What Drives Intermediate Local Governments’ Spending Efficiency: The Case of French Départements

References

• Afonso, A. and Fernandes, S., 2006. Measuring local government spending efficiency: evidence for the Lisbon region. Regional Studies, 40 (1), 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, A. and Fernandes, S., 2008. Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37 (5), 1946–1979.
   Google Scholar
• Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L. and Tanzi, V., 2005. Public sector efficiency. An international comparison. Public Choice, 123 (3–4), 321–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcelus, F.J., Arocena, P., Cabases, F. and Pascual, P., 2007. On the efficiency of the delivery of municipal services. Universidad Publica de Navarra, Working Paper Series DT 92/07.
   Google Scholar
• Athanassopoulos, A. and Triantis, K., 1998. Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities. INFOR, 36 (3), 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, P. and van den Noord, P., 2001. Managing public expenditure: some emerging policy issues and a framework for analysis. OECD Economics Department, Working Paper No. 285.
   Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D. and Tortosa-Ausina, E., 2007. On the determinants of local government performance: a two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51 (2), 425–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D. and Tortosa-Ausina, E., 2010. Decentralization and efficiency of local government. The Annals of Regional Science, 45 (3), 571–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Coll, M, Prior-Jimenez, D. and Vela-Bargues, J., 2002. Efficiency and quality in local government management. The case of Spanish local authorities. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, WP 2002/2.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D. and Chang, H., 2006. The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 36 (2), 1311–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30 (9), 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D. and Gifford, J.L., 1988. A relative efficiency model for the evaluation of public health nurse productivity: a statistical foundation. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Bastida, F. and Garcia, J.A., 2008. Explaining differences in efficiency: an application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 42 (4), 515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P. and Otto, L., 2011. Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, D., Malt, R. and Oates, W.E., 1969. The rising cost of local public services: some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal, 22, 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLENCH, 2010. Les Collectivités Locales en Chiffres 2010. Paris: Direction Générale des Collectivités Locales.
   Google Scholar
• Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J. and Battese, G.E., 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science+Business.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, A., 2006. Decentralization in France: central steering, capacity building and identity construction. French Politics, 4 (1), 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J., 2004. Data envelopment analysis: history, models and interpretations. In: W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu, eds. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Daraio, C. and Simar, L., 2007. Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28 (1), 13–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B. and Kerstens, K., 1996. Radial and nonradial measures of technical efficiency: an empirical illustration for Belgian local governments using an FDH reference technology. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7 (1), 41–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B. and Kerstens, K., 2000. What is known about municipal efficiency? The Belgian case and beyond. In: L.T. Blank, ed. Public provision and performance. Contributions from efficiency and productivity measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V, 299–330.
   Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Moesen, W. and Vanneste, J., 1994. Explaining differences in productive efficiency: an application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice, 80 (3–4), 339–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa, M. and Stosic, B., 2005. Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities: correcting nonparametric frontier measurements for outliers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24 (2), 157–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edvardsen, D.F., 2004. Four essays on the measurement of productive efficiency. Thesis (PhD), School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2010. Public Finances in EMU 2010. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120 (3), 253–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, H.O., Schmidt, S.S. and Yaisawarng, S., 1999. Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12 (3), 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giménez, V.M. and Prior, D., 2007. Long- and short-term cost efficiency frontier evaluation: evidence from Spanish local government. Fiscal Studies, 28 (1), 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., Heinemann, F. and Kalb, A., 2007. Local governments in the wake of demographic change: efficiency and economies of scale in German municipalities. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Working Paper 07-036.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, B., Heinemann, F. and Kalb, A., 2010. Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: evidence from German municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 26 (2), 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B. and Moesen, W., 2009. Measuring local government technical (in)efficiency: an application and comparison of FDH, DEA and econometric approaches. Public Performance and Management Review, 32 (4), 489–504.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, R. and Tommasino, P., 2011. Public sector efficiency and political culture. Bank of Italy, Economic Working Papers No. 786.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M.F. and Ruggiero, J., 2008. Evaluating US state police performance using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 113 (2), 1031–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauner, D., 2008. Explaining differences in public sector efficiency: evidence from Russia’s regions. World Development, 36 (10), 1745–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauner, D. and Kyobe, A., 2010. Determinants of government efficiency. World Development, 38 (11), 1527–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, L., Kumbhakar, S.C. and Heshmati, A., 1996. DEA; DFA and SFA: a comparison. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7 (2–3), 303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalb, A., 2010. Public sector efficiency: an application to local governments in Germany. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K., 2007. Die Öffentlichen Ausgaben der Kantone und ihrer Gemeinden im Quervergleich. Eidgenössisches Volkswirtschafts departement EVD, Strukturberichterstattung NR. 37. Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Kriese, M., 2008. Effizienzanalyse der Sächsischen Gemeinden. ifo Dresden berichtet, 5, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Loikkanen, H.A. and Susiluoto, I., 2006. Cost efficiency of Finnish municipalities in basic service provision 1994–2002. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 96.
   Google Scholar
• Loikkanen, H.A., Susiluoto, I. and Funk, M., 2011. The role of city managers and external variables in explaining efficiency differences of Finnish municipalities. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 312.
   Google Scholar
• Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M. and Serrano, L., 2003. Human capital in OECD countries: technical change, efficiency and productivity. International Review of Applied Economics, 17 (4), 419–435.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.C., 2003. Public choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2003. Economic surveys France, Volume 2003/11, July 2003. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2007. Economic surveys France, Volume 2007/13, June 2007. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2009a. Governance at a glance 2009, Country Note: France. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2009b. OECD economic surveys France, Volume 2009/5, April 2009. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2010a. Economic factbook 2010. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2010b. Economic outlook 2010. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, A.M. and Zofio, J., 2001. Evaluating effectiveness in public provision of infrastructure and equipment: the case of Spanish municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15 (1), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, H., 2008. Die Demographieabhängigkeit der Ausgaben und Einnahmen der Öffentlichen Haushalte. Eine Empirische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung der Föderalen Verflechtungen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L., 2003. Detecting outliers in frontier models: a simple approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20 (3), 391–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W., 2000. Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13 (1), 49–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W., 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136 (1), 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W., 2008. Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: recent developments and perspectives. In: H. Fried, CA.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds. The measurement of productive efficiency, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–521.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J.E., 2000. Economics of the public sector, 3rd ed. New York: Norten.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, T., 2006. Cost efficiency in Japanese local governments: the economic effect of information technology in Japanese local government. 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Osaka.
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Eeckaut, P., Tulkens, H. and Jamar, M., 1993. Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities. In: H.O. Fried, C.A. Knox Lovell and S.S. Schmidt, eds. The measurement of productive efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 300–334.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C., 1999. Performance indicators and efficiency measurement in public libraries. Australian Economic Review, 32 (1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C., 2000. Cost efficiency in Australian local government: a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financial Accountability and Management, 16 (3), 201–224.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C. and Dollery, B., 2000. Efficiency measurement in the local public sector: econometric and mathematical programming frontier techniques. Queensland University of Technology, School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series No. 078.
   Google Scholar