How do municipal amalgamations affect turnout in local elections? Insights from the 2015 municipal reform in the Austrian state of Styria

References

• Allers, M. A., and B. van Ommeren. 2016. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Municipal Amalgamation and the Price of Credit.” Local Government Studies 42 (5): 717–738. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1171754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcelus, F. J., P. Arocena, F. Cabasés, and P. Pascual. 2013. “On the Cost-Efficiency of Service Delivery in Small Municipalities.” Regional Studies 49 (9): 1469–1480. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.837872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., C. Jensen, P. B. Mortensen, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Local News Media and Voter Turnout.” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 518–532. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.834253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., and K. Hansen. 2010. “Kommunalreformens Betydning for Den Kommunale Valgdeltagelse.” Tidsskriftet Politik 12 (3): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. H. 1974. “Socio-Economic Determinism of Voting Turnout: A Challenge.” Journal of Politics 36 (3): 731–752. doi:10.2307/2129253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 790–803. doi:10.1111/ajps.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, D. L., and M. E. Kahn. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist’s Perspective.” Perspective on Politics 1 (1): 103–111. doi:10.1017/S1537592703000082.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, F., and J. S. Matthews. 2005. “The Challenge of Municipal Voting: Vancouver 2002.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 359–382. doi:10.1017/S0008423905040151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., E. Claes, and M. S. Lewis-Beck. 2016. “Punishing Local Incumbents for the Local Economy: Economic Voting in the 2012 Belgian Municipal Elections.” Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 46 (01): 3–22. doi:10.1017/ipo.2015.26.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and L. Crase. 2004. “Is Bigger Local Government Better? An Evaluation of the Case for Australian Municipal Amalgamation Programs.” Urban Policy and Research 22 (3): 265–275. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269290.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Feddersen, T. J., and W. Pesendorfer. 1996. “The Swing Voter’s Curse.” American Economic Review 86 (3): 408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornos, C. A., T. J. Power, and J. C. Garand. 2004. “Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (8): 909–940. doi:10.1177/0010414004267981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag, M. 1996. “Wahlbeteiligung in westlichen Demokratien. Eine Analyse zur Erklärung von Niveauunterschieden.” Swiss Political Science Review 2 (4): 1–36. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.1996.tb00186.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M. 2006. “Television and Voter Turnout.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (3): 931–972. doi:10.1162/qjec.121.3.931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B. 2006. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research.” Electoral Studies 25 (4): 637–663. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghirardato, P., and J. N. Katz. 2006. “Indecision Theory: Quality Of Information and Voting Behavior.” Journal Of Public Economic Theory 8 (3): 379–399. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00269.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2013. “Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-Experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W., K. Houlberg, and L. H. Pedersen. 2014. “Do Municipal Mergers Improve Fiscal Outcomes?” Scandinavian Political Studies 37 (2): 196–214. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., and S. C. McKee. 2009. “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 1006–1023. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R., and A. Mühlböck. 2016. “Auf die Größe kommt es an! Neue Empirische Evidenz zur Wahlbeteiligung in Gemeinden.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 10 (2): 165–190. doi:10.1007/s12286-016-0307-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. M. 2006. “Are Marginalized Communities Disenfranchised? Voter Turnout and Representation in Post-Merger Toronto.” IRPP Working Paper Series 2006–03, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “Electoral Vulnerability and Size of Local Governments: Evidence from Voting on Municipal Mergers.” Journal of Public Economics 120: 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. K., and R. G. Niemi. 1966. “Party Identification at Multiple Levels of Government.” American Journal of Sociology 72 (1): 86–101. doi:10.1086/224263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny, M., and L. Ennser-Jedenastik. 2014. “The Power of an Angry Base: Examining the Electoral Consequences of Forced Municipal Mergers.” Presented at the “Tag der Politikwissenschaft 2014”, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Kaniovski, S., and D. C. Mueller. 2006. “Community Size, Heterogeneity and Voter Turnouts.” Public Choice 129 (3–4): 399–415. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9063-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. E. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostadinova, T. 2003. “Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (6): 741–759. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraaykamp, G., M. van Dam, and T. Toonen. 2001. “Institutional Change and Political Participation: The Effects of Municipal Amalgamation on Local Electoral Turnout in the Netherlands.” Acta Politica 36 (4): 402–418.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A. 2002. “Size and Direct Democracy at the Local Level: The Case of Switzerland.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 813–828. doi:10.1068/c0226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Steiermark. 2012. “Stärkere Gemeinden - Größere Chancen: Gemeindestrukturreform Steiermark - Leitbild.” Accessed November 13, 2015. http://www.gemeindestrukturreform.steiermark.at/cms/dokumente/11615233_100167017/525d4b39/GSR_Leitfaden_30012012_Vs2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Land Steiermark. 2015a. “Allgemeine Gemeinderatswahlen. Gemeinderatswahlen 2015.” Accessed June 29 2016. http://www.verwaltung.steiermark.at/cms/ziel/74836454/DE/
   Google Scholar
• Land Steiermark. 2015b. “Gemeindestrukturreform. Ausgangslage und Prozess.” Accessed November 13, 2015. http://www.gemeindestrukturreform.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/11558627/69294537
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D. 2005. “The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 103–118. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00113.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (02): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüchinger, S., and A. Stutzer. 2002. “Economies of Scale in Municipal Administration. Empirical Analyses of Municipal Mergers.” Swiss Political Science Review 8 (1): 27–50. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00333.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marien, S., R. Dassonneville, and M. Hooghe. 2015. “How Second Order are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal Elections.” Local Government Studies 41 (6): 898–916. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1048230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, J. G., and F. Palda. 1999. “Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?” Public Choice 98 (3–4): 431–446. doi:10.1023/A:1018328621580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal vs. National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2149943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P. E. 1989. “City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 17 (6): 661–688. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00212.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council. 2007. “Finanzausgleichsgesetz 2008.” Accessed February 15 2018. https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Bundesnormen/NOR40168259/NOR40168259.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., and T. Plümper. 2017. Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi:10.2307/2586017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections - A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. 2012. “Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel.” Journal of Urban Economics 72 (2–3): 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesel, F. 2016. “Die politischen Kosten von Gebietsreformen.” ifo Dresden berichtet 23 (1): 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2016. “Local Representation and Strategic Voting: Evidence from Electoral Boundary Reforms.” European Journal of Political Economy 41: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, F., and R. C. Feiock. 1995. “Political Participation and City County Consolidation: Jacksonville-Duval County.” International Journal of Public Administration 18 (11): 1741–1752. doi:10.1080/01900699508525072.
   Google Scholar
• Settle, R. F., and B. A. Abrams. 1976. “The Determinants of Voter Participation: A More General Model.” Public Choice 27 (1): 81–89. doi:10.1007/BF01718949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, K. 2012. “Electoral Consequences of Municipal Mergers.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12 (3): 381–408. doi:10.1017/S1598240800008079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A., and J. W. A. Merer. 2002. “Parliamentary Election Turnout in Europe since 1990.” Political Studies 50 (5): 916–927. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangl, M., and S. Stoetzer. 2015. “Gemeindestrukturreformen in Österreich: Auswirkungen aus Sicht der Praxis.” Verwaltung und Management 21 (2): 89–95. doi:10.5771/0947-9856-2015-2-89.
   Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar