Why voluntary municipal merger projects fail: evidence from popular votes in Switzerland

References

• Ai, C., and E. C. Norton. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economic Letters 80: 123–129. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M. A., and J. B. Geertsema. 2016. “The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending, Taxation, and Service Levels: Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation.” Journal of Regional Science 56 (4): 659–682. doi:10.1111/jors.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, D. A. 1999. “Politics Vs Economics: Evidence from Municipal Annexation.” Journal of Urban Economics 45: 501–532. doi:10.1006/juec.1998.2102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., and L. E. Rose. 2010b. “The Staying Power of the Norwegian Periphery.” In Territorial Choice: The Politics of Boundaries and Borders, edited by H. Baldersheim and L. E. Rose, 80–100. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., and L. E. Rose. 2010a. Territorial Choice: The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., and K. M. Hansen. 2011. “Who ‘Marries’ Whom? the Influence of Societal Connectedness, Economic and Political Homogeneity, and Population Size on Jurisdictional Consolidations.” European Journal of Political Research 50: 212–238. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01928.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikker, J., and D. Van der Linde. 2016. “Scale Economies in Local Public Administration.” Local Government Studies 42 (3): 441–463. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1146139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 812–831. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, A. 2004. “The Break-Up of Municipalities: Voting Behavior in Local Referenda.” Economics of Governance 5 (2): 119–135. doi:10.1007/s10101-003-0068-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, B., R. Freier, and A. Schumann. 2015. “Finding Your Right (Or Left) Partner to Merge.” DIW Berlin Discussion Paper 1467: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Calciolari, S., D. Cristofoli, and L. Macciò. 2013. “Explaining the Reactions of Swiss Municipalities to the ‘Amalgamation Wave’. At the Crossroad of Institutional, Economic and Political Pressures.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 563–583. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.698852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1974. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Municipalities Bern. 2017. “Fusion.” Accessed 28 January 2019. http://www.jgk.be.ch/jgk/de/index/gemeinden/gemeinden/gemeindereformen/fusion.html\#middlePar\_textbild
   Google Scholar
• Department of Municipalities Fribourg. 2017. “Gemeindefusionen.” Accessed 28 January 2019. https://www.fr.ch/de/datei/gemeindezusammenschluesse
   Google Scholar
• Department of Municipalities Vaud. 2017. “Fusions Des Communes.” Accessed 28 January 2019. https://www.vd.ch/themes/territoire/communes/fusions-de-communes/
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office. 2012. “Räumliche Typologien.” Accessed 28 January 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/querschnittsthemen/raeumliche-analysen/raeumliche-gliederungen/raeumliche-typologien.html
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office. 2017. “Portraits of the Cantons.” Accessed January 28 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/regional-statistics/regional-portraits-key-figures/cantons.html
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, N., M. Wikström, and E. Wångmar. 2012. “Municipal Preferences for State-Imposed Amalgamations: An Empirical Study Based on the Swedish Municipal Reform of 1952.” Urban Studies 49 (12): 2733–2750. doi:10.1177/0042098011429488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2013. “Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-Experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. J., and L. J. Sharpe. 1991. “Local Government in International Perspective: Some Comparative Observations.” In Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective. Analyses of Twenty Western Industrialised Countries, edited by J. J. Hesse, 603–621. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Hinnerich, B. T. 2009. “Do Merging Local Governments Free Ride on Their Counterparts When Facing Boundary Reform?” Journal of Public Economics 93: 721–728. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2016. Community, Scale, and Regional Governance. A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and C. J. Wilson. 2002. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions in European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “Electoral Vulnerability and Size of Local Governments: Evidence from Voting on Municipal Mergers.” Journal of Public Economics 120: 193–204. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., and U. Kjaer. 2016. “Political Representation and Geographical Bias in Amalgamated Local Governments.” Local Government Studies 42 (2): 208–227. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1127225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. 2014. “Functioning and Impact of Incentives for Amalgamations in a Federal State: The Swiss Case.” International Journal of Public Administration 37 (10): 625–637. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.903265.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. D., and M. Janowitz. 1974. “Community Attachment in Mass Society.” American Sociological Review 39: 328–339. doi:10.2307/2094293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M. 2011. “Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 207–230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marando, V. L., and C. R. Whitley. 1972. “City-County Consolidation. An Overview of Voter Response.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 8 (2): 181–203. doi:10.1177/107808747200800203.
   Google Scholar
• Marcal, L., and S. Svorny. 2000. “Support for Municipal Detachment. Evidence from a Recent Survey of Los Angeles Voters.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (1): 93–103. doi:10.1177/10780870022184778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, O. 2005. “Multi-Level Populism and Centre-Periphery Cleavage in Switzerland: The Case of the Lega Dei Ticinesi.” In Challenges to Consensual Politics: Democracy, Identity, and Populist Protest in the Alpine Region, edited by D. Caramani and Y. Mény, 209–227. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, T. 2014. “Municipal Consolidation and Local Government Behavior: Evidence from Japanese Voting Data on Merger Referenda.” Economics of Governance 15 (4): 387–410. doi:10.1007/s10101-014-0145-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. 2015. Metropolitan Governance in America. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquier, R. 2017. “Introduction. Une Révolution Territoriale Silencieuse? Les Communes Nouvelles Entre Européanisation et Gouvernance Territoriale.” Revue Française d’administration Publique 162 (2): 239–252. doi:10.3917/rfap.162.0239.
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2014. “I Don’t Care to Belong to Any Club that Will Have Me as a Member. Empirical Analysis of Municipal Mergers.” Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1): 97–117. doi:10.1017/psrm.2013.25.
   Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2015. “Common Pool Problems in Voluntary Municipal Mergers.” European Journal of Political Economy 38: 140–152. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2016. “Local Representation and Strategic Voting: Evidence from Electoral Boundary Reforms.” European Journal of Political Economy 41: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. 2003. “The Causes, Spread and Effects of Intermunicipal Cooperation and Municipal Mergers in Switzerland.” Public Management Review 5 (4): 551–571. doi:10.1080/1471903032000178581.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R., and C. Kaiser. 2017. “Effects of Amalgamations: Evidence from Swiss Municipalities.” Public Management Review 19 (2): 232–252. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1153704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strebel, M. A. 2018. “Incented Voluntary Municipal Mergers as a Two-Stage Process: Evidence from the Swiss Canton of Fribourg.” Urban Affairs Review 54 (2): 267–301. doi:10.1177/1078087416651935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weese, E. 2015. “Political Mergers as Coalition Formation: An Analysis of the Heisei Municipal Amalgamations.” Quantitative Economics 6: 257–307. doi:10.3982/QE442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar