CONTRACTION AND MYOFIBROBLASTS IN RESTORED SKIN

References

• Abercrombie M, Flint MH, James DW. Wound contraction in relation to collagen formation in scorbutic guinea pigs. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1956; 4: 167–175.
   Google Scholar
• Aki FE, Andrade ACH, Lourenc,o LA, Misawa HTA, Mariani U, Ferreira MC. Retrac,Co prima'ria dos enxertos de pele. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1991; 46: 148–151.
   Google Scholar
• Alves VAF, Srouge M, Santos RTM, Yamamoto LU, Gayotto LCC, Arap S. Detecc,Co imuno-histoqu'imica de ant'igenos de superfi'cie ABH em carcinoma de ce'lulas transicionais da bexiga-descric,Co do me'todo e comparac,Co com a histo-logia cla'ssica. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia 1986; 32: 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baur PS. Myofibroblasts: their attachments and consequences in human burn wounds, granula-tion tissues, and scars. J Burn Care Rehabil 1982; 3: 214–219.
   Google Scholar
• Baur PS, Parks DH. The myofibroblast anchoring strand-the fibronectin connection in wound healing and the possible loci of collagen fibril assembly. J Trauma 1983; 23: 853–862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker H. Subdermal liposuction to enhance skin contraction: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 28: 479–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendlin A, Linares HA, Benain F. Tratado de quemaduras. Cidade do Me'xico: Interamerican-McGraw, 1993: 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JB, McDowell F. Epithelial healing and transplantation of skin. Ann Surg 1942; 115: 1166–1181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Sharpe DT, Naylor IL, Chander CL, Cross SE. The role of the contractile fibroblast in the capsules around tissue expanders and implants. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46: 547–556.
   Google Scholar
• Compton CC, Gill JM, Bradford DA, Regauer S, Gallico GG, O'Connor NE. Skin regenerated from cultured epithelial autografts on full-thick-ness burn wounds from 6 days to 5 years after grafting. A light, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Lab Invest 1989; 60: 600–612.
   Google Scholar
• Converse JM, Robb-Smith AHT. The healing of surface cutaneous wounds: its analogy with the healing of superficial burns. Ann Surg 1944; 120: 873–885.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darby I, Skalli 0, Gabbiani G. a-Smooth muscle actin is transiently expressed by myofibroblasts during experimental wound healing. Lab Invest 1990; 63: 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich HP. The role of connective tissue matrix in wound healing. Prog Clin Biol Res 1987; 266: 243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich HP, Desmoulie're A, Diegelmann RF, et al. Morphological and immunochemical differ-ences between keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am J Pathol 1994; 145: 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich HP, Hembry RM. A comparative study of fibroblasts in healing freeze and burn injuries in rats. Am J Pathol 1984; 117: 218–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich HP, Rajaratnam JBM. Cell locomotion forces versus cell contraction forces for collagen lattice contraction: an in vitro model of wound contraction. Tissue Cell 1990; 22: 407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hadidy M, Tesauro P, Cavallini M, Colonna M, Rizzo F, Signorini M. Contraction and growth of deep burn wounds covered by non-meshed and meshed split-thickness skin grafts in humans. Burns 1994; 20: 226–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabbiani G. The biology of the myofibroblast. Kidney Int 1992; 41: 530–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbiani G, Majno G. Dupuytren's contracture: fibroblast contraction? Am J Pathol 1972; 66: 131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia 1971; 27: 549–550.
   Google Scholar
• Germain L, Jean A, Auger FA, Garrel DR. Human wound healing fibroblasts have greater contractile properties than dermal fibroblasts. J Surg Res 1994; 57: 268–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillman T, Penn J, Bronks D, Roux M. A re-examination of certain aspects of the histogenesis of the healing of cutaneous wounds. A prelimin-ary report. Br J Surg 1955; 43: 141–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinshaw JR, Miller ER. Histology of healing split-thickness, full-thickness autogenous skin grafts and donor sites. Arch Surg 1965; 91: 658–670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschel BJ, Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G. Fibroblasts of granulation tissue: immunofluor-escent staining with antismooth muscle serum (35920). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1971; 138: 466–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. A comparative study of peroxidase antiperoxidase method and an avidin-biotin complex method for studying polypeptide hormones with radioimmunoassay antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol 1981; 75: 734–738.
   Google Scholar
• Kischer CW. The microvessels in hypertrophic scars, keloids and related lesions: a review. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 1992; 24: 281–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korula P, Varma SK, Sunderrao S. Inhibition of wound contraction by point-to-point adherent splintage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 725–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee WF, Bolen JVV, Sutton D. Myofibro-blasts in head and neck surgery. An experimental and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 982–986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luomanen M, Lehto VP, Meurman JH. Myo-fibroblasts in healing laser wounds of rat tongue mucosa. Arch Oral Biol 1988; 33: 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani U, Gomez DS, Carvalho DA, Ferreira MC. The tegument resulting from the healing of burns. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1995; 50: 140–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton D, Madden JVV, Peacock Jr EE. Effect of a local smooth muscle antagonist on wound contraction. Surg Forum 1972; 23: 511–512.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock EE:. Wound repair. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984: 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph R. The effect of skin graft preparation on wound contraction. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 142: 49–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan GB, Cliff WJ, Gabbiani G, et al. Myo-fibroblasts in human granulation tissue. Hum Pathol 1974; 5: 55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalli 0, Ropraz P. Trzeciak A, Benzonana G, Gillesen D, Gabbiani G. A monoclonal antibody against alpha-smooth muscle actin: a new probe for smooth muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 1986; 103: 2787–2796.
   Google Scholar
• Smahel J, Hurwitz PJ, Hurwitz N. Soft tissue response to textured silicone implants in an animal experiment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 474–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar