Bridging the accountability and transparency gap in inter-municipal collaboration

References

• Alcantara, C., R. Leone, and Z. Spicer. 2012. “Responding to Policy Change from Above: Municipal Accountability and Transparency Regimes in Ontario.” Journal of Canadian Studies 46: 112–137. doi:10.3138/jcs.46.1.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcantara, C., Z. Spicer, and R. Leone. 2012. “Institutional Design and the Accountability Paradox: A Case Study of Three Aboriginal Accountability Regimes in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 55(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. 2008. Governance by Agreements: Why Do Local Governments Enter into Multilateral Agreements. Detroit, MI: Working Group on Interlocal Services Cooperation, Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. 2009. “Recent Developments in the Study of Interjurisdictional Agreements: An Overview and Assessment.” State and Local Government Review 41: 133–142. doi:10.1177/0160323X0904100208.
   Google Scholar
• Arganoff, R., and M. Michael. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, R. E. 2000. “Party Manifestos and Local Accountability: A Content Analysis of Local Election Pledges in Wales.” Local Government Studies 26: 11–30. doi:10.1080/03003930008433997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, P. 1997. “Local Intergovernmental Agreements: Strategies for Cooperation.” International City/County Management Association Management Information System Report 29 (7): 1-19
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P., and R. Heintzman. 2000. “The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 66: 45–55. doi:10.1177/0020852300661005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P., and M. D. Jarvis. 2005. Modernizing Government Accountability: A Framework for Reform. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. A. 1997. “Concentrated Poverty and Metropolitan Equity Strategies.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 8 (2): 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Borys, B., and D. Jemison. 1989. “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations.” Academy of Management Review 14: 234–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2007. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal 13: 447–468. doi:10.1111/eulj.2007.13.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J., and T. Schillemans. 2012. “The Accountability Cube: Measuring Accountability.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 953–975. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2005. “Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance and Management Review 28 (3): 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Bundt, J. 2000. “Strategic Stewards: Managing Accountability, Building Trust.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 757–778. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024290.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, F. H., and F. C. Sharp. 1992. Popular Reporting: Local Government Financial Reports to the Citizenry. Samford, CT: Governmental Accounting Board.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, B. W., and R. H. Phillips. 2004. “GASB 34 and Government Financial Condition: An Analytical Toolbox.” Government Finance Review 20: 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M. 2002. “The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined-Up Services.” Governance 15: 21–40. doi:10.1111/gove.2002.15.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachis, B. 2010. “Picking up Savings: The Benefits of Competition in Municipal Waste Services.” In C.D. Howe Institute Commentary. Toronto: C.D. Hose Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Day, P., and R. Klein. 1987. Accountabilities: Five Public Sectors. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Dicke, L. A. 2002. “Ensuring Accountability in Human Services Contracting: Can Stewardship Theory Fill the Bill?” American Review of Public Administration 32: 455–470. doi:10.1177/027507402237870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., B. Grant, and M. Kortt. 2012. Councils in Cooperation: Shared Services and Australian Local Government. Sydney: The Federated Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, D., and J. Legge. 2001. “US Local Government Managers and the Complexity of Responsibility and Accountability in Democratic Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11: 73–88. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., and E. Weisband, eds. 2007. Global Accountabilities: Participation, Pluralism and Public Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, and B. Manin. 1999 “Accountability in Athenian Politics.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, eds. Adam Przeworski, Susan Stokes and Bernard Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. L. 2010. “Factors Influencing Special Purpose Service Delivery Among Counties.” Public Performance & Management Review 33 (4): 535–554. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Types.” In Democracy, Accountability and Responsibility, eds A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, and B. Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2004. “Introduction.” In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition and Cooperation, eds. R. C. Feiock. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41: 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., and J. Carr. 2001. “Incentives, Entrepreneurs, and Boundary Change: A Collective Action Framework.” Urban Affairs Review 36: 382–405. doi:10.1177/10780870122184902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, J. 2001. “Bridging the City-Suburb Divide: States and the Politics of Regional Cooperation.” Journal of Urban Affairs 23 (5): 497–512. doi:10.1111/juaf.2001.23.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, P., J. M. Simmons, and L. A. White. 2013. “Introduction: Accountability and Governance.” In Overpromising and Underperforming? Understanding and Evaluating New Intergovernmental Accountability Regimes, Eds P. Graefe, J. M. Simmons, and L. A. White. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. W., and R. O. Keohane. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (01, February): 29–43. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051476.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., and H. Singh. 1998. “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances.” In Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43. No. 4
   Google Scholar
• Hannretty, C., and C. Koop. 2011. “Measuring the Formal Independence of Regulatory Agencies.” Journal of European Public Policy 19: 198–216. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.607357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and V. M. Andre. 2008. “Intermunicipal Cooperation: A Widespread Phenomenon.” In Intermunicipal Cooperation in Europe, eds R. Hulst and A. Van Montfort. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., A. Van Montfort, A. Haveri, J. Airaksinen, and J. Kelly. 2009. “Institutional Shifts in Inter-Municipal Service Delivery.” Public Organization Review 9 (3): 263–285. doi:10.1007/s11115-009-0085-8.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, S. 2007. “The Structure of the Indian Act: Accountability in Governance.” Research Paper for the National Centre for First Nations Governance. Ottawa: National Centre for First Nations Governance
   Google Scholar
• Justice, J. B., J. Melitski, and D. L. Smith. 2006. “E-Government as an Instrument of Fiscal Accountability and Responsiveness: Do the Best Practitioners Employ the Best Practices.” American Review of Public Administration 36: 301–322. doi:10.1177/0275074005283797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-E. 2005. “Balancing Competing Accountability Requirements: Challenges in Performance Improvement of the Nonprofit Human Service Agency.” Public Performance and Management Review 29: 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, H. M., and E. Slack. 2003. “Special Study: New Finance Options for Municipal Governments.” Canadian Tax Journal 51: 2216–2272.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. 2005. “Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.” Public Administration Review 65: 94–108. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S.-W., and R. Feiock. 2010. “Overcoming the Barriers to Cooperation: Intergovernmental Service Agreements.” Public Administration Review 70 (6): 876–884. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamothe, M., and S. Lamothe. 2009. “Beyond the Search for Competition in Social Service Contracting: Procurement, Consolidation and Accountability.” American Review of Public Administration 39: 164–188. doi:10.1177/0275074008316557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. 2007. “Nonprofits as Civic Intermediaries: The Role of Community Based Organizations in Promoting Political Participation,”.” Urban Affairs Review 42 (3): 410–422. doi:10.1177/1078087406292257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, E.Jr., M. L. McMillan, and N. Hepburn. 2008. “Municipal Shared Service Collaboration in the Alberta Capital Region: The Case of Recreation.” Canadian Public Administration 51: 455–473. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00033.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. “Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 148. doi:10.2307/3088419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. R. 2014. Structural Variation and Local Service Delivery: Comparing Municipal Governments and Special Purpose Bodies. PhD Dissertation. London, ON: The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 2005. “Power and Political Institutions.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 215–233. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050176.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrieffe, J. M. 1998. “Reconceptualizing Political Accountability.” International Political Science Review 19 (4): 387–406. doi:10.1177/019251298019004004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., and C. Alcantara. 2011. “Strengthening the Ties that Bind? an Analysis of Aboriginal-Municipal Inter-Governmental Agreements in British Columbia.” Canadian Public Administration 54: 315–334. doi:10.1111/capa.2011.54.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., and C. Alcantara. 2014. “Explaining the Emergence of Indigenous-Local Intergovernmental Relations in Settler Societies: A Theoretical Framework.” Urban Affairs Review 50: 599–622. doi:10.1177/1078087413501638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles, J. 2009. Civic Capital and the Dynamics of Intermunicipal Cooperation for Regional Economic Development. PhD Thesis: The University of Toronto, Department of Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, A. 1993. Municipal Consolidation in Canada and Its Alternatives. Toronto: Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, L., J.-E. Yusuf, and M. Hackbart. 2009. “Transportation Commissions as Accountability Structures: A Review of Their Statutory Roles and Other Attributes.” American Review of Public Administration 39: 409–424. doi:10.1177/0275074008321892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olberding, J. C. 2002. “Does Regionalism Beget Regionalism? The Relationship between Norms and Regional Partnerships for Economic Development.” Public Administration Review 62 (4): 480–491. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B. M. 1983. “Responsiveness versus Accountability in Collaborative Federalism: The Canadian Experience.” Canadian Public Administration 26 (4): 629–639. doi:10.1111/capa.1983.26.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. London: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Post, S. 2004. “Metropolitan Area Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition and Cooperation, eds. R. C. Feiock. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, F., and K. Shaw; associates. 2000. Who Runs the North-East Now? A Review and Assessment of Governance in North East England. Department of Sociology and Social Policy. Durham: University of Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B., and M. Dubnick. 1998. “Accountability.” In International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, ed. J. M. Shafritz, 6–11. A-C. Vol. 1. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I. 1996. “Budgeting for Accountability: Municipal Budgeting for the 1990s.” Public Budgeting and Finance 16: 112–132. doi:10.1111/1540-5850.01071.
   Google Scholar
• Sancton, A., R. James, and R. Ramsay. 2000. Amalgamation Vs. Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Financing Local and Infrastructure Services. Toronto: Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. 1995. “The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20: 219–237. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0003-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. 2004 “Hybrids: Implications of New Corporate Forms for Public Service Performance,” Paper delivered to the British Academy of Management Conference, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., N. Mathur, and M. Smith. 2005. “The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy.” Public Administration 83: 573–596. doi:10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, E. 1993. “Comments on Efficiency of Delivering Local Government Services under Alternative Organizational Modes.” In Competitiveness and Delivery of Public Services, eds R. Crowley. Kingston: Government and Competitiveness Project, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, E. 1997. Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Sharing of Expenditures and Revenues. Toronto: Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, Z. 2014. “Linking Regions, Linking Functions: Inter-Municipal Agreements in Ontario.” In IMFG Perspectives 10. Toronto: Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, Z. 2015. “Regionalism, Municipal Organization and Inter-Local Cooperation in Canada.” Canadian Public Policy 41: 137–150. doi:10.3138/cpp.2014-078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størm, K. 1997. “Democracy, Accountability and Coalition Bargaining.” European Journal of Political Research 31: 47–62. doi:10.1023/A:1006856818727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher. 2002. Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. 1980. “Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands.” American Political Science Review 74: 905–916. doi:10.2307/1954312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, J. 2004. “Townships and Nested Governance: Spoilers or Collaborators in Metropolitan Services Delivery.” Public Performance and Management Review 27 (3): 80-101.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. 2002. “Assessing Administrative Accountability: Results from a National Survey.” American Review of Public Administration 32: 350–370. doi:10.1177/0275074002032003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. 2006. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation in the US: A Regional Governance Solution?” Urban Public Economics Review 6: 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. R. 1990. Financial Reporting by State and Local Governments: A Survey of Preferences among Alternative Formats. Stamford, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making Collaboration Work. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar