1,502
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Political participation and municipal population size: A meta-study

References

  • Allers, M. 2013. “Decentralisatie En Gemeentelijke Opschaling.” Liberaal Reveil 56 (2): 119–124.
  • Beck, P. A., and M. K. Jennings. 1982. “Pathways to Participation.” The American Political Science Review 76 (1): 94–108. doi:10.1017/S000305540018606X.
  • Berghuis, J., M. Herweijer, and W. Pol. 1995. Effecten Van Herindeling. Deventer: Kluwer.
  • Berinsky, A. J., and G. S. Lenz. 2010. “Education and Political Participation: Exploring the Causal Link.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 1–17.
  • Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew En, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 812–831. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
  • Bovens, M., and A. Wille. 2010. Diplomademocratie: Over De Spanning Tussen Meritocratie En Democratie. Den Haag: Prometheus-Bert Bakker.
  • Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42 (June): 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
  • Caren, N. 2007. “Big City, Big Turnout? Electoral Participation in American Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1111/juaf.2007.29.issue-1.
  • Carr, J., and A. Tavares. 2014. ““City Size and Political Participation in Local Government: Reassessing the Contingent Effects of Residential Location Decisions within Urban Regions.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (2): 269–302. doi:10.1177/1078087413518171.
  • Dagger, R. 1981. “Metropolis, Memory, and Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 715–737. doi:10.2307/2110760.
  • Dahl, R. 1967. “The City in the Future Democracy.” American Political Science Review 61 (4): 953–970. doi:10.2307/1953398.
  • Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • De Rynck, F., J. Voets, and E. Wayenberg. 2011. “Schalen in België.” Bestuurskunde 20 (4): 29–37.
  • Denters, B., M. J. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. Mouritzen, and L. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Denters, S. A. H., and P. A. T. M. Geurts. 1998. Lokale Democratie in Nederland: Burgers En Hun Gemeentebestuur. Bussum: Coutinho.
  • Dollery, B., and L. Crase. 2004. “Is Bigger Local Government Better? an Evaluation of the Case for Australian Municipal Amalgamation Programs.” Urban Policy and Research 22 (3): 265–275. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269290.
  • Drechsler, W. 2013. “Coercive Municipal Amalgamation Today–With Illustrations from Estonia–.” Administrative Culture, no. 14 (1): 158–167.
  • Fletcher, A., G. Elder, and D. Mekos. 2000. “Parental Influences on Adolescent Involvement in Community Activities.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 10 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1207/jra.2000.10.issue-1.
  • Fowler, J., L. Baker, and C. Dawes. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 233–248. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080209.
  • Frandsen, A. 2002. “Size and Electoral Participation in Local Elections.” Environment and Planning C 20 (6): 853–870. doi:10.1068/c0228.
  • Haddad, M. A. 2007. Politics and Volunteering in Japan: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hansen, S. 2015. “The Democratic Costs of Size: How Increasing Size Affects Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government.” Political Studies 63 (2): 373–389. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12096.
  • Hendriks, F. 2009. “Democratie in Zwitserland: Een Voorbeeld Voor Nederland?” Bestuurskunde 18 (4): 58–69.
  • Hirota, H., and Y. Hideo. 2014. “Municipal Mergers and Special Provisions of Local Council Members in Japan.” The Japanese Political Economy 40 (3–4): 96–116. doi:10.1080/2329194X.2014.1006453.
  • Holbrook, T., and A. Weinschenk. 2014. “Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1177/1065912913494018.
  • Horiuchi, Y., J. Saito, and K. Yamada. 2015. “Removing Boundaries, Losing Connections: Electoral Consequences of Local Government Reform in Japan.” Journal of East Asian Studies 15 (1): 99–125. doi:10.1017/S1598240800004185.
  • Jennings, M., L. Stoker, and J. Bowers. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782–799. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090719.
  • Kaniovski, S., and D. C. Mueller. 2006. ““Community Size, Heterogeneity and Voter Turnouts.” Public Choice 129 (3–4): 399–415. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9063-7.
  • Kelleher, C., and D. Lowery. 2004. “Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts.” Urban Affairs Review 39 (6): 720–757. doi:10.1177/1078087404264219.
  • Kesselman, M. 1966. “French Local Politics: A Statistical Examination of Grass Roots Consensus.” The American Political Science Review 60 (4): 963–973. doi:10.2307/1953769.
  • Kunz, R., J. Moeller, F. Esser, and C. De Vreese (2013). “Mobilizing Referenda: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Youth Political Participation.” Nr. 56, NCCR working paper 2013.
  • Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2003. “Citizens’ Attitudes toward Municipal Amalgamation in Three Ontario Municipalities.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 26 (1): 49–60.
  • Ladner, A. 2002. “Size and Direct Democracy at the Local Level: The Case of Switzerland.” Environment and Planning C 20 (6): 813–828. doi:10.1068/c0226.
  • Ladner, A. (2008). “Die Schweizer Gemeinden Im Wandel: Politische Institutionen Und Lokale Politik.” Cahier de L’IDHEAP Nr. 237, Chavannes-près-Renens.
  • Larsen, C. 2002. “Municipal Size and Democracy: A Critical Analysis of the Argument of Proximity Based on the Case of Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (4): 317–332. doi:10.1111/scps.2002.25.issue-4.
  • Morlan, R. L. 1982. “Sub-Municipal Governance in Practice: The Rotterdam Experience.” The Western Political Quarterly 35 (3): 425–441. doi:10.2307/447555.
  • Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal Vs. National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2149943.
  • Mustillo, S., J. Wilson, and S. Lynch. 2004. “Legacy Volunteering: A Test of Two Theories of Intergenerational Transmission.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (2): 530–541. doi:10.1111/jomf.2004.66.issue-2.
  • Okamoto, M. (2012). “Municipal Amalgamation in Japan: Who Is Happy?”: IPSA-Wold.
  • Oliver, J. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi:10.2307/2586017.
  • Peters, K. 2014. “Decentralisaties in Het Lokaal Bestuur: Bestuurlijke Lessen Uit Denemarken.” Beleid En Maatschappij 41 (1): 80–88. doi:10.5553/benm/138900692014041001013.
  • Pharr, S. 2000. “Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies.” In Dissaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries (pp. 173-201), eds S. J. Pharr, and R. D. Putnam, Princeton:Princeton university press.
  • Poel, D. 2000. “Amalgamation Perspectives: Citizen Responses to Municipal Consolidation.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 23 (1): 31–48.
  • Remmer, K. 2010. “Political Scale and Electoral Turnout: Evidence from the Less Industrialized World.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (3): 275–303. doi:10.1177/0010414009352638.
  • Rose, L. E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Environment and Planning C 20 (6): 829–852. doi:10.1068/c0227.
  • Sancton, A. 2000. Merger Mania. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Simmel, G. 1903. “The Metropolis and Mental Life. In The Blackwell City Reader 2002, eds. G. Bridge and S. Watson, 11-19. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Tavares, A., and J. Carr. 2013. “So Close, yet so Far Away? the Effects of City Size, Density, and Growth on Local Civic Participation.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1111/juaf.2013.35.issue-3.
  • Tolbert, C. J., R. S. McNeal, and D. A. Smith. 2003. “Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1177/153244000300300102.
  • Ulbig, S. 2008. “Voice Is Not Enough.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (3): 523–539. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn030.
  • Valentino, N., K. Gregorowicz, and E. Groenendyk. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 307–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7.
  • Van Houwelingen, P. 2016. “Indicatoren Voor Sociale Cohesie. Het Speciale Geval Van Japan En Zijn Implicaties`.” Mens En Maatschappij 2 (91): 153–171. doi:10.5117/MEM2016.2.HOUW.
  • Van Houwelingen, P., A. Boele, and P. Dekker. 2014. Burgermacht Op Eigen Kracht? Een Brede Verkenning Van Ontwikkelingen in Burgerparticipatie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  • Verba, S., N. H. Nie, and J. Kim. 1979. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Wirth, L. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” Journal of Sociology 44 (1): 1–24.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.