comparison of the use of polythene sheet and Jelonet as temporary dressings for excised wounds. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44:612–614.
   Google Scholar
• Leight P. Sim E, Sorensen B. Treatment of donor sites-Duoderm or Omniderm? Burns 1989; 15: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Madden MR, Finkelstein JL, Hefton JM et al. Optimal healing of donor site wounds with hydrocolloid dressings. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88. 1985: 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL et al. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma 1989; 29: 924–927.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter JM:. A comparative investigation of re-epithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 333–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A et al. The validation of visual analogue scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond JD, Sutherland ABA. A new approach to the problems encountered with Op Site as a donor site dressing: systemic ethamsylate. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39: 516–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson MC, Krizek TJ, Koss N et al. Amniotic membranes as a temporary wound dressing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973; 136: 904–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawada Y, Yotsuyanagi T, Sone K. A silicone sheet dressing containing an antimicrobial agent for split thickness donor site wounds. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43: 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DJ, Thompson PD, Bolton LL et al. Microbiology and healing of the occluded skin-pun donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 1094–1097.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tavis MJ, Harney JH, Thornton JW et al. Modified collagen membrane as a skin substitute. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 285–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teh BT. Why do skin grafts fail? Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen P. Comparison of calcium sodium alginate (Kaltostat) and porcine xenograft (E-Z-Derm) in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Burns 1992; 18: 145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995; 21: 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Barisoni D, Armato U. An investigation into the mechanism by which human dermis does not significantly contribute to the rejection of allo-skin grafts. Burns 1995; 21: 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Germain L, Goudet F et al. Permanent grafting of living skin substitutes: surgical parameters to control for successful results. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 7–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar