569
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Shaping Political Preferences: Information Effects in Political-Administrative Systems

, &

References

  • Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.
  • Baekgaard, M. 2011. “Committee Bias in Legislatures with a High Degree of Party Cohesion: Evidence from Danish Municipalities.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (3): 315–335. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2011.50.issue-3.
  • Bennett, C. J., and M. Howlett. 1992. “The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25: 275–294. doi:10.1007/BF00138786.
  • Chong, D., and J. N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
  • Chong, D., and J. N. Druckman. 2010. “Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects Over Time.” American Political Science Review 104: 663–680. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000493.
  • Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 64: 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
  • Druckman, J. N., and K. R. Nelson. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 729–745. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051.
  • Druckman, J. N., E. Peterson, and R. Slothuus. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107: 57–79. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500.
  • Dunlop, C. A., and C. Radaelli. 2013. “Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions.” Political Studies 61: 599–619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x.
  • Freeman, R. 2006. “Learning in Public Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by M. Moran, M. Rein, and R. E. Goodin, 367–388. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gormley, W. T. 1986. “Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System.” Polity 18 (4): 595–620. doi:10.2307/3234884.
  • Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46: 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442.
  • Hall, P. A. 1989. “Conclusion: The Politics of Keynesian Ideas.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations, edited by A. H. Peter, 361–393. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
  • Heclo, H. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Howell, S. E., and C. L. Day. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–874. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00036.
  • Iyengar, S., and D. R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Jacobsen, D. I. 2006. “Public Sector Growth: Comparing Politicians’ and Administrators’ Spending Preferences.” Public Administration 84 (1): 185–204. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-1.
  • James, O., and M. Lodge. 2003. “The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research.” Political Studies Review 1: 179–193. doi:10.1111/psr.2003.1.issue-2.
  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185.
  • Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Lasswell, H. D. 1948. “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society.” In The Communication of Ideas, edited by L. Bryson. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • Nelson, T. E., R. A. Clawson, and Z. M. Oxley. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” The American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075.
  • Sabatier, P. A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21: 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406.
  • Serritzlew, S. 2003. “Shaping Local Councillor Preferences: Party Politics, Committee Structure and Social Background.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (4): 327–347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00092.x.
  • Shipan, C. R., and C. Volden. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review 72: 788–796.
  • Slothuus, R. 2008. “More than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual-Process Model of Issue Framing Effects.” Political Psychology 29 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x.
  • Sørensen, R. J. 1995. “The Demand for Local Government Goods: The Impact of Parties, Committees and Public-Sector Politicians.” European Journal of Political Research 27: 119–141. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00632.x.
  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683.
  • Vabo, S. I. 2005. “Committee Structure and Political Preferences: The Case of Norwegian Local Government.” European Journal of Political Research 44: 563–592. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00239.x.
  • Volden, C., M. M. Ting, and D. P. Carpenter. 2008. “A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion.” American Political Science Review 102: 319–332. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080271.
  • Waterman, R. W., and K. J. Meier. 1998. “Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 173–202. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377.
  • Wildavsky, A. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
  • Wood, B. D., and R. W. Waterman. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” The American Political Science Review 85 (3): 801–828. doi:10.2307/1963851.
  • Zito, A. R., and A. Schout. 2009. “Learning Theory Reconsidered: EU Integration Theories and Learning.” Journal of European Public Policy 16: 1103–1123. doi:10.1080/13501760903332597.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.