The Economic and Political Impacts of Top-Down Territorial Reforms: The Case of Sub-City Governments

References

• Bel, G., and M. E. Warner. 2015. “Intermunicipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence.” Public Administration 93 (1): 52–67. doi:10.1111/padm.2015.93.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J. 1989. Territory and Administration in Europe. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C. 2008. “Piling On: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal Common-Pool.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 802–820. doi:10.1111/ajps.2008.52.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, R. L. 1971. The Public Economy of Metropolitan Areas. Chicago, IL: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Boadway, R., and A. Shah. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 1992. “Local Government Structure and Performance: Lessons from America?” Public Administration 70 (3): 333–357. doi:10.1111/padm.1992.70.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 1996. “Scale, Performance and the New Public Management: An Empirical Analysis of Local Authority Services.” Journal of Management Studies 33 (6): 809–826. doi:10.1111/joms.1996.33.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 1998. Public Choice Theory and Local Government. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J., and E. Stephenson. 2003. “Local Government Structure and Public Expenditures.” Public Choice 115: 185–198. doi:10.1023/A:1022857028836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, M. 1992. “Theories of Local Government Reorganization: An Empirical Evaluation.” Public Administration 70 (3): 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., and J. M. Buchanan. 1977. “Towards a Tax Constitution for Leviathan.” Journal of Public Economics 8 (3): 255–273. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(77)90001-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., and J. M. Buchanan. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, Y., and S. Taniyici. 2006. “Representativeness and Attitudes of Municipal Council Members in Turkey: The Case of Erzincan Province.” Local Government Studies 32 (4): 413–428. doi:10.1080/03003930600792930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., and S. Karuppusamy. 2010. “Reassessing the Link between City Structure and Fiscal Policy: Is the Problem Poor Measures of Governmental Structure?” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (2): 209–228. doi:10.1177/0275074009334641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., and A. Tavares. 2014. “City Size and Political Participation in Local Government: Reassessing the Contingent Effects of Residential Location Decisions within Urban Regions.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (2): 269–302. doi:10.1177/1078087413518171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coimbra, M. L., J. S. da Costa, and A. Carvalho. 2011. “Fiscal Competition among Portuguese Municipalities.” Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais 28 (3): 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Craw, M. 2008. “Taming the Local Leviathan: Institutional and Economic Constraints on Municipal Budgets.” Urban Affairs Review 43 (5): 663–690. doi:10.1177/1078087407311588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dente, B., and F. Kjellberg. 1988. The Dynamics of Institutional Change: Local Government Reorganization in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., J. Byrnes, and L. Crase. 2007. Economies of Scale and Population Size in Australian Local Government Structural Reform Programs (Working Paper No. 15-2007). Armidale, NSW: Centre for Local Government, University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and L. Crase. 2004. “Is Bigger Local Government Better? An Evaluation of the Case for Australian Municipal Amalgamation Programs.” Urban Policy and Research 22 (3): 265–275. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269290.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and E. Fleming. 2006. “A Conceptual Note on Scale Economies, Size Economies and Scope Economies in Australian Local Government.” Urban Policy and Research 24 (2): 271–282. doi:10.1080/08111140600704111.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., and T. Mergoupis. 2003. “Fragmentation, Fiscal Mobility and Efficiency.” The Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1190–1207. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2014. “Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program.” Local Government Studies. Early View. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.874341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drier, P., J. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom. 2004. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durning, D. 2003. “Consolidated Governments.” In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, edited by J. Rabin, 226–230. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R., and I. McMenamin. 2008. “Political Fragmentation, Fiscal Deficits and Political Institutionalisation.” Public Choice 136 (3–4): 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsi, M., A. Fetz, and M. Filippini. 2007. “Economies of Scale and Scope in Local Public Transportation.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 41 (3): 345–361.
   Google Scholar
• Farsi, M., A. Fetz, and M. Filippini. 2008. “Economies of Scale and Scope in Multi-utilities.” Energy Journal 29 (4): 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., and J. T. Scholz, eds. 2010. Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisken, F., and D. F. Norris. 2001. “Regionalism Reconsidered.” Journal of Urban Affairs 23 (5): 467–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. J. 1989. “Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size: An Extension.” Public Choice 62: 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustely, R. 1977. “The Allocational and Distributional Impacts of Governmental Consolidation: The Dade County Experience.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 12 (3): 349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. M., B. S. Jimenez, and K. Lal. 2011. “Does Local Government Fragmentation Reduce Local Spending?” Urban Affairs Review 47 (4): 467–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, W. 1968. “The Supply of Urban Public Services.” In Issues in Urban Economics, edited by H. Perloff and L. Wingo, 477–525. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and A. van Monfort, eds. 2007. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P., and D. L. Rubinfeld. 1997. “The Political Economy of Federalism.” In Perspectives on Public Choice, edited by D. C. Mueller, 73–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, F. 1985. “Local Government Reorganization and the Development of the Welfare State.” Journal of Public Policy 5 (2): 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. 2002. “Municipal Size and Democracy: A Critical Analysis of the Argument of Proximity Based on the Case of Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (4): 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. 2000. “A Transaction Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation versus Redistribution in Urban America.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (1): 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, L. 2008. “The Impact of Government Structure on Local Public Expenditures.” Public Choice 136: 457–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, M. L. 1988. “Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size.” Public Choice 56 (3): 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1968. “The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy.” American Economic Review 58 (2): 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Oakerson, R. J. 1999. Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1985. “Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study.” American Economic Review 75 (4): 748–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Governments in Metropolitan Areas.” American Political Science Review 55: 831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., B. Coyle-McCabe, and R. C. Feiock. 2010. “Direct Democracy Provisions and Local Government Fiscal Choices.” American Review of Public Administration 40 (4): 400–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. 1980. “Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation?” Journal of Legal Studies 9: 593–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. 1993. Cities without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, D. 1999. Inside Game Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A. 2000. Merger Mania. Montreal, QB: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. 1986. “Fragmentation and the Growth of Local Government.” Public Choice 48 (3): 255–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. 1989. “Intermunicipal Competition, Budget Maximizing Bureaucrats, and the Level of Suburban Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 612–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. 2004. Portugal: Local Government System. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona and Centre per la Innovació Local.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camões. 2007. “Local Service Delivery Choices in Portugal: A Transaction-Costs Framework.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 535–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camões. 2010. “New Forms of Local Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Municipal Corporations in Portugal.” Public Management Review 12 (5): 587–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and J. B. Carr. 2013. “So Close, Yet So Far Away? The Effects of City Size, Density, and Growth on Local Civic Participation.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (3): 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco, A. 2000. “Debts and Deficits with Fragmented Fiscal Policy Making.” Journal of Public Economics 76: 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Volkerink, B., and J. de Haan. 2001. “Fragmented Government Effects on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence.” Public Choice 109 (3–4): 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiher, G. 1991. The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R., K. A. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 642–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zax, J. S. 1989. “Is There a Leviathan in Your Neighborhood?” American Economic Review 79 (3): 560–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar