How Second Order Are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal Elections

References

• Ackaert, J., H. Reynaert, and P. Van Aelst. 2007. “Hoe duurzaam is de heraangelegde Dorpsstraat ? [How sustainable is local politics?]” Res Publica 49 (1): 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, J. J. 2009. “Does Political Knowledge Erode Party Attachments? A Review of the Cognitive Mobilization Thesis.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and D. S. Ward. 1996. “Barometer Elections in Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 15 (4): 447–460. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(95)00056-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, A., M. Gallagher, and G. Sandri. 2014. “Legislators’ Constituency Orientation.” In Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments, edited by K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C., and W. Howell. 2007. “Accountability and Local Elections: Rethinking Retrospective Voting.” The Journal of Politics 69 (3): 844–858. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00579.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., and W. E. Miller. 1957. “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51 (2): 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsey, T. M., and R. A. Jackson. 2001. “Misreport of Vote Choice in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1 (2): 196–209. doi:10.1177/153244000100100205.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., and M. C. Stewart. 1987. “Partisan Inconsistency and Partisan Change Partisan Inconsistency in Federal States : The Case of Canada.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (2): 383–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, F. 2008. “One Voter, Two First-Order Elections?” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 492–504. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 1984. “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Journal of Politics 46 (2): 264–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2012. “Apartisans and the Changing German Electorate.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., and M. P. Wattenberg. 2002. Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R. 2012. “Electoral Volatility, Political Sophistication, Trust and Efficacy: A Study on Changes in Voter Preferences during the Belgian Regional Elections of 2009.” Acta Politica 47 (1): 18–41. doi:10.1057/ap.2011.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., S. Marien, and M. Hooghe. 2012. PartiRep Exit-Poll 2012. Technical Report. Leuven: University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• De Rynck, F., E. Wayenberg, K. Steyvers, and J. B. Pilet. 2010. “Belgium: A Tale of Regional Divergence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lindström, 71–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, K. 2012. The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, G. M., and C. O. Villodres. 2010. “The Political Leadership Factor in the Spanish Local Elections.” Lex Localis 8 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissel, B. 2009. “Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21.” Local Government Studies 35 (4): 401–414. doi:10.1080/03003930902999522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., and B. Heyndels. 2006. “Disentangling the Effects of Political Fragmentation on Voter Turnout: The Flemish Municipal Elections.” Economics and Politics 18 (3): 367–387. doi:10.1111/ecpo.2006.18.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. N. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T., and M. Hooghe. 2008. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? An Experimental Study on voter Responses to Pre-Electoral Coalitions.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 556–577. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2008.47.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A., I. McLean, B. Taylor, and J. Curtice. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1999.35.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennau, S., and J. Ackaert. 2013. “Vertrouwen en stemgedrag bij lokale verkiezingen [Trust and voting behaviour in local elections].” In de lokale kiezer: Het kiesgedrag bij de Belgische gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012 [the local voter: voting behaviour in Belgian municipal elections on October 2012], edited by R. Dassonneville, M. Hooghe, S. Marien, and J. B. Pilet, 245–274. Brussel: VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyerick, A., and K. Steyvers. 2013. “Lokaal of nationaal? Het beste van twee werelden combineren [Local or national? A combination of the best of two worlds].” In De verkiezingen van 14 oktober 2012: de kracht van verandering? Lokale en provinciale politiek [The elections of 14 October 2012: the power of change? Local and provincial politics], edited by H. Reynaert and K. Steyvers. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M. 2012. “The Political Crisis in Belgium (2007–2011): A Federal System Without Federal Loyalty.” Representation 48 (1): 131–138. doi:10.1080/00344893.2012.653250.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., B. Heyndels, D. Jottier, T. Bircan, and S. Botterman. 2010. “Explaining the Green Vote: Belgian Local Elections, 1994–2006.” Environmental Politics 19 (6): 930–950. doi:10.1080/09644016.2010.518682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. K., and R. G. Niemi. 1966. “Party Identification at Multiple Levels of Government.” American Journal of Sociology 72 (1): 86–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., J. Vowles, S. Banducci, and T. Donovan. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System.” Electoral Studies 21 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00031-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics. A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and D. P. Redlawsk. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J. 2011. “Campaign Effects on Voter Decision Making”. PhD diss., University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., and P. Van Aelst. 2014. “First-Order, Second-Order or Third-Rate? A Comparison of Turnout in European, Local and National Elections in the Netherlands.” Electoral Studies 35 (3): 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., and R. Nadeau. 2004. “Split-Ticket Voting: The Effects of Cognitive Madisonianism.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00143.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–528. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, S., B. Wauters, and A. Schouteden. Forthcoming. “Voting for Women in Belgium’s Flexible List System.” Politics & Gender.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 591–607. doi:10.1017/S000712349800026X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marthaler, S. 2008. “The Paradox of the Politically-Sophisticated Partisan: The French Case.” West European Politics 31 (5): 937–959. doi:10.1080/01402380802234607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2010. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H., and M. P. Wattenberg. 1985. “Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952-1980.” American Political Science Review 79 (2): 359–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1997. “Second-Order Elections Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 31 (1): 109–124. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1997.31.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prezworski, A., S. C. Stokes, and B. Manin. 1999. Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Put, G. J., B. Maddens, and J. Smulders. 2015. “Buying Local Votes: The Effect of Individual Campaign Spending Under a Semi-Open PR System in the Belgian Local Elections.” Local Government Studies 41 (1): 137–155. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.904227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2003. “Explaining Split-Ticket Voting at the 1979 and 1997 General and Local Elections in England.” Political Studies 51 (3): 558–572. doi:10.1111/post.2003.51.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2005. “Not All ‘Second-Order’ Contests are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 584–597. doi:10.1111/bjpi.2005.7.issue-4.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, K. 1984. “National Electoral Cycles and European Elections 1979-1984.” Electoral Studies 3 (3): 244–255. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(84)90005-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections - A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1980.8.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A., and C. Jeffery. 2013. “Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections?” Regional Studies 47 (3): 323–341. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.690069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, H. 1999. “Split-Ticket Voting in German Federal Elections, 1953–90: An Example of Sophisticated Balloting?” Electoral Studies 18 (4): 473–496. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00023-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., and R. J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., M. Franklin, and M. Marsh. 1996. “What Voters Teach us about Europe-Wide Elections: What Europe-Wide Elections Teach us about Voters.” Electoral Studies 15 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(96)00009-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., and B. Niemöller. 2008. “Recall Accuracy and Its Determinants.” In Electoral Behavior. Volume 4: Debates and Methodology, edited by K. Arzheimer and J. Evans, 232–280. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verhelst, T., H. Reynaert, and K. Steyvers. 2013. “Necessary Asymmetry or Undemocratic Imbalance? Professionalisation in the Recruitment and Career of Belgian Local Councillors.” Local Government Studies 39 (2): 273–297. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.747956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir, J., and B. Heyndels. 2006. “Tax Policy and Yardstick Voting in Flemish Municipal Elections.” Applied Economics 38 (19): 2285–2298. doi:10.1080/00036840500427536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldahl, R., and B. O. Aardal. 2000. “The Accuracy of Recalled Previous Voting: Evidence from Norwegian Election Study Panels.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (4): 373–389. doi:10.1111/scps.2000.23.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, B., D. Verlet, and J. Ackaert. 2012. “Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Reform? The Case of the Local Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91–111. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.629193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, R., C. Rallings, G. Borisyuk, and M. Thrasher. 2014. “Ballot Order Positional Effects in British Local Elections, 1973–2011.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (1): 119–136. doi:10.1093/pa/gss033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, F., and K. Deschouwer. 2007. “Het beschermde dorp. Nationale tendensen bij gemeenteraadsverkiezingen [The protected village. National tendencies within local elections].” Res Publica 49 (1): 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G. C. 1993. “Errors in Measuring Vote Choice in the National Election Studies, 1952–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 291–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar