Effects of municipal mergers on voter turnout

References

• Alesina, A., and E. Spolaore. 1997. “On the Number and Size of Nations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1027–1056. doi:10.1162/003355300555411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J., J. Fiva, and G. Natvik. 2014. “Voting When the Stakes are High.” Journal of Public Economics 110: 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and A. Case. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review 85 (1): 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., and K. N. Hansen. 2011. “Who ‘Marries’ Whom? the Influence of Societal Connectedness, Economic and Political Homogeneity, and Population Size on Jurisdictional Consolidations.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (2): 212–238. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01928.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 790–803. doi:10.1111/ajps.2014.58.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110: 812–831. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, B., R. Freier, and A. Schumann. 2015. Finding Your Right (Or Left) Partner to Merge. DIW, Technical report, Discussion Papers 1467.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., G. Gurin, and W. E. Miller. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., and A. C. Acock. 1989. “National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 551–562. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. 1999. “Electoral Rules and the Calculus of Mobilization.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24: 387–420. doi:10.2307/440350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellavigna, S., J. A. List, U. Malmendier, and G. Rao. 2017. “Voting to Tell Others.” The Review of Economic Studies 84: 143–181. doi:10.1093/restud/rdw056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, A. 2015. “Proportionality and Turnout: Evidence from French Municipalities.” Comparative Political Studies 48: 135–167. doi:10.1177/0010414014534199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, T. 1998. “Externalities Vs Internalities: A Model of Political Integration.” Journal of Public Economics 68: 251–268. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00090-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, P. 2010. “Social Incentives and Voter Turnout: Evidence from the Swiss Mail Ballot System.” Journal of the European Economic Association 8: 1077–1103. doi:10.1111/jeea.2010.8.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, A., G. Rico, and E. Anduiza. 2012. “Disproportionality and Voter Turnout in New and Old Democracies.” Electoral Studies 31: 159–169. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., D. P. Green, and C. W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102: 33–48. doi:10.1017/S000305540808009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2013. “Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-Experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark.” Scandinavian Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2015. “The Democratic Costs of Size: How Increasing Size Affects Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government.” Political Studies 63: 373–389. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harjunen, O., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2017. Political Representation and Effects of Municipal Mergers. VATT Working Papers 98.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “Electoral Vulnerability And Size Of Local Governments: Evidence From Voting On Municipal Mergers.” Journal of Public Economics 120: 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., L. Keele, D. Tingley, and T. Yamamoto. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 765–789. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J., and S. Banducci. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 311–334. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. E. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23: 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytikäinen, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2016. Are Voters Rational? VATT Working Papers 50.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, T. J. 1993. “The Decision to Regionalize in the Provision of Education: An Application of the Tiebout Model.” Journal of Urban Economics 33: 344–360. doi:10.1006/juec.1993.1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi:10.2307/2586017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekola-Sjöblom, M. 2014. Kuntalaiset Ja Kunnat Muutoksessa. (In Finnish) Paras-ARTTU-tutkimuksia nro 31, Kuntaliitto: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, P. H. 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (3): 400–409. doi:10.1177/106591298303600306.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. G. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80: 17–43. doi:10.2307/1957082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W., and P. Ordenshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 25–42. doi:10.2307/1953324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesel, F. 2017. “Do Mergers of Large Local Governments Reduce Expenditures? – Evidence from Germany Using the Synthetic Control Method.” European Journal of Political Economy 50: 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “I Don’t Care to Belong to Any Club that Will Have Me as a Member: Empirical Analysis of Municipal Mergers.” Political Science Research and Methods 2: 97–117. doi:10.1017/psrm.2013.25.
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2016. “Local Representation and Strategic Voting: Evidence from Electoral Boundary Reforms.” European Journal of Political Economy 41: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2007. The Architecture of Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar