Estimating policy positions of local parties in elections with multi-vote ballots

References

• Aars, J., and H. E. Ringkjob. 2005. “Party Politicisation Reversed? Non-Partisan Alternatives in Norwegian Local Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (2): 161–181. doi:10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00126.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H. 2003. “Explaining and Predicting Coalition Outcomes: Conclusions from Studying Data on Local Coalitions.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (4): 441–472. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H. 2008. “Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Formation: Evidence from Swedish Local Government.” Party Politics 14 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1177/1354068807081818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. 2007. “Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 433–448. doi:10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., E. J. Ringquist, R. C. Fording, and R. L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–348. doi:10.2307/2991759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornschier, S. 2010. “The New Cultural Divide and the Two-Dimensional Political Space in Western Europe.” West European Politics 33 (3): 419–444. doi:10.1080/01402381003654387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., and B. Groman, eds. 2000. Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malte under the Single Transferable Vote. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., J. B. Lewis, J. Lo, K. T. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2009. “Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of Difference and Monte Carlo Tests.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (4): 555–591. doi:10.3162/036298009789869727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. 2009. “Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976-1998.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, J., S. Jackman, and D. Rivers. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll All Data.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–370. doi:10.1017/S0003055404001194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., and S. Feldman. 1982. “Projection and the Perception of Candidates’ Issue Positions.” Western Political Quarterly 35 (2): 228–244. doi:10.2307/448017.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, F. 2008. “One Voter, Two First-Order Elections?” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 492–504. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, M., and M. Gross. 2016. “Coalition Formation at the Local Level: Institutional Constraints, Party Policy Conflict, and Office-Seeking Political Parties.” Party Politics 22 (6): 835–846. doi:10.1177/1354068815576292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desposato, S. W. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 62–80. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egner, B., D. Sweeting, and P.-J. Klok. 2013. Local Councillors in Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Enelow, J., and M. J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eschenburg, T. 1964. Zur Politischen Praxis in Der Bundesrepublik. München: Piper.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, M. J., and J. D. Huber. 2000. “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 94–103. doi:10.2307/2669295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. R., and D. J. Hopkins. 2011. “When Mayors Matter. Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 326–339. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00499.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2014. “Koalitionsbildung in Deutschen Großstädten: Empirische Befunde Aus Nordrhein-Westfalen.” Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 24 (1–2): 109–146. doi:10.5771/1430-6387-2014-1-2-109.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, S., and R. Hilmer. 2013. “Backbord Oder Steuerbord: Wo Stehen Die Piraten Politisch?” In Die Piratenpartei, edited by O. Niedermayer, 75–80. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, A., I. McLean, B. Taylor, and J. Curtice. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1999.35.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke, A. 1997. “Kumulieren Und Panaschieren.” In Politische Kultur Und Wahlverhalten in Einer Großstadt, edited by O. W. Gabriel, F. Brettschneider, and A. Vetter, 169–179. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hinich, M. J., and M. C. Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtkamp, L. 2008. Kommunale Konkordanz- Und Konkurrenzdemokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., R. Bakker, A. Brigevich, C. D. Vries, E. Edwards, G. Marks, J. Rovny, M. Steenbergen, and M. Vachudova. 2010. “Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 687–703. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., D. A. Kenny, and J. A. Krosnick. 1983. “Judging the Positions of Political Candidates: Models of Assimilation and Contrast.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (5): 952–963. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher Palus, C. 2010. “Responsiveness in American Local Governments.” State and Local Government Review 42 (2): 133–150. doi:10.1177/0160323X10365847.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U., and J. Elklit. 2010. “Local Party System Nationalisation: Does Municipal Size Matter?” Local Government Studies 36 (3): 425–444. doi:10.1080/03003931003730451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koepke, J. R., and N. Ringe. 2006. “The Second-Order Election Model in an Enlarged Europe.” European Union Politics 7 (3): 321–346. doi:10.1177/1465116506066259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T., M. Marbach, and M. Osnabrügge. 2013. “Estimating Party Positions across Countries and Time: A Dynamic Latent Variable Model for Manifesto Data.” Political Analysis 21 (4): 468–491. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2006.45.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, W., K. Benoit, S. Mikhaylov, and M. Laver. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 123–155. doi:10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, G. 2010. “First Come, First Served: The Effect of Ballot Position on Electoral Success in Open Ballot PR Elections.” Representation 46 (2): 167–181. doi:10.1080/00344893.2010.485808.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, G., and K. Benoit. 2009. “Party Group Switching in the European Parliament.” In Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching, edited by W. B. Heller and C. Mershon, 148–172. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, F., and J. Wheatley. 2014. “Using VAA-Generated Data for Mapping Partisan Supporters in the Ideological Space.” In Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates, edited by D. Garzia and S. Marschall, 161–173. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, S. I. I. I., B. Grofman, and J. Adams. 2001. “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Voter Projections of Party Locations: Evidence from Norway, France, and the USA. European.” Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 199–221. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munzert, S., C. Rubba, P. Meißner, and D. Nyhuis. 2014. Automated Data Collection with R. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nachtwey, O. 2013. “Market Social Democracy: The Transformation of the SPD up to 2007.” German Politics 22 (3): 235–252. doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.788153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhuis, D. 2014. “Mehr Stimmen Gleich Bessere Demokratische Qualität? Negative Effekte Der Komplexität Des Wahlrechts Auf Die Zusammensetzung Der Wählerschaft.” Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 24 (3): 255–280. doi:10.5771/1430-6387-2014-3.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhuis, D. 2016. “Electoral Effects of Candidate Valence.” Electoral Studies 42: 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., and M. Schlögl, 2014. Europäische Und Zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe Der Euro(Pa)Skeptischen Partei Alternative Für Deutschland (Afd). WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP III 2014-501. Berlin: WZB.
   Google Scholar
• Pogorelis, R., B. Maddens, W. Swenden, and E. Fabre. 2005. “Issue Salience in Regional and National Party Manifestos in the UK.” West European Politics 28 (5): 992–1014. doi:10.1080/01402380500310667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2005. “Not All ‘Second-Order’ Contests are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 584–597. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00207.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rapeli, L. 2014. “Comparing Local, National and EU Knowledge: The Ignorant Public Reassessed.” Scandinavian Political Studies 37 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1111/scps.2014.37.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 1997. “Preferential Voting and Political Engineering: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 35 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/14662049708447736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, M. 2006. “Kommunale Wählergemeinschaften in Ost- Und Westdeutschland: Eine Analyse Zur Präsenz Der Parteifreien Gruppierungen in Vier Bundesländern.” In Kleine Parteien Im Aufwind, edited by U. Jun, H. Kreikenbom, and V. Neu, 277–297. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, M., and E. Holtmann. 2009. “Alter Und Neuer Lokalismus: Zur Rolle Und Bedeutung Parteifreier Kommunaler Wählergemeinschaften in Deutschland.” In Kommunalreform in Deutschland Und Japan, edited by G. Foljanty-Jost, 189–219. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., H. D. Clarke, M. C. Stewart, and P. Whiteley. 2011. “Downs, Stokes and the Dynamics of Electoral Choice.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 287–314. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., and S. Roßteutscher. 2015. “Räumliche Unterschiede Der Wahlbeteiligung Bei Der Bundestagswahl 2013: Die Soziale Topografie Der Nichtwahl.” In Die Bundestagswahl 2013, edited by K.-R. Korte, 98–118. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., and C. Jeffery. 2013. “Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections?” Regional Studies 47 (3): 323–341. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.690069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, M., and S. Marschall. 2012. “Voting Advice Applications and Their Effects on Voter Turnout: The Case of the German Wahl-O-Mat.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 5 (3/4): 349–366. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2012.051314.
   Google Scholar
• Shaker, L. 2012. “Local Political Knowledge and Assessments of Citizen Competence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 525–537. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikano, S. 2008. “Die Eigendynamik Zur Eindimensionalität Des Parteienwettbewerbs: Eine Simulationsstudie.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49 (2): 229–250. doi:10.1007/s11615-008-0098-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjaeveland, A., S. Serritzlew, and J. Blom-Hansen. 2007. “Theories of Coalition Formation: An Empirical Test Using Data from Danish Local Government.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (5): 721–745. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., and S. O. Proksch. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 705–722. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadt Heidelberg. 2014. Kommunalwahl 2014 in Heidelberg. Heidelberg: Stadt Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Tausanovitch, C., and C. Warshaw. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 605–641. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. 2011. “Evidence of a Local Incumbency Advantage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (2): 255–280. doi:10.1111/lsq.2011.36.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2013. “(Nationale) Parteien in Der Lokalen Politik: Wandel Oder Krise?” In Lokale Politik Und Verwaltung Im Zeichen Der Krise? edited by M. Haus and S. Kuhlmann, 27–48. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, H.-G. 1991. “Parteipolitisierung Von Lokaler Politik Und Verwaltung? Zur Rolle Der Parteien in Der Kommunalpolitik.” In Brennpunkt Stadt, edited by H. Heinelt and H. Wollmann, 149–166. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., J. Strate, and A. Melchior. 1996. “Does Changing Mayors Matter?” Journal of Politics 58 (1): 201–223. doi:10.2307/2960355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar