SOME BASIC FACTORS ESSENTIAL TO AUTOGENEIC NONVASCULARIZED ONLAY BONE GRAFTING TO THE CRANIOFACIAL SKELETON

REFERENCES

• Alberius P. Dahlin C, Linde A. Role of osteopromotion in experimental bone grafting to the skull: a study in adult rats using a membrane technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50: 829–834.
   Google Scholar
• Alberius P. Gordh M. Failure of onlay bone grafts to integrate over the calvarial suture: observations in adult isogeneic rats. J Cranio-maxillofac Surg 1996; 24: 251–255.
   Google Scholar
• Alberius P. Gordh M. Osteopontin and bone sialoprotein distribution at the bone graft recipient site. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124: 1382–1386.
   Google Scholar
• Alberius P. Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell 0. Influence of surrounding soft tissues on onlay bone graft incorporation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1996; 82: 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberius P. Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell 0. Onlay bone graft behaviour after marrow exposure of the recipient rat skull bone. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996; 30: 257–266.
   Google Scholar
• Alberius P. Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell 0. Effect of cortical perforations of both graft and host bed on onlay incorporation to the rat skull. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 554–561.
   Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T. Repair of bone grafts. A vital microscopic and histologic investigation in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 14: 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrektsson T. In vivo studies of bone graft. The possibility of vascular anastomoses in healing bone. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51: 9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspenberg P, Wang E, Thorngren KG. Bone morphogenetic protein induces bone in the squirrel monkey, but bone matrix does not. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 619–622.
   Google Scholar
• Aspenberg P. Jeppsson C, Wang JS, Boström M. Transforming growth factor beta and bone morphogenetic protein 2 for bone ingrowth: a comparison using bone chambers in rats. Bone 1996; 19: 499–503.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett SP, Lin KY, Yaremchuk MJ, Fallon M, Grossman RS, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone. Reply. (Correspon-dence). Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CAL. Clinical implication of cell function in bone grafting. Clin Orthop 1972; 87: 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck LS, Amento EP, Xu Y, et al. TGF-fil induces bone closure of skull defects: temporal dynamics of bone formation in defects exposed to rhTGF-f31. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8: 753–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom M, Lane JM, Tomin E, et al. Use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the rabbit ulnar nonunion model. Clin Orthop 1996; 327: 272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 11: suppl 16.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop 1983; 174: 28–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt H, Busbee III GA, Enniking WF. Repair of experimental autologous grafts of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1975; 57A: 814–819.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt H, Enneking WF. Transplantation of bone. Symposium on organ transplantation. Surg Clin North Am 1978; 58: 403–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burwell RG. Studies in the transplantation of bone. VIII. Treated composite homograft auto-grafts of cancellous bone: an analysis of inductive mechanisms in bone transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg 1966; 48B: 532–566.
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG. The fate of bone grafts. In: Apley AG, ed. Recent advances in orthopaedics. London: Churchill, 1969: 115–207.
   Google Scholar
• Burwell RG. The function of bone marrow in the incorporation of a bone graft. Clin Orthop 1985; 200: 125–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Ruskin J, Higginbottom F, Hardwick R, Dahlin C, Schenk R. Osseointegration of titanium implants in bone regenerated in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 666–681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Celeste AJ, Jannazzi JA, Taylor RC, et al. Identification of transforming growth factor fl family members present in bone-inductive protein purified from bovine bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 9843–9847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeste AJ, Song JJ, Cox K, Rosen V, Wozney JM. Bone morphogenetic protein-9, a new member of the TGF-fl super-family. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9 (suppl): S136.
   Google Scholar
• Chen NT, Glowacki J, Bucky LP, Hong H-Z, Kim W-K, Yaremchuk MJ. The roles of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay bone grafts in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 714–722.
   Google Scholar
• Cook SD, Wolfe MW, Salkeld SL, Rueger DC. Effect of recombinant human osteogenic pro-tein-1 on healing of segmental defects in non-human primates. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 734–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordewener F, Bos R, Rozema F, Houtman W. Poly(L-Lactide) implants for repair of human orbital floor defects: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of long-term results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig Gray J, Elves MW. Donor cells' con-tribution to osteogenesis in experimental can-cellous bone grafts. Clin Orthop 1982; 163: 261–271.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 672–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin C, Alberius P, Linde A. Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique. J Neurosurg 1991; 74: 487–491.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin C, Andersson L, Linde A. Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A con-trolled clinic study. Clin Oral Implant Res 1991; 2: 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Linde A. Membrane induced bone augmentation at titanium im-plants. A report of 10 fixtures followed from 1 to 3 years after loading. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991; 11: 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin C, Linde A, Wickert H. Stimulation of early bone formation by the combination of an osteopromotive membrane technique and hy-perbaric oxygen. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993; 27: 103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleu J, Trueta J. Vascularization of bone grafts in the anterior chamber of the eye. J Bone Joint Surg 1965; 47: 319–329.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan MG, Dickerson NC, Hellstein JVV, Hanson U. Autologous calvarial and iliac onlay bone grafts in miniature swine. J Oral Max-illofac Surg 1993; 51: 898–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermis I, Poole M. The effects of soft tissue coverage on bone graft resorption in the craniofacial region. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45: 26–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fasano D, Gasparini G, Menoni V, Bertoni F, Bacchini P. The fate of onlay membranous bone grafts in different facial recipient sites. Eur J Plast Surg 1989; 12: 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelman RD, Eason AL, Rakijian DE, Tutundzhyan Y, Hardesty RA. Elevated IGF-II and TGF-fl concentrations in human calvarial bone: potential mechanism for increased graft survival and resistance to osteoporosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 732–738.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J, Wood MB. Experimental comparison of bone revascularization by musculocutaneous and cutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79: 81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler E. Perforated demineralized bone matrix: A new form of osteoinductive bioma-terial. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 687–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart TN, Kirker-Head CA, Kriz MJ, et al. Healing segmental femural defects in sheep using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein. Clin Orthop 1993; 293: 317–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J, Mase C, Newman MH. Fixed membranous bone graft survival after recipient bed alteration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 589–596.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Mase CA, Newman MH. The influence of bony architecture on fixed mem-branous bone graft survival. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 34: 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Gordh M, Alberius P. Lindberg L, Johnell 0. Bone graft incorporation after cortical perfora-tions of the host bed. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 664–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordh M, Alberius P. Johnell 0, Lindberg L, Linde A. Osteopromotive membranes enhance onlay integration and maintenance in the adult rat skull. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27: 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gordh M, Alberius P. Johnell 0, Lindberg L, Linde A. Effects of rhBMP-2 and osteopromo-tive membranes on experimental bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosain AK, McCarty JG, Staffenberg D, Glat PM, Simmons DJ. The histomorphologic changes in vascularized bone transfers and their interrelationship with the recipient sites: A 1-year study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1001–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Gosain AK, Song L, Capel CC, Corrao MA, Lim T-H. Biomechanical and histologic altera-tion of facial recipient bone after reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and alloplastic implants: a 1-year study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 1561–1571.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlow J, Nyman S, Karring T. Maintenance of new attachment gained through guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 315–317.
   Google Scholar
• Ham AW:. Some histophysiological problems peculiar to calcified tissues. J Bone Joint Surg 1952; 34A: 701–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardesty RA, Marsh JL. Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85: 5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick R, Hayes BK, Flynn C. Devices for dentoalveolar regeneration: an up-to-date litera-ture review. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• Hedner E, Linde A, Nilsson A. Systematically and locally administered growth hormone stimulates bone healing in combination with osteopromotive membranes: an experimental study in rats. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 1952–1960.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger J. Factors for osseous repair and delivery: part I. J Craniofac Surg 1993; 4: 102–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollinger J. Factors for osseous repair and delivery: part II. J Craniofac Surg 1993; 4: 135–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollinger JO, Leong K. Poly(a-hydroxy acids): Carriers for bone morphogenetic proteins. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan BLM:. Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate devel-opment. Genes Dev 1996; 10: 1580–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iizuka T, Mikkonen P. Paukku P. Lindqvist C. Reconstruction of orbital floor with polydiox-anone plate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 83–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isgaard J, Nilsson A, Lindahl A, Jansson JO, Isaksson OGP. Effects of local administration of GH and IGF-I on longitudinal bone growth in rats. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: E367–E372.
   Google Scholar
• Ishimaru J-I, Kurita K, Handa Y, Goss AN. Effect of marrow perforation on the sheep temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 21: 239–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenley R, Marden L, Turek T, Jin L, Ron E, Hollinger JO. Osseous regeneration in the rat calvarium using novel delivery systems for recombinant human bone morphogenetic pro-tein-2 (rhBMP-2). J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 1139–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knize D. The influence of periosteum and calcitonin on onlay bone graft survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 3: 190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi K, Agrawal K, Jackson IT, Vega JB. The effect of insulin-like growth factor 1 on craniofacial bone healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1129–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki M, Katagiri T, Suda T. Bone morpho-genetic protein-2 does not alter the differentia-tion pathway of committed progenitors of osteoblasts and chondrablasts. Cell Tissue Res 1996; 284: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Körlof B, Nylen B, Ritz KA. Bone grafting of skull defects: a report of 55 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusiak IF, Zins JE, Whitaker LA. The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 510–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance EM:. Some observations on bone graft technology. Clin Orthop 1985; 200: 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• LaTrenta GA, McCarthy JG, Breitbart AS, Sissons HA. The role of rigid fixation in bone-graft augmentation of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 578–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levander G. A study of bone regeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1938; 67: 705–714.
   Google Scholar
• Lin KY, Bartlett SP, Yaremchuk MJ, Fallon M, Grossman RF, Whitaker LA. The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde A, Alberius P. Dahlin C, Bjurstam K, Sundin Y. Osteopromotion: a soft tissue exclu-sion principle using a membrane for bone healing and bone neogenesis. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1116–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Linde A, Hedner E. Recombinant bone mor-phogenetic protein-2 enhances bone healing, guided by osteopromotive e-PTFE membranes: an experimental study in rats. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 56: 549–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm TS, Urist MR. A quantitative analysis of new bone formation by induction in compo-sitive grafts of bone marrow and bone matrix. Clin Orthop 1980; 150: 288–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm TC, Gao TJ, Lindholm TS. The role of autogeneic bone marrow in the repair of a skull trephine defect filled with hydroxyapatite granules in the rabbit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 23: 306–311.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano AJ, Cestero HJ, Salyer KE. The early vascularization of onlay bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58: 302–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowlem R. Bone grafting. Br J Plast Surg 1963; 16: 293–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nash TJ, Howlett CR, Martin C, Steele J, Johnson KA, Hicklin DJ. Effect of platelet-derived growth factor on tibial osteotomies in rabbits. Bone 1994; 15: 203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen BM, Andreassen TT, Ledet T, Oxlund H. Local injection of TGF-fl increases the strength of tibial fractures in the rat. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman S, Linde J, Karring T. Reattachment - New Attachment. In: Linde J, ed. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. Copenhagen: Munks-gaard, 1988: 409–429.
   Google Scholar
• Oldund SA, Prolo DJ, Gutierrez RV, et al. Quantitative comparisons of healing in cranial fresh autografts, frozen autografts and processed autografts, and allografts in canine skull defects. Clin Orthop 1986; 205: 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkaymak E, Schnegelsberg PNJ, Jin DF, et al. Osteogenic protein-2; a new member of the transforming growth factor-fl super-family ex-pressed early in embryogenesis. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 25220–25227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer LA:. The fate of autogenous human bone grafts. Br J Plast Surg 1950-1951; 3: 233–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips JH, Rahn BA. Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone-graft resorption. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82: 872–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JH, Rahn BA. Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone graft revascularization and bone deposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85: 891–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piette P. Alberius P. Samman N, Linde A. Experience with e-PTFE membrane application to bone grafting of cleft maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24: 327–332.
   Google Scholar
• Pinholt EM, Solheim E, Talsnes 0, Larsen TB, Bang G, Kirkeby 0J. Revascularization of calvarial, mandibular, tibial, and iliac bone grafts in rats. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 33: 193–197.
   Google Scholar
• Prolo DJ, Rodrigo H. Contemporary bone graft physiology and surgery. Clin Orthop 1985; 200: 322–342.
   Google Scholar
• Puranen J. Reorganization of fresh and pre-served bone transplants. Acta Orthop Scand 1966; suppl 92.
   Google Scholar
• Reddi AFT:. Cell biology and biochemistry of endochondral bone development. Coll Relat Res 1981; 1: 209–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ripamonti U, Duneas N. Tissue morphogenesis and regeneration by bone morphogenetic pro-teins. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 227–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripamonti U, van der Heever B, Sampath TK, Tucker MM, Rueger DC, Reddi AH. Complete regeneration of bone in the baboon by recombi-nant human osteogenic protein-1 (h0P-1, bone morphogenetic protein-7). Growth Factors 1996; 13: 273–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronningen H, Solheim LF, Langeland N. Bone formation enhanced by induction. Bone growth in titanium implants in rats. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56: 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen V, Wozney JM, Wang EA, et al. Purification and molecular cloning of a novel group of BMPs and localization of BMP mRNA in developing bone. Connect Tissue Res 1989; 20: 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudkin GH, Miller TA. Growth factors in surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salyer KE, Gendler E, Menedez J, Simon TR, Kelly KM, Barclach J. Demineralized perfo-rated bone implants in craniofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992; 3: 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sampath TK, Muthukumaran N, Reddi AIL Isolation of osteogenin, an extracellular matrix-associated, bone-inductive protein, by heparin affinity chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84: 7109–7113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg E, Dahlin C, Linde A. Bone regenera-tion by the osteopromotion technique using bioabsorbable membranes: an experimental study in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 1106–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Scantlebury TV. 1982-1992: a decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1129–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigholm G, Gendler E, McKellop H, Marchall J, Moore T, Sarmiento A. Graft perforations favor osteoinduction. Studies of rabbit cortical grafts sterilized with ethylene oxide. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons DJ, Ellsasser JC, Cummins H, Lesker P. The bone inductive potential of a composite bone allograft-marrow autograft in rabbits. Clin Orthop 1973; 97: 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons HA, Raisz LG. Effects of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor and heparin on resorption of cultured fetal rat long bone. J Bone Miner Res 1991; 6: 1301–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon P, Babin SR, Delloye C, Schmitt D. Les multiperformations des allogreffes osseuses cryoconservees. Etude histologique et micro-radiographique comparative d'allogreffes per-forees et non perforees chez le mouton. Int Orthop 1993; 17: 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Abramson M. Membranous vs endochondral bone autografts. Arch Otolaryn-gol 1974; 99: 203–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnecker MC, Whitaker LA, Brighton CT. Electrical stimulation of onlay bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82: 580–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan WG, Szwajkun PR. Revascularization of cranial versus iliac crest bone grafts in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1105–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarsoly E, Ostrowski K, Moskalewski S, Lojek T, Kumatowski W, Krompecher ST. Incorpora-tion of lyophilized and radiosterilized perfo-rated and unperforated bone grafts in dogs. Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung 1969; 10: 55–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thaller SR, Dart A, Tesluk H. The effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 on critical size calvarial defects in Sprague-Dawley rats. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31: 429–433.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson N, Casson JA. Experimental onlay Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 33 bone grafts to the jaws. A preliminary study in dogs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970; 46: 341–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toriumi DM, Kotler HS, Lusenberg DP, Bottrop MF, Wang EA. Mandibular reconstruc-tion with a recombinant bone-inducing factor: functional, histologic and biomechanical evalu-ation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 1101.
   Google Scholar
• Trueta J. The role of the vessels in osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1963; 45B: 402–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965; 150: 893–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971; 50: 1392–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang EA, Rosen V, D'Alessandro JS, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic pro-tein induces bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 2220–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Aspenberg P. Basic fibroblast growth factor and bone induction in rats. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 557–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JS, Aspenberg P. Basic fibroblast growth factor increases allograft incorporation. Bone chamber study in rats. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 27–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikjaer D, Blom S, Hjorting-Hansen E, Pinholt EM. Effect of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on bone formation in calvarial defects: an experimental study in rabbits. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Viljanen VV, Lindholm TC, Gao TS, Lindholm TS. Low dosage of native allogeneic bone morphogeneic protein in repair of sheep calvar-ial defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes GH, Kemahan DA, Christenson M. The long-term survival of onlay bone grafts. A comparative study in mature and immature animals. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 15: 374–378.
   Google Scholar
• Wozney JM. The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 32: 160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozney JM. Molecular biology of bone mor-phogenetic proteins. In: Urist MR, O'Conner BT, Burwell RG, eds. Bone grafts, Derivatives & Substitutes. 1st ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994: 397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Wozney JM. The bone morphogenetic protein family: multifactorial cellular regulators in the embryo and adult. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106 (suppl 1): 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, et al. Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 1988; 242: 1528–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegzula HD, Buck DC, Brekke J, Wozney JM, Hollinger JO. Bone formation with use of rhBMP-2 (Recombinant human bone morpho-genetic protein-2). J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79A: 1178–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Zellin G. Growth factors and bone regeneration - implications of barrier membranes. Swed Dent J 1998; suppl 129: 1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zellin G, Gritli-Linde A, Linde A. Healing of mandibular defects with different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes: an experi-mental study in rats. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 601–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellin G, Linde A. Treatment of segmental defects in long bones using osteopromotive membranes and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Scand J Plast Re-constr Surg Hand Surg 1997; 30: 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Zellin G, Linde A. Importance of delivery systems for growth-stimulatory factors in com-bination with osteopromotive membranes. An experimental study using rhBMP-2 in rat man-dibular defects. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 35: 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Zellin G, Alberius P, Linde A. Autoclaved bone for craniofacial reconstruction: effects of sup-plementation with bone marrow or recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-2. Plast Re-constr Surg 1998; 102: 792–800.
   Google Scholar
• Zellin G, Beck S, Hardwick R, Linde A. Opposite effects of recombinant human trans-forming growth factor-/fl on bone regeneration in vivo: effects of exclusion of periosteal cells by microporous membrane. Bone 1998; 22: 613–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone. Implications for craniofa-cial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 778–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zins JE, Kusiak if, Whitaker LA, Enlow DH. The influence of the recipient site on bone grafts to the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada K, Tabata Y, Yamamoto K, et al. Potential efficiacy of basic fibroblast growth factor incorporated in biodegradable hydrogels for skull bone regeneration. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 871–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa A, Nakamura T, Arakaki M, Yano H, Yamashita S, Fujii T. Migration of hydro-xyapatite onlays into the mandible and nasal bone and local bone turnover in growing rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1972–1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar