The Flypaper Effect: Do Political Institutions Affect Danish Local Governments’ Response to Intergovernmental Grants?

References

• Bailey, S. J., and S. Connolly. 1998. “The Flypaper Effect: Identifying Areas for Further Research.” Public Choice 95 (3–4): 335–361. doi:10.1023/A:1005053921709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2002. “Budget Procedures and the Size of the Budget: Evidence from Danish Local Government.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2007. “Pengeafbrænding Før Lukketid? Om Kommunernes Økonomiske Dispositioner Op Mod Kommunesammenlægningerne I 2007.” Naar Politik Bliver Til Virkelighed, 23. Copenhagen: SFI.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2010. “Municipal Amalgamations and Common Pool Problems: The Danish Local Government Reform in 2007.” Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (1): 51–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boadway, R. W., and A. Shah. 2009. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, D. F., and W. E. Oates. 1971a. “The Analysis of Revenue Sharing in a New Approach to Collective Fiscal Decisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 85 (3): 416–439. doi:10.2307/1885931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, D. F., and W. E. Oates. 1971b. “Towards a Predictive Theory of Intergovernmental Grants.” The American Economic Review 61 (2): 440–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, M., E. Mörk, J. Rattsø, and H. Ågren. 2008. “Using a Discontinuous Grant Rule to Identify the Effect of Grants on Local Taxes and Spending.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (12): 2320–2335. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deller, S. C., and C. S. Maher. 2006. “A Model of Asymmetries in the Flypaper Effect.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (2): 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filimon, R., T. Romer, and H. Rosenthal. 1982. “Asymmetric Information and Agenda Control: The Bases of Monopoly Power in Public Spending.” Journal of Public Economics 17 (1): 51–70. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(82)90025-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S. 2000. “Is the Response of State and Local Highway Spending Symmetric to Increases and Decreases in Federal Highway Grants?” Public Finance Review 28 (1): 3–25. doi:10.1177/109114210002800101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S., and W. Oates. 1996. “Asymmetries in the Response to Increases and Decreases in Inter-Governmental Grants: Some Empirical Findings.” National Tax Journal 49 (4): 501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, T. J. 1998. “The Relationship between State Income Taxes and Local Property Taxes: Education Finance in New Jersey.” National Tax Journal 51 (2): 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. 2004. “Do Federal Grants Boost School Spending? Evidence from Title I.” Journal of Public Economics 88 (9–10): 1771–1792. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D., and D. Porter. 2009. Basic Econometric. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Heyndels, B. 2001. “Asymmetries in the Flypaper Effect: Empirical Evidence for the Flemish Municipalities.” Applied Economics 33 (10): 1329–1334. doi:10.1080/00036840010004536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, J. R., and R. H. Thaler. 1995. “Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 217–226. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P. 1998. Do Balanced Budget Rules Work? U.S. Experience and Possible Lessons for the EMU. Working Paper No. 5838. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, B. 2002. “Endogenous Federal Grants and Crowd-out of State Government Spending: Theory and Evidence from the Federal Highway Aid Program.” The American Economic Review 92 (1): 71–92. doi:10.1257/000282802760015612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R., and P. B. Musgrave. 1984. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1968. “The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy.” The American Economic Review 58 (2): 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120–1149. doi:10.1257/jel.37.3.1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poterba, J. M. 1994. “State Responses to Fiscal Crises: The Effects of Budgetary Institutions and Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (4): 799–821. doi:10.1086/261955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poterba, J. M., and J. Von Hagen. 1999. Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rattsø, J., and P. Tovmo. 2002. “Fiscal Discipline and Asymmetric Adjustment of Revenues and Expenditures: Local Government Responses to Shocks in Denmark.” Public Finance Review 30 (3): 208–234. doi:10.1177/109114210203000303.
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. 2006. Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stine, W. F. 1994. “Is Local Government Revenue Response to Federal Aid Symmetrical? Evidence from Pennsylvania.” National Tax Journal 47 (4): 799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Finance Committee of the Ministry of the Interior. 2004. Et Nyt Udligningssystem. Betænkning nr. 1437. Copenhagen: The Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of the Interior. 2006a. Kommunal Udligning Og Generell Tilskud 2006. Copenhagen: The Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of the Interior. 2006b. The Local Government Act. Copenhagen: The Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of the Interior. 2008a. De Kommunale og Regionale Regnskaber 2008. Copenhagen: The Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of the Interior. 2008b. The Local Government Act. Copenhagen: The Ministry of the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Tovmo, P., and T. Falch. 2002. “The Flypaper Effect and Political Strength.” Economics of Governance 3 (2): 153–170. doi:10.1007/s101010100036.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hagen, J. 2002. “Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance.” Economic and Social Review 33 (3): 263–284.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hagen, J., and I. J. Harden. 1995. “Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline.” European Economic Review 39 (3–4): 771–779. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00084-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1975. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. 1974. Political Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. 1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2012. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, P. G. 1991. “The Elusive Flypaper Effect.” Journal of Urban Economics 30 (3): 310–328. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(91)90052-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar