David and Goliath in the poll booth: group size, political power and voter turnout

References

• Abramson, P.R., A. Diskin, and D.S. Felsenthal. 2007. “Nonvoting and The Decisiveness Of Electoral Outcomes.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 500–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, J., B. Geys, and B. Heyndels. 2006. “Everyone Likes a Winner: An Empirical Test of the Effect of Electoral Closeness on Turnout in a Context of Expressive Voting.” Public Choice 128 (3/4): 383–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, J. F. 1965. “Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis.” Rutgers Law Review 19: 317–343.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, D. P., and J. A. Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1181–1206. doi:10.2307/1961664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, A., and M. Dahan. 2012. “Social Identity and Voting Behavior.” Public Choice 151 (1–2): 193–214. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9742-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, D. 1994. Fiscal federalism in Germany. In A. Mullins and C. Saunders (eds.), Economic Union in Federal Systems (pp. 152–193). Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 812–831. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, L.-E., T. Falch, and P. Tovmo. 2008. “Public Sector Efficiency: The Roles of Political and Budgetary Institutions, Fiscal Capacity, and Democratic Participation.” Public Choice 136 (3–4): 475–495. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9309-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., J. M. Manzi, and J. S. Shaw. 1993. “In-Group Identification as a Function of Depersonalization, Distinctiveness, and Status.” Psychological Science 4 (2): 88–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00466.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bufacchi, V. 2001. “Voting, Rationality and Reputation.” Political Studies 49 (4): 714–729. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42 (June): 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coate, S., and M. Conlin. 2004. “A Group Rule-Utilitarian Approach to Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 94 (5): 1476–1504. doi:10.1257/0002828043052231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, P.H., M. Koethenbuerger, and G. Loumeau. 2017. Local Border Reforms and Economic Activity. CESifo Working paper, nr. 6738.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., P. Kortekaas, and J. W. Ouwerkerk. 1999. “Self-Categorisation, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2–3): 371–389. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, E. J. 2006. “Stacking the States, Stacking the House: The Partisan Consequences of Congressional Redistricting in the 19th Century.” American Political Science Review 100 (3): 419–427. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 66 (4): 1234–1245. doi:10.2307/1957176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feddersen, T., and A. Sandroni. 2006. “A Theory of Participation in Elections.” American Economic Review 96 (4): 1271–1282. doi:10.1257/aer.96.4.1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. H. 2006. “Altruism and Turnout.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 674–683. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., D. P. Green, and C. W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102 (01): 33–48. doi:10.1017/S000305540808009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B. 2006a. “‘Rational’ Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review.” Political Studies Review 4 (1): 16–35. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00034.x.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, B. 2006b. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research.” Electoral Studies 25 (4): 637–663. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., F. Heinemann, and A. Kalb. 2008. “Local Governments in the Wake of Demographic Change: Evidence from German Municipalities.” Finanzarchiv 64 (4): 434–457. doi:10.1628/001522108X397642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., F. Heinemann, and A. Kalb. 2010. “Voter Involvement, Fiscal Autonomy and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from German Municipalities.” European Journal of Political Economy 26 (2): 265–278. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K. 2004. “Voter Turnout in Politically Homogeneous and Dichotomous Contexts.” Electoral Studies 23: 501–524. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00057-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Großer, J., and A. Schram. 2006. “Neighborhood Information Exchange and Voter Participation: An Experimental Study.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinich, M. J. 1981. “Voting as an Act of Contribution.” Public Choice 36: 135–140. doi:10.1007/BF00163775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnerich, B. 2009. “Do Merging Local Governments Free Ride on Their Counterparts When Facing Boundary Reform?” Journal of Public Economics 93 (5–6): 721–728. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “Electoral Vulnerability and Size of Local Governments: Evidence from Voting on Municipal Mergers.” Journal of Public Economics 120: 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruelle, A., and F. Valenciano. 2001. “Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf Indices Revisited.” Mathematics of Operations Research 26 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1287/moor.26.1.89.10589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen, C., P. Boenisch, and B. Geys. 2014. “(De)Centralization and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from German Municipalities.” Public Choice 159 (3): 469–483. doi:10.1007/s11127-013-0061-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., and J. M. Wooldridge. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (6): 619–632. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. 2012. “Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel.” Journal of Urban Economics 72 (2–3): 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H., and P. C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 25–42. doi:10.2307/1953324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royackers, T. 2015. “Fusie nog altijd niet verteerd: Man start petitie tégen invoering van één postcode voor heel de gemeente.” Het Nieuwsblad, 21/ 10/2015. Accessed 20 July 2016. http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20151020_01930408
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “I Don’t Care to Belong to Any Club that Will Have Me as a Member: Empirical Analysis of Municipal Mergers.” Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1): 97–117. doi:10.1017/psrm.2013.25.
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2015. “Common Pool Problems in Voluntary Municipal Mergers.” European Journal of Political Economy 38: 140–152. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2016. “Local Representation and Strategic Voting: Evidence from Electoral Boundary Reforms.” European Journal of Political Economy 41: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, A. 1991. Voter Behavior in Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, A., and F. Van Winden. 1991. “Why People Vote: Free Riding and the Production and Consumption of Social Pressure.” Journal of Economic Psychology 12: 575–620. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(91)90002-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, A., and J. Sonnemans. 1996. “Why People Vote: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Economic Psychology 17: 417–442. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(96)00022-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler, A. A. 2000. A Logic of Expressive Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. S., and M. Shubik. 1954. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in A Committee System.” American Political Science Review 48 (3): 787–792. doi:10.2307/1951053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotts, K. W. 2002. “Gerrymandering, Legislative Composition, and National Policy Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 398–414. doi:10.2307/3088384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, C. J. 1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 390–422. doi:10.2307/2111153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R., K. A. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 642–664. doi:10.1086/260997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille, F., and K. Deschouwer. 2012. Over Mensen En Macht: Coalitievorming in De Belgische Gemeenten. Brussel: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. 2004. “Local Government Reforms in Great Britain, Sweden, Germany and France: Between Multi-Function and Single-Purpose Organisations.” Local Government Studies 30 (4): 639–665. doi:10.1080/0300393042000318030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar