Co-producing safety in the local community: A Q-methodology study on the incentives of Belgian and Dutch members of neighbourhood watch schemes

References

• Alford, J. 2002. “Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?: Toward a Contingency Theory.” Administration & Society 34 (1): 32–56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Löffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-Production. How Users and Communities Contribute to Public Services.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 35–60. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., G. G. van Ryzin, E. Loeffler, and S. Parrado. 2015. “Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., and J. G. McNutt. 2010. “Virtual Government-Citizen Relations: Informational, Transactional, or Collaborative?” Administration & Society 42 (7): 836–858. doi:10.1177/0095399710386308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2015. “Distinguishing Different Types of Co-Production: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review, Published electronically on October 8 doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., S. C. Selden, and R. L. Facer II. 2000. “Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation.” Public Administration Review 60 (3): 254–264. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 1980. Political Subjectivity: Application of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 1993. “A Primer on Q Methodology.” Operant Subjectivity 16 (3/4): 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 2002. “Structural and Functional Information.” Policy Sciences 35: 285–304. doi:10.1023/A:1021358313052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R., D. W. Durning, and S. C. Selden. 2008. “Q Methodology.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, edited by G. J. Miller and K. Yang, 721–763. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• CCV [Centrum voor Criminaliteitspreventie en Veiligheid]. 2010. Buurtpreventie. <http://www.hetccv.nl/dossiers/wijkinterventies/buurtpreventie>.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., R. G. Niemi, and G. E. Silver. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337.
   Google Scholar
• De Redactie. 2016. Steeds meer buurtinformatienetwerken in ons land. Monday August 1.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and J. Berejikian. 1993. “Reconstructive Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 48–60. doi:10.2307/2938955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and L. T. Holmes. 2002. Post-Communist Democratization: Political Discourses across Thirteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Why People Co-Produce within Activation Services: The Necessity of Motivation and Trust – an Investigation of Selection Biases in a Municipal Activation Programme in the Netherlands.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 69-87. doi:10.1177/0020852314566006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guclu, T. 2010. “Use of Volunteers in Policing.” Telemasp Bulletin 17 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, J. 2009. “To catch a thief… Burgerschap in het leven van alledag.” Bestuurskunde 1: 68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. 2013. “Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (1): 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffares, S., and C. Skelcher. 2011. “Democratic Subjectivities in Network Governance: A Q-Methodology Study of English and Dutch Public Managers.” Public Administration 89 (4): 1253–1273. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappeler, V. E., and L. K. Gaines. 2015 [2011]. Community Policing. A Contemporary Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelling, G. L., and J. Q. Wilson. 1982. “The Police and Neighbourhood Safety: Broken Windows.” The Atlantic Monthly 249 (3): 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, J. D. 2000. “Partnerships. A ‘Community as Resource’ Strategy for Disaster Response.” Public Health Reports 115: 262–265. doi:10.1093/phr/115.2.262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lub, V. 2016. De burger op wacht. Het fenomeen ‘buurtpreventie’ onderzocht. Rotterdam: Kenniswerkplaats Leefbare Wijken.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2014. “New Media and the Coproduction of Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Practices.” The American Review of Public Administration 44 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1177/0275074012455843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1978. “Citizen Participation and Policing: What Do We Know?” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 7 (1–2): 102–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., R. B. Parks, and G. P. Whitaker. 1978. Patterns of Metropolitan Policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., and B. Guy Peters, edited by 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. Houndsmills: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., P. C. Baker, L. Kiser, R. Oakerson, E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom, S. L. Percy, M. B. Vandivort, G. P. Whitaker, and R. Wilson. 1981. “Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9 (7): 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/psj.1981.9.issue-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. L. 1978. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizen Co-Production of Community Safety.” Policy Studies Journal 7 (s1): 486–493. doi:10.1111/psj.1978.7.issue-s1.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 13–34. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, P., and L. K. Selbee. 2003. “Do People Who Volunteer Have A Dinstinctive Ethos? A Canadian Study.” In The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by P. Dekker and L. Halman, 91–109. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Scheider, M. C., R. Chapman, and A. Schapiro. 2009. “Towards the Unification of Policing Innovations under Community Policing.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 32 (4): 694–718. doi:10.1108/13639510911000777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B. 1978. “Citizen Organizations In Policing Issues and Crime Prevention: Incentives for Participation.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 7 (1–2): 45–58. doi:10.1177/089976407800700106.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T. 2006. “Public Sector Motivation: Is There Something to Learn from the Study of Volunteerism?” Public Policy and Administration 21 (1): 49–62. doi:10.1177/095207670602100104.
   Google Scholar
• Sundeen, R. A., and G. B. Siegel. 1987. “The Community and Departmental Contexts of Volunteer Use by Police.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 16 (3): 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Thijssen, P., and W. Van Dooren. 2016. “Who You Are/Where You Live: Do Neighbourhood Characteristics Explain Co-Production?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 88-109.  doi:10.1177/0020852315570554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Land, M. 2014. De buurtwacht. Naar een balans tussen instrumentalisering en autonomie van burgers in veiligheid. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., and T. P. S. Steen. 2013. “Waarom burgers coproducent willen zijn. Een theoretisch model om de motivaties van coproducerende burgers te verklaren.” Bestuurskunde 22 (4): 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., and T. P. S. Steen. 2016. “Why Engage in Co-Production of Public Services? Mixing Theory and Empirical Evidence.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1177/0020852314566007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., and T. P. S. Steen. 2014. “Why People Co-Produce: Analysing Citizens’ Perceptions on Co-Planning Engagement in Health Care Services.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 358–382. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Exel, J., G. De Graaf, and W. Brouwer. 2007. “Care for a Break? An Investigation of Informal Caregivers’ Attitudes toward Respite Care Using Q-Methodology.” Health Policy 83: 332–342. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Exel, J., and G. De Graaf. 2005. “Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview.” Electronic article published at <http://www.qmethodology.net/index.php?page=1&year=2005>.
   Google Scholar
• Veldheer, V., J.-J. Jonker, L. van Noije, and C. Vrooman. 2012. Een beroep op de burger. Minder verzorgingsstaat, meer eigen verantwoordelijkheid? Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 2012. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., T. Brandsen, and V. Pestoff. 2012. “Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” Voluntas 23 (4): 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., M. LePere-Schloop, P. D. Silk, and A. Hebdon. 2016. “The Co-Production of Campus Safety and Security: A Case Study at the University of Georgia.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 110-130. doi:10.1177/0020852315573157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., and S. Jeffares. 2012. “Four Viewpoints of Whole Area Public Partnerships.” Local Government Studies 38 (5): 539–556. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.615836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid [Scientific Council for Government Policy]). 2012. Vertrouwen in Burgers. Den Haag: WRR /Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. S., C. Gibson, N. Lovrich, and M. Gaffney. 2002. “Participation in Community Crime Prevention: Are Volunteers More or Less Fearful of Crime than Other Citizens?” Journal of Crime & Justice 25 (1): 41–61. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2002.9721144.
   Google Scholar