Welfare Loss with Municipal Amalgamations and the Willingness-to-Pay for the Municipality Name

References

• Adam, F. 2008. Des noms et des lieux: La médiation toponymique au Québec et en Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick. Paris: Université Paris IV.
   Google Scholar
• Anholt, S. 2006. “The Anholt-GMI City Brands Index: How the World Sees the World’s Cities.” Place Branding 2 (1): 18–31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990042.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Natural Resource Damage Assessment under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, D., and F. Fiorillo. 2008. “Local Council Partnerships: A Theoretical Approach.” In The Theory and Practice of Local Government Reform, edited by B. Dollery and L. Robotti, 53–68. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J., R. T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, and J. Swanson. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.1080/0042098984718.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1980. “L’identité et la représentation.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 35: 63–72. doi:10.3406/arss.1980.2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T. 2011. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren’t Available.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 27–42. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., K. J. Boyle, and T. C. Brown. 2003. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Vol. 3 of The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Debarbieux, B. 2006. “Prendre position: Réflexions sur les ressources et les limites de la notion d’identité en géographie.” Espace géographique 340–354: 4–35.
   Google Scholar
• Delattre, E. 2007. “Renaming the French «communes»: Economic, Marketing and Strategic Aspects.” Revue D’économie Régionale Et Urbaine 2: 269–291. doi:10.3917/reru.072.0269.
   Google Scholar
• Di Méo, G. D. 2007. “Identités et territoires: Des rapports accentués en milieu urbain?” Métropoles 1: 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B. E., and A. Akimov. 2009. “Shared Services in Australian Local Government: Rationale, Alternative Models and Empirical Evidence.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 68 (2): 208–219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00635.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesne, S. 2008. “Waiting for European Identity. Reflections on the Process of Identification with Europe.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1080/15705850802416796.
   Google Scholar
• Gaxie, D. 1990. “Au-delà des apparences. Sur quelques problèmes de mesure des opinions.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 81: 97–112. doi:10.3406/arss.1990.2929.
   Google Scholar
• Grosclaude, P., and N. Soguel. 1994. “Valuing Damage to Historic Buildings Using a Contingent Market: A Case Study of Road Traffic Externalities.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 37 (3): 279–287. doi:10.1080/09640569408711976.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J. M., B. E. Lindsay, and C. M. Brown. 1991. “Use of the Tobit Model in Contingent Valuation: Experimental Evidence from the Pemigewasset Wilderness Area.” Journal of Environmental Management 33 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80049-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes, N., M. Wikström, and E. Wångmar. 2012. “Municipal Preferences for State-Imposed Amalgamations: An Empirical Study Based on the Swedish Municipal Reform of 1952.” Urban Studies 49 (12): 2733–2750. doi:10.1177/0042098011429488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43–56. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., and N. Soguel. 2010. “Fiscal Federalism at the Ballot Box: The Relevance of Expressive Voting.” Review of Law and Economics 6 (3): 469–485. doi:10.2202/1555-5879.1536.
   Google Scholar
• Kavaratzis, M., and G. J. Ashworth. 2005. “City Branding: An Effective Assertion of Identity or a Transitory Marketing Trick?” Journal of Economic and Social Geography 96 (5): 506–514. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00482.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. N., and Y. Ma. 2000. “Local Authority Size in Theory and Practice.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (3): 255–270. doi:10.1068/c9856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and D. Gertner. 2002. “Country as Brand, Product, and Beyond: A Place Marketing and Brand Management Perspective.” Journal of Brand Management 9 (4): 249–261. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2005. “Citizens Satisfaction with Municipal Amalgamations.” Canadian Public Administration 48 (1): 73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bart, C. 1999. “Les politiques d’image: Entre marketing territorial et identité locale.” In Les nouvelles politiques locales: Dynamiques de l’action publique, edited by R. Balme, A. Faure, and A. Mabileau, 415–427. Paris: Presses de Science Po.
   Google Scholar
• Link, M. W., M. P. Battaglia, M. R. Frankel, L. Osborn, and A. Mokdad. 2007. “Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation. Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (5): 814–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• National Office of Local Government. 1998. Local Government National Report 1997–98. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Services.
   Google Scholar
• Pérés, H. 2001. “Identité nationale et sociologie de la connaissance. Notes pour une comparaison de la construction identitaire en France et en Espagne.” Pôle Sud 14: 57–71. doi:10.3406/pole.2001.1105.
   Google Scholar
• Silberstein, J., and N. Soguel. 2012. “Ex-Post Survey on the Consequences and Perceptions about Amalgamation.” Urban Public Economics Review 16: 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. 2003. “The Causes, Spread and Effects of Intermunicipal Cooperation and Municipal Mergers in Switzerland.” Public Management Review 5 (4): 551–571. doi:10.1080/1471903032000178581.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1983. “The Theory of Local Public Goods Twenty-Five Years after Tiebout: A Perspective.” In Local Provision of Public Services: The Tiebout Model after Twenty-Five Years, edited by G. R. Zodrow, 17–53. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar