Abolishing the Audit Commission: Framing, Discourse Coalitions and Administrative Reform

References

• Audit Commission. 2009. Are We Being Served? For the First Time All Public Services to Be Held to Account in Oneplace. [press release]. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. 2010. Letter from Audit Commission Chairman Michael O’Higgins to Eric Pickles. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. 2011a. Department for Community and Local Government Consultation: Audit Commission Detailed Response. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. 2011b. Statement Welcoming Consultation on the Future of Local Audit. [press release]. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, C. 2011. “The Time for Central Audit and Inspect is Over.” The Guardian. Accessed May 19, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2011/jul/07/central-inspection-audit-over
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 1997. “Public Services: Snapping at the Watchdog’s Heels.” The Guardian, p. 7, October 15.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Smith, D. 2008. Follow the Money: The Audit Commission, Public Money and the Management of Public Services, 1983–2008. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., and N. Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid, eds. 2002. New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• CLGC. 2012. Pre-appointment Hearing for the Chair of the Audit Commission: Fourth Report of the Session 2012–13. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• CLGC (Communities and Local Government Committee). 2011. Audit and inspection of local authorities: Fourth Report of the Session 2012–2013. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. 2010. Invitation to Join the Government of Britain: The Conservative Party Manifesto 2010. London: The Conservative party.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, S., and J. Goodship. 2002. “The Audit Commission and Public Services: Delivering for Whom?” Public Money and Management 22 (4): 33–40. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2010a. Eric Pickles to Disband Audit Commission in New Era of Town Hall Transparency, [press release], August 13.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2010b. “Correspondence between Civil Servants and Ministers Related to Abolition of Audit Commission.” Freedom of Information Release, November 1.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2010c. “Correspondence Related to Operation Victoria Sponge.” Freedom of Information Release, December 2.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2012. Draft Local Audit Bill: Summary of Consultation Responses. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions). 2001. Strong Local Leadership – Quality Public Services. Cm 5327. London: DETR.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, K., and C. Skelcher. 2014. “Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: A Strategic-Relational Analysis of Agency Responses to Termination Threats.” International Public Management Journal 17 (4): 540–563.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, S., 2010. “Councils Use Taxpayers’ Cash in Lobbying against Cuts at Party Conferences.” Daily Mail. Accessed July 3, 2012. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317030/Councils-use-taxpayers-cash-lobby-cuts-party-conferences.html
   Google Scholar
• Draft Local Audit Bill ad hoc Committee. 2013. Draft Local Audit Bill: Pre-legislative Scrutiny, Report of Session 2012–13, HC 696 (2 vols.), London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• ETR. 2004. Local Government Revenue. Ninth Report of the Session 2003–04. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• ETR (Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee). 2000. The Audit Commission: Tenth Report of the Session 1999–2000. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. 2002. “Prime Minister to Stand Firm in Cronyism Row over Minister’s Partner.” Financial Times, October 24.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 1993. “Policy Discourse and the Politics of Washington Think Tanks.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gains, F. 2011. “Elite Ethnographies: Potential, Pitfalls and Prospects for Getting ‘Up Close and Personal’.” Public Administration 89 (1): 156–166. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian. 2010. “Who Will Tackle Failure Now the Audit Commission Is Being Axed?” The Guardian. Accessed July 3, 2012. http://www.theguardian.com/society/joepublic/2010/aug/17/who-replace-axed-audit-commission
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1993. “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalisation of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2005. “Coalitions, Practices and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, edited by D. Howarth and J. Torfing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., I. Palmer, and N. Phillips. 2000. “Discourse as a Strategic Resource.” Human Relations 53 (9): 1227–1248. doi:10.1177/0018726700539006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2011. “Interpreting Interpretivism Interpreting Interpretations: The New Hermeneutics of Public Administration.” Public Administration 89 (1): 167–182. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010a. The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. Accessed July 2, 2012. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/coalition_programme_for_government.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010b. Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: An Essential Guide. Accessed July 2, 2012. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/1793908.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J. C. 2002. “A Scientific Approach to Politics? On the Trail of the Audit Commission.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13: 39–62. doi:10.1006/cpac.2000.0490.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, R. 2012. “Local Audit Contract Winners Revealed.” Public Finance. Accessed July 4. http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2012/03/local-audit-contract-winners-revealed/
   Google Scholar
• Kaffash, J. 2011. “Audit Commission Abolition Will Cost in the Long Term.” Public Finance. Accessed May 19, 2014. http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2010/08/audit-commission-abolition-will-cost-in-the-long-term-says-betts/
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. 2003. “The Audit Commission: Guiding, Steering and Regulating Local Government.” Public Administration 81 (3): 459–476. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and M. Schlesinger. 2005. “Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies.” Political Psychology 26 (1): 77–114. doi:10.1111/pops.2005.26.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and M. Rein. 2003. “Reframing Practice.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by H. Wagenaar and M. Hajer. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• LGC (Local Government Chronicle). 2010. “Labour MPs Attack Audit Commission Scrapping.” Local Government Chronicle, September 8.
   Google Scholar
• LGC. 2011. “The Challenge of Filling the Audit Commission’s Shoes.” Local Government Chronicle, March 3.
   Google Scholar
• LGC. 2006. “Did the Audit Commission Spin the CPA Results?” Local Government Chronicle, April 1.
   Google Scholar
• Liberal Democrats. 2010. Liberal Democrats: Our Manifesto. Accessed July 4, 2012. http://network.libdems.org.uk/manifesto2010/libdem_manifesto_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, N. 2001. “The Role of Storytelling and Narrative in a Modernisation Initiative.” Local Government Studies 27 (4): 35–58. doi:10.1080/714004123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1983. “Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government.” American Political Science Review 77 (2): 281–296. doi:10.2307/1958916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T. 2012. Governing Narratives: Symbolic Politics and Policy Change. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2006. “Ambiguity in Policy Lessons: The Agencification Experience.” Public Administration 84 (4): 1029–1050. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2001. Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). 2003. Local Government Act 1999: Part 1 - Best Value and Performance Improvement. ODPM Circular 03/2003. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.” Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman, S. P. 2011. “Resisting Governmental Control: How Agencies Use Strategic Resources to Challenge State Control.” Master thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, P. 2010. “Exploring Variations in the Political Discourse on Public Sector Reforms, 1981–2005.” Public Management Review 12 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/14719031003616073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2002. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” Governance 13 (4): 475–499. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Administration Select Committee (PASC). 2003. On Target? Government By Measurement. Fifth Report of the Session 2002–03. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., and D. Schön. 1993. “Reframing Policy Discourse.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2011. “Speaking of Change: Why Discourse is Key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 106–126. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576520.
   Google Scholar
• Smullen, A. 2010a. “Cultural Change or Cultural Paradox? the Continuities and Discontinuities in Dutch Official Agency Talk.” Critical Policy Studies 4 (2): 164–184. doi:10.1080/19460171.2010.490640.
   Google Scholar
• Smullen, A. 2010b. Translating Agency Reform: Rhetoric and Culture in Comparative Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2004. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telegraph. 2011. “Audit Commission Says It With Flowers.” Telegraph, August 9.
   Google Scholar
• Timmins, N., and T. Gash. 2014. Dying to Improve: The Demise of the Audit Commission and Other Improvement Agencies. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. 2012. “Framing and Counter-Framing New Public Management: The Case of Germany.” Public Administration 90 (2): 370–392. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2012. “Dwellers on the Threshold of Practice: The Interpretivism of Bevir and Rhodes.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (1): 85–99. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.659890.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. 2011. “Chronicle of a Death Foretold.” Public Money & Management 31 (1): 6–7. doi:10.1080/09540962.2011.545533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., and J. G. Christensen. 2010. “Institutional Design and Formal Autonomy: Political versus Historical and Cultural Explanations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., and J. De Vries. 2004. “Reform Styles of Political and Administrative Elites in Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies: Public Management Reforms in New Zealand and the Netherlands.” Public Administration 82 (4): 951–974. doi:10.1111/padm.2004.82.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar