Public administrators in interactive democracy: a multi-paradigmatic approach

References

• Alonso, S., J. Keane, and W. Merkel, Eds. 2011. The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research 8 (4): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2012. “Stewards, Mediators and Catalysts: Towards a Model of Collaborative Leadership.” The Innovation Journal 17 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, S., M. Sandford, and T. Coombes. 2017. “Policy-Making ‘Front’and ‘Back’stage: Assessing the Implications for Effectiveness and Democracy.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (4): 861–876. doi:10.1177/1369148117721842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., J. Edelenbo, and B. Steijn, Eds. 2011. Innovation in the Public Sector. New York: Grave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., and R. M. Walker. 2004. “Strategy Content and Public Service Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2): 231–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, D. W. 1991. “Constructing Adaptability: Proactive and Reactive Coping Changes in Response to an Environmental Jolt and Increased Organizational Strain.” Journal of Applied Sociology 8: 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N., W. Jennings, J. Moss, and G. Stoker. 2018. The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domahidy, M. R., and J. F. Gilsinan. 1992. “The Back Stage Is Not the Back Room: How Spatial Arrangements Affect the Administration of Public Affairs.” Public Administration Review 6: 588–593. doi:10.2307/977169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. 2005. “Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice.” Governance 18 (1): 111–134. doi:10.1111/gove.2005.18.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman. 2016. Edelman Trust Barometer, 2016, Edelman inc. Retrieved from: https://www.edelman.com/research/2016-edelman-trust-barometer.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A. 2014. “Same Problem, Different Solutions: The Case of ‘Honour Killing’ in Germany and Britain.” In Honour Killing and Violence: Theory, Policy and Practice, edited by A. K. Gill, C. Strange, and K. Roberts, 199–217. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, and A. Pettigrew. 1996. The New Public Management in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2006. Empowered Participation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and M. E. Warren. 2011. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Washington D.C: Bertelmann Foundations.
   Google Scholar
• Goerdel, H. T. 2005. “Taking Initiative: Proactive Management and Organizational Performance in Networked Environments.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 351–367. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C., L. H. Rykkja, and P. Lægreid, Eds. 2016. Nordic Administrative Reforms: Lessons for Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. 2014. Leading the Inclusive City: Place-basedInnovation for a Bounded Planet. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. 2015. “Coupling Citizens and Elites in Deliberative Systems: The Role of Institutional Design.” European Journal of Political Research 55: 43–60. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrting, N., and C. Kugelberg, Eds. 2018. Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy. Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M., and D. V. Summers. 1994. “Doing Well while Doing Good: Dillemmas of Performance Measurement in Notprofit Organizations and the Need for a Multiple-Constituency Approach.” In Public Sector Management: Theory, Critique and Practice, edited by  D. McKevitt, and  A. Lawton, 220–236. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Karsen, N., and F. Hendriks. 2017. “Don’t Call Me a Leader, but I Am One: The Dutch Mayor and the Tradition of Bridging and Bonding Leadership in Consensus Democracies.” Leadership 13 (2): 154–172. doi:10.1177/1742715016651711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausen, K. K., Ed. 1998. New Public Management I Norden: Nye Organisations-Og Ledelseformer I Den Decentrale Velfærdsstat. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., M. Kars, and H. V. D. Voort. 2009. “Vertical Politics in Horizontal Policy Networks: Framework Setting as Coupling Arrangement.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (4): 769–792. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00334.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Marshment, J. 2015. The Ministry of Public Input: Integrating Citizens Views into Political Leadership. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective: Sharpening the Focus and Widening the Scope.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 50 (2): 127–149. doi:10.1177/0021886314522322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. L. 1959. “The Science of Muddeling Through.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. 2 ed. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maasen, S., and P. Weingart. 2006. Democratization of Expertise?: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Eds. S. Maasen and P. Weingart. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., and M. Leighninger. 2015. Public Administrators for 21.St Century Democracy. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, M. A., K. M. Esterling, and D. M. J. Lazer. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K., and B. Geissel, Eds. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? Oxon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J., and J. March. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New york: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Ed. 2010. The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. New york: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. B., C. Thomas, and M. Kern. 2016. “Innovation and Agreement? Tensions among the Outputs of Collaborative Governance.” Paper Presented at the ASPA Conference, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• PEW Research Center, Public Trust in Government, 1958–2014. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. 1984. Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., and A. B. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z., and P. Walley. 2008. “Learning to Walk before We Try to Run: Adapting Lean for the Public Sector.” Journal Public Money & Management 28 (1): 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in case Study Research A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61 (2): 176–183. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeting, D., and R. Hambleton. 2017. “Mayoral Governance in Bristol: Has It Made a Difference?” In Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance: Impact and Practice, edited by D. Sweeing, 19–34. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B.G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing The Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou. 2013. “What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political Administrative System.” International Review of Public Administration 18 (2): 9–25. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805250.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou, Eds. 2016. Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2011. “Representative Democracy and Its Critics.” In The Future of Representative Democracy, edited by S. Alonosi, J. Keane, and W. Merkel, 23–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 2009. “Governance-Driven Democratization.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1080/19460170903158040.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1946. Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (2): 197–222. doi:10.2307/2139277.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. 2012. “Implementation Perspectives: Status and Reconsiderations.” In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, edited by G. Peters and J. Pierre, 255–264. London, New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar