Classification, recording, and cleft palate surgery at the Uppsala Cleft Palate Centre

References

• Behlfelt K, Linder-Aronson S, Neander P. Laage-Hellman J. Dentition in children with enlarged tonsils compared to control children. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 416–429.
   Google Scholar
• Bergland 0, Sidhu S. Occlusal changes from the deciduous to the early mixed dentition in unilateral complete clefts. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11: 317–326.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin A:. Classification of cleft lip and palate. In: Grabb WG, Rosenstein SW, Bzoch KR, eds. Cleft lip and palate. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1971: 66–80.
   Google Scholar
• Davis J, Ritchie H. Classification of congenital clefts of the lip and palate. JAMA 1922; 79: 1323–1327.
   Google Scholar
• Elsahy NI. The modified striped Y-a systematic classification for cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1973; 10: 247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogh-Andersen P. Inheritance of harelip and cleft palate. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag-Arnold Busck, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Friede H, Lilja J. Dentofacial morphology in adolescent or early adult patients with cleft lip and palate after a treatment regimen that included vomer flap surgery and pushback palatal repair. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1994; 28: 113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman H, Sayetta R, Coston G, Hussey J. Symbolic representation of cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies HG, Fry WK. A new principle in the surgical treatment of 'congenital cleft palate' and its mechanical counterpart. BMJ 1921; 1: 335–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkins C. A classification of cleft lip and palate. Nomenclature Committee, American Association for Cleft Palate Rehabilitation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1962; 29: 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist R. Team work and clinical research in the treatment of cleft lip and palate. Swed Dent J 1973; 66: 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist R, Ponten B, Skoog T. The influence of cleft length and palatoplasty on the dental arch and the deciduous occlusion in cases of clefts of the secondary palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 12: 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist R, Ponten B. The influence of infant periosteoplasty on facial growth and dental occlusion from five to eight years of age in cases of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13: 305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellquist R, Svärdstriim K. Changes in treatment programme 1964-1984 at the Uppsala Cleft Palate Centre. In: Goinsky W, ed. Early treatment of cleft lip and palate. Bern: Hans Huber, 1986: 131–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hotz M, Gnoinski W, Nussbaumer H, Kistler E. Early maxillary orthopaedics in CLP cases: guidelines for surgery. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15: 405–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsson OP. Repair of isolated cleft palate. A comparison of one- and two stage surgery by dental arch measurements, cephalometry and speech analysis. Thesis. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson B, Lilja J, Friede H, A/littler M, Lauritzen C. The evolution of the therapeutic approach to cleft lip and palate in Gothenburg. In: Hotz M, ed. Early treatment of cleft lip and palate. Bern: Hans Huber, 1986: 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kemahan D. The striped Y-a symbolic classi-fication for cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 47: 469–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemahan D. Commentary to Friedman et al. Symbolic representation of cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kemahan D, Stark R. A new classification for cleft lip and palate. Plast Reonstr Surg 1958; 22: 435–441.
   Google Scholar
• Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids-their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition. Acta Otolaryngol 1970; (suppl 265): 6–132.
   Google Scholar
• Malek R, Psaume J. Nouvelle conception de la chronologie et de la technique chirurgicale du traitment des fentes labio-palatines. Résultats sur 220 cas. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1983; 28: 237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard R. Cleft craft. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1976: 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Perko MA. Two-stage closure of cleft palate. J Maxillofac Surg 1979; 7: 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruzansky S, Aduss H. Arch form and the deci-duous occlusion in complete unilateral clefts. Cleft Palate J 1964; 4: 411–418.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Semb G, Shaw W. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross RB, Johnston MC. Cleft lip and palate. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek H. Zur Frage der Frith- und Spätoperation der angeborenen Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Z Laryngol Rhinol 1951; 30: 51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schweckendiek H. Ergebnisse der Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspaltoperationen mit der primär-envelopoplastik. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 1958; 4: 167–172.
   Google Scholar
• Semb G. Analysis of the Oslo cleft lip and palate archive. Thesis. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Skoog T. Plastic surgery; new methods and refinements. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1974: 34–76.
   Google Scholar
• Veau V:. Division palatine. Paris: Masson et Cie, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Wardill W. The technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg 1937; 25: 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel MA, Salyer K, Ross B. Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revisited. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21: 263–269.
   Google Scholar