699
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis

, &

References

  • Abelson, P., and R. Joyeux. 2015. “New Development: Smoke and Mirrors – Fallacies in the New South Wales Government’s Views on Local Government Financial Capacity.” Public Money & Management 35 (4): 315–320. doi:10.1080/09540962.2015.1047278.
  • Andrews, R. 2015. “Vertical Consolidation and Financial Sustainability: Evidence from English Local Government.” Environment and Planning C 33: 1518–1545. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614179.
  • Aristotle. 2012. Aristotle: The Art of Rhetoric. London: Collins Classics.
  • Asad, G. 2003. “It is Actually Good for the Arabs.” Haaretz 21.5. (Hebrew)
  • Booth, W. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Boydstun, A., A. Ledgerwood, and J. Sparks. 2017. “A Negativity Bias in Reframing Shapes Political Preferences Even in Partisan Contexts.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 1–9. doi:10.1177/1948550617733520:.
  • Chambers, S. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 37 (3): 323–350. doi:10.1177/0090591709332336.
  • Chandler, J. 2007. Explaining Local Government: Local Government in Britain since 1800. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Commission on Public Service Governance and Delivery. 2014. Full Report. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
  • Davidson, S., and S. Elstub. 2014. “Deliberative and Participatory Democracy in the UK.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16: 367–385. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12001.
  • Dollery, B., and B. Grant. 2013. “Introduction to the Special Edition on Amalgamation.” Public Finance & Management 13 (2): 1–5.
  • Drew, J. 2018. “How Losers Can Turn into Winners in Disputatious Public Policy: A Heuristic for Prospective Herestheticians.” Australian Journal of Political Science: 1–16. In Print. doi:10.1080/10361146.2018.1520195.
  • Drew, J., B. Grant, and N. Campbell. 2016. “Progressive and Reactionary Rhetoric in the Municipal Reform Debate in New South Wales Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 323–337. doi:10.1080/10361146.2016.1154926.
  • Drew, J., M. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2015. “No Aladdin’s Cave in New South Wales? Local Government Amalgamation, Scale Economies and Data Envelopment Specification.” Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399715581045.
  • Ettinger, Y. 2003. “They Don’t Want to Amalgamate Us, They Want to Erase Us.” Haaretz 13.5. (Hebrew)
  • Finlayson, A., and J. Martin. 2008. “‘It Ain’t What You Say…’: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric.” British Politics 3: 445–464. doi:10.1057/bp.2008.21.
  • Glanville, B. 2016. “Woollahra Council Loses Legal Challenge Against NSW Government Over Forced Amalgamation.” Australian Broadcasting Commission 20 (July): 2016.
  • Golan, A. 2003. “We Don’t Want to Amalgamate.”Haaretz5.8. (Hebrew)
  • Goodin, R., and P. Wilenski. 1984. “The Logical Underpinnings of Administrative Principles.” Public Administration Review 44 (6): 512–517. doi:10.2307/3110413.
  • Grant, B., and J. Drew. 2017. Local Government in Australia: History, Theory and Public Policy. Singapore: Springer Palgrave.
  • Halabi, R. 2003. “The End of Clan Rule.” Haaretz 28.4. (Hebrew)
  • Hirschman, A. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
  • Hirschman, A. 1993. “The Rhetoric of Reaction – Two Years Later.” Government and Opposition 28 (3): 292–314. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1993.tb01317.x.
  • Macedo, S. ed. 1999. Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McCloskey, D. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Office of Local Government 2014. Fit for The Future - a Blueprint for The Future Of Local Government. Sydney: Office of Local Government.
  • Pollitt, C., and P. Hupe. 2011. “Talking about Government: The Role of Magic Concepts.” Public Management Review 13 (5): 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963.
  • Quirk, B. 2006. “Innovation in Local Democracy: The London Borough of Lewisham.” Local Government Studies 32 (3): 357–372. doi:10.1080/03003930600693237.
  • Razin, E. 1996. “Municipal Reform in The Tel Aviv Metropolis: Metropolitan Government or Metropolitan Cooperation.“ Environment and Planning C Government and Policy 14 (1): 39-54. doi: 10.1068/c140039.
  • Razin, E. 2004. “Needs and Impediments for Local Government Reform: Lessons from Israel.” Journal of Urban Affairs 26 (5): 623–640. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00218.x.
  • Razin, E., and A. Hazan. 2004. “Municipal Boundary Conflicts between Jewish and Arab Local Authorities in Israel: Geography of Administration or Geopolitics?” Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography 86 (2): 79–94. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00155.x.
  • Rechter, E. 2003. “The Public Interest Comes First.” Haaretz 14.5. (Hebrew)
  • Reingewertz, Y. 2012. “Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel.” Journal of Urban Economics 72 (2–3): 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001.
  • Riker, W. H. 1988. Liberalism Against Populism. Illinois: Waveland Press.
  • Riker, W. H. 1991. “Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, edited by J. Enelow and M. Hinich, 46–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Riker, W. H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric – Campaigning for the American Constitution. London: Yale University Press.
  • Sancton, A. 2005. “The Governance of Metropolitan Areas in Canada.” Public Administration and Development 25: 317–327. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X.
  • Saulwick, J. 2016. “There are Reasons to Merge Councils, but Not the Ones Mike Baird Is Using.” Sydney Morning Herald 17 (May): 2016.
  • Savitch, H., R. Vogel, and Y. Lin. 2010. “Beyond the Rhetoric – Lessons from Louisville’s Consolidation.” American Review of Public Administration 40 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/0275074009333175.
  • Simpson, J. 2011. Local, Regional, National: What Services are Best Delivered Where? Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
  • State Parliament of NSW (Hansard). 2014. Legislative assembly September 10 Accessed 8 October 2015. <https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20140910038>.Consulted.
  • State Parliament of NSW (Hansard). 2015. Legislative assembly 14 May 2015 Accessed 14 January 2017 http://www.lgnsw.org.au/files/imce-uploads/127/lg-amalgamations-parliamentary-debate-extract-14.5.15.pdf.Consulted.
  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
  • Welsh Government. 2004. Making The Connections: Delivering Better Services for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Government
  • Williams Commission. 2014. Report of the Commission on Public Service Governance and Delivery. Cardiff: Welsh Government.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.