Austere State Strategies: Regenerating for Recovery and the Resignification of Regeneration

References

• Allen, C. 2008. Housing Market Renewal and Social Class. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• AC (Audit Commission). 2012. Tough Times 2012: Councils’ Financial Health in Challenging Times. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, B., ed. 1985. “Islands of Renewal in Seas of Decay.” In The New Urban Reality, 35–55. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmon, N. 1999. “Three Generations of Urban Renewal Policies: Analysis and Policy Implications.” Geoforum 30 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00012-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLG (Communities and Local Government). 2010. “ £1 Billion Fund to Help Regional Business.” News Release, p. 29, June.
   Google Scholar
• CLG (Communities and Local Government). 2008. Transforming Places; Changing Lives A Framework for Regeneration. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• CLG (Communities and Local Government.) 2011. Regeneration to Enable Growth: What Government Is Doing in Support of Community-Led Regeneration. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• CLG (Communities and Local Government). 2012. Regeneration to Enable Growth: A Toolkit Supporting Community-Led Regeneration. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• CLG (Communities and Local Government) and BERR (Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform). 2007. Taking Forward the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. 2007. Understanding Urban Policy A Critical Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, C., C. Fraser, and S. Percy, eds. 2003. Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R., T. Gore, S. Pearson, P. Tyler, D. Clapham, J. Muir, and D. Robertson. 2014. Regeneration and Poverty: Evidence and Policy Review. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dargan, L. 2009. “Participation and Local Urban Regeneration: The Case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK.” Regional Studies 43 (2): 305–317. doi:10.1080/00343400701654244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokmeci, V., U. Altunbas, and B. Yazgi. 2007. “Revitalisation of the Main Street of a Distinguished Old Neighbourhood in Istanbul.” European Planning Studies 15 (1): 153–166. doi:10.1080/09654310601016788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., and J. Rees. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Neighbourhood in the New Labour Era.” Policy & Politics 40 (1): 38–54. doi:10.1332/030557310X550079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. 1968. Government and Slum Housing: A Century of Frustration. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. 2006. Home Truths: The Myth and Reality of Regeneration in Dundee. Edinburgh: The Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2001. “Globalization and the “Spatial Fix”.” Geographische Revue 2: 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review 53: 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., J. Peck, and I. Strange. 1997. “Turf Wars: The Battle for Control over English Local Economic Development.” Local Government Studies 23 (1): 88–106. doi:10.1080/03003939708433856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havers, I. 2013. “Small Actions – Big Change: Delivering Regeneration in the Age of Austerity.” Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal 6 (4): 426–431.
   Google Scholar
• Heseltine, M. 2012. No Stone Unturned in Pursuit of Growth. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010a. The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010b. Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2011. Unlocking Growth in Cities. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2007. Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury & BIS (Business Innovation and Skills). 2013. Government’s Response to the Heseltine Review. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HOC (House of Commons). 2011. House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee, Regeneration, Sixth Report of Session 2010–12. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. S. 2012. “Conceptualizing the New Urban Renewal Comparing the Past to the Present.” Urban Affairs Review 48 (4): 498–527. doi:10.1177/1078087411434905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode 34 (3): 452–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRF (Joseph Rowntree Foundation). 2008. Transforming Places; Changing Lives: A Framework for Regeneration Submission by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and K. Ward. 2002. “Excavating the Logic of British Urban Policy: Neoliberalism as the ‘Crisis of Crisis-Management’.” Antipode 34 (3): 473–494. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. 2014. “The Urban Injustices of New Labour’s ‘New Urban Renewal’: The Case of the Aylesbury Estate in London.” Antipode 46 (4): 921–947. doi:10.1111/anti.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. [1991] 1974. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. [2003] 1970. The Urban Revolution. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Leunig, T., and J. Swaffield. 2008. Cities Unlimited: Making Urban Regeneration Work. London: Policy Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, J. 2009. “Local Economic Development and the Sub-National Review: Old Wine in New Bottles?” Local Government Studies 35 (1): 39–59. doi:10.1080/03003930802663855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, A., L. Chilton, D. Purdue, L. Evans, M. Wilson, and R. Ardron. 2007. Learning to Change Neighbourhoods: Lessons from the guide neighbourhoods programme–- Evaluation Report. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D., P. Greenhalgh, and L. Pugalis. 2015. “Is the Grass Always Greener? Making Sense of Convergence and Divergence in Regeneration Policies in England and Scotland.” The Geographical Journal 181 (1): 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2014. Progress Report on the Regional Growth Fund. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., and S. Syrett. 2008. “Making the Links: Economic Deprivation, Neighbourhood Renewal and Scales of Governance.” Regional Studies 42 (1): 133–148. doi:10.1080/00343400601147273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, L., and M. Komarova. 2011. “Contesting Territorial Fixity? A Case Study of Regeneration in Belfast.” Urban Studies 48 (10): 2013–2028. doi:10.1177/0042098010382678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M., M. Ball, N. Blake, and T. Key. 2009. The Credit Crunch and Regeneration: Impact and Implications. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2012. “Austerity Urbanism.” City 16 (6): 626–655. doi:10.1080/13604813.2012.734071.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., and K. Shaw, eds. 2009. Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L. 2009. “Putting the Fox in Charge of the Hens?” Town & County Planning 78 (2): 67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L. 2011. “Regeneration ‘Con-Demned’?” Town & Country Planning 80 (4): 188–191.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L. 2013. “Hitting the Target but Missing the Point: The Case of Area-Based Regeneration.” Community Development 44 (5): 617–634. doi:10.1080/15575330.2013.854257.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., and G. Bentley. 2013. “Economic Development 2010–2013: A Mid-Term Assessment.” Local Economy 28 (7–8): 935–947. doi:10.1177/0269094213506812.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., and J. Liddle. 2013. “‘Editorial: Austerity Era Regeneration – Conceptual Issues and Practical Challenges, Part 1.” Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal 6 (4): 333–338.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., J. Liddle, I. Deas, N. Bailey, M. Pill, C. Green, C. Pearson, et al. 2014. “Regeneration beyond Austerity: A Collective Viewpoint.” Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal 7 (2): 188–197.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., and D. McGuinness. 2013. “From a Framework to a Toolkit: Urban Regeneration in an Age of Austerity.” Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 6 (4): 339–353.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., and A. R. Townsend. 2014. “The Emergence of ‘New’ Spatial Coalitions in the Pursuit of Functional Regions of Governance”. Regional Science Policy & Practice 6 (1): 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., ed. 2000. “The Evolution, Definition and Purpose of Urban Regeneration.” In Urban Regeneration, A Handbook, 9–36. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., and H. Sykes, eds. 2000. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SEU (Social Exclusion Unit). 2004. Jobs and Enterprise in Deprived Areas. London: ODPM.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2011. “Uneven Development Redux.” New Political Economy 16 (2): 261–265. doi:10.1080/13563467.2011.542804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A., J. Okata, and S. Fujii. 2010. “Urban Renaissance as Intensification: Building Regulation and the Rescaling of Place Governance in Tokyo’s High-rise Manshon Boom.” Urban Studies 47 (3): 556–583. doi:10.1177/0042098009349775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern, A. 2013. “‘Regeneration’ in a Time of Austerity Will Mean the Death of This Metaphor, but What Will Come Next?” Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal 6 (4): 399–405.
   Google Scholar
• Southern, R. 2002. “Understanding Multi-Sectoral Regeneration Partnerships as a Form of Local Governance.” Local Government Studies 28 (2): 16–32. doi:10.1080/714004146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrett, S., and D. North. 2010. “Between Economic Competitiveness and Social Inclusion: New Labour and the Economic Revival of Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Local Economy 25 (5): 476–493. doi:10.1080/02690942.2010.525959.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, A. 2013. Urban Regeneration in the UK. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, J. 2010. “Growing Pains,” Planning, November 12, p. 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. R. 2009. “Integration of Economic and Spatial Planning across Scales.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 22 (7): 643–659. doi:10.1108/09513550910993399.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. R., ed. 2012. “The Functionality of LEPs – are They Based on Travel to Work?” In Changing Gear – Is Localism the New Regionalism?, 35–44. London: The Smith Institute and Regional Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, P., C. Warnock, A. Provins, and B. Lanz. 2013. “Valuing the Benefits of Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 50 (1): 169–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. 2002. “Extracting Value from the City: Neoliberalism and Urban Redevelopment.” Antipode 34 (3): 519–540. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedge, E. B. 1958. “The Concept.” Urban Renewal 19 (1): 55–60.
   Google Scholar