549
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special issue on The logic of the local. Practices, austerity and British local government

Local government and practice ontologies: agency, resistance and sector speaks in homelessness services

References

  • Bailey, N., G. Bramley, and A. Hastings. 2015. “Symposium Introduction: Local Responses to ‘Austerity’.” Local Government Studies, 41 (4): 571–581. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03003930.2015.1036988
  • Baines, D. 2004. “Pro-market, non-market: The dual nature of organizational change in social services delivery.” Critical Social Policy 24 (1): 5–29.
  • Baker, T., and T. Davis. 2018. “Everyday Resistance to Workfare: Welfare Beneficiary Advocacy in Auckland, New Zealand.” Social Policy & Society 17 (4): 535–546. doi:10.1017/S1474746417000306.
  • Bartels, K. 2017. “The Double Bind of Social Innovation: Relational Dynamics of Change and Resistance in Neighbourhood Governance.” Urban Studies 54 (16): 3789–3805. doi:10.1177/0042098016682935.
  • Beveridge, R., and P. Koch. 2017. “The Post-political Trap? Reflections on Politics, Agency and the City.” Urban Studies 54 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1177/0042098016671477.
  • Brady, M. 2014. “Ethnographies of Neoliberal Governmentalities: from the neoliberal apparatus to neoliberalism and governmental assemblages.” Foucault Studies 18: 11–33.
  • Carmel, E., and J. Harlock. 2008. “Instituting the 'third sector' as a governable terrain: Partnership.” procurement and performance in the UK, Policy & Politics 36 (2): 155–171.
  • Clarke, J., D. Bainton, N. Lendvai, and P. Stubbs. 2015. Making Policy Move. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Clayton, J., C. Donovan, and J. Merchant. 2015. “Emotions of Austerity: Care and Commitment in Public Service Delivery in the North East of England.” Emotion, Space and Society 14: 24–32. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2014.11.004.
  • Davies, J., S. Bua, A. Cortina Oriol, and E. Thompson. 2020. “Why Is Austerity Governable? A Gramscian Urban Regime Analysis of Leicester, UK.” Journal of Urban Affairs. 42 (1), 56–74.
  • Dingwall, R. 1977. “Atrocity Stories and Professional Relationships.” Sociology of Work and Occupations 4: 317–396. doi:10.1177/003803857700400401.
  • Dobson, R. 2015. “Power, Agency, Relationality and Welfare Practice.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (4): 687–705. doi:10.1017/S0047279415000318.
  • Dobson, R. 2017. “Recollection-As-Method in Social Welfare Practice: Experience, Theory & Practice.” Qualitative Research Journal 17 (3): 164–176. doi:10.1108/QRJ-10-2016-0064.
  • Dobson, R. 2019. “Complex Needs in Homelessness Practice; a Review of ‘New Markets of Vulnerability’.” Housing Studies. doi:10.1080/02673037.2018.1556784
  • Dubois, V. 2009. “Towards a Critical Policy Ethnography: Lessons from Fieldwork on Welfare Control in France.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (2): 221–239. doi:10.1080/19460170903385684.
  • Durnova, A. 2013. “Governing Through Intimacy: Explaining Care Policies Through “Sharing A Meaning”.” Critical Social Policy 33 (3): 494–513. doi:10.1177/0261018312468305.
  • Fairclough, N. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177–197. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.798239.
  • Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. 2002. “Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29 (4): 981–1002. doi:10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981.
  • Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fortier, A. M. 2017. “The Psychic Life of Policy: Desire, Anxiety and ‘Citizenisation’ in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 37 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1177/0261018316655934.
  • Gaffney, S., and M. Millar. 2019. “Rational Skivers or Desperate Strivers? the Problematisation of Fraud in the Irish Social Protection System.” Critical Social Policy. 40 (1), 69–88
  • Gazso, A. 2020. “Dueling discourses, power, and the construction of the recovering addict : When social assistance confronts addiction in Toronto, Canada. ” Critical Social Policy 40 (1): 130–150.
  • Geddes, M., and H. Sullivan. 2011. “Localities, Leadership and Neoliberalization: Conflicting Discourses, Competing Practices.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 391–413. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.628003.
  • Hilbrandt, H. 2019. “Everyday urbanism and the everyday state: Negotiating habitat in allotment gardens in Berlin.” Urban Studies 56 (2): 352–367.
  • Hoggett, P. 2001. “Agency, Rationality and Social Policy.” Journal of Social Policy 30: 37–56. doi:10.1017/S0047279400006152.
  • Homeless Link. 2019. Rough sleeping - our analysis, https://www.homeless.org.uk/facts/homelessness-in-numbers/rough-sleeping/rough-sleeping-our-analysis [accessed November 4th 2019]
  • Howarth, D., J. Glynos, and S. Griggs. 2016. “Discourse, Explanation and Critique.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (1): 99–104. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618.
  • Hultin, L., and M. Mähring. 2017. “How Practice Makes Sense in Healthcare Operations: Studying Sensemaking as Performative, Material-discursive Practice.” Human Relations 70 (5): 566–593. doi:10.1177/0018726716661618.
  • Hunter, S. 2003. “A Critical Analysis of Approaches to the Concept of Social Identity in Social Policy.” Critical Social Policy 23 (3): 322–344. doi:10.1177/02610183030233002.
  • Hunter, S. 2008. “Living documents: A feminist psychosocial approach to the relational politics of policy documentation.” Critical Social Policy 28 (4): 506–528.
  • Hunter, S. 2015. Impossible Governance? London: Routledge.
  • Jessop, B. 2013. “The Returns of the Argumentative Turn.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (4): 434–439. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.851165.
  • Lancione, M. 2014. “Entanglements of Faith: Discourses.” Practices of Care and Homeless People in an Italian City of Saints, Urban Studies 51 (14): 3062–3078.
  • Larner, W. 2003. “Neoliberalism?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21: 509–512. doi:10.1068/d2105ed.
  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling The Social – an Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, J., and A. Mol. 2008. “Globalisation in Practice: On the Politics of Boiling Pigswill.” Geoforum 39 (1): 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.010.
  • Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2014. “ANT, Multiplicity and Policy.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (4): 379–396. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.957056.
  • Lea, T. 2008. Bureaucrats and Bleeding Hearts: Indigenous Health in Northern Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  • Lewis, G. 2000. Race, Gender, Social Welfare Encounters in a Postcolonial Society. Cambridge: Policy Press.
  • Li, T. 2014. “Fixing Non-market Subjects.” Governing Land and Population in the Global South 18: 34–48.
  • Lippert, R. K. 2014. Liberalism, Police, and the Governance of Little Urban Things, Foucault Studies 18: 49–6518
  • Local Government Association. 2018 Moving the conversation on: LGA Autumn Budget Submission to HM Treasury.
  • Lowndes, V., and K. McCaughie. 2013. “Weathering the Perfect Storm? Austerity and Institutional Resilience in Local Government.” Policy & Politics 41 (4): 533–549(17). doi:10.1332/030557312X655747.
  • Marston, G., and C. McDonald. 2012. “Getting beyond ’heroic Agency’ in Conceptualising Social Workers as Policy Actors in the Twenty First Century.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (6): 1022–1038. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs062.
  • Mcdermont, M. 2012. “Acts of Translation: UK Advice Agencies and the Creation of Matters-of-public-concern.” Critical Social Policy 33 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0261018312457859.
  • McGivern, G., and E. Ferlie. 2007. “Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal.” Human Relations 60 (9): 1361–1385.
  • Mckee, K. 2009. “Post-Foucauldian Governmentality: What Does It Offer Critical Social Policy Analysis?” Critical Social Policy 29 (3): 465–486. doi:10.1177/0261018309105180.
  • Meriluoto, T. 2019. “‘The Will to Not Be Empowered (According to Your Rules)’: Resistance in Finnish Participatory Social Policy.” Critical Social Policy 39: 87–107. doi:10.1177/0261018318764322.
  • Milbourne, L., and M. Cushman. 2015. “Complying, Transforming or Resisting in the New Austerity? Realigning Social Welfare and Independent Action among English Voluntary Organisations.” Journal of Social Policy 44: 463–485. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000853.
  • Mills, C. 2018. ‘Dead people don’t claim’: A psychopolitical autopsy of UK austerity suicides. Critical Social Policy 38 (2): 302–322.
  • Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Muñoz Arce, G. M., and C. Pantazis. 2019. “Social Exclusion, Neoliberalism and Resistance: The Role of Social Workers in Implementing Social Policies in Chile.” Critical Social Policy 39 (1): 127–146. doi:10.1177/0261018318766509.
  • Neal, S., and E. McLaughlin. 2009. “Researching Up? Interviews, Emotionality and Policy-Making Elites.” Journal of Social Policy 38 (4): 689–707. doi:10.1017/S0047279409990018.
  • Newman, J. 2014. “Landscapes of Antagonism: Local Governance, Neoliberalism and Austerity.” Urban Studies 51: 3290–3305. doi:10.1177/0042098013505159.
  • Peck, J. 2004. “Geography and Public Policy: Constructions of Neoliberalism.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (3): 392–405. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph492pr.
  • Prior, D., and M. Barnes. 2011. “Subverting Social Policy on the Front Line: Agencies of Resistance in the Delivery of Services.” Social Policy & Administration 45: 264–279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00768.x.
  • Probyn, E. 2005. Blush: faces of shame. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Puwar, N. 2004. Space Invaders: race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford. Berg.
  • Pykett, J. 2013. “Neurocapitalism and the new neuros: Using neuroeconomics, behavioural economics and picoeconomics for public policy.” Journal of Economic Geography. 13 (5): 845–869.
  • Rose, N. 2000. “Government and Control.” The British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 321–339. doi:10.1093/bjc/40.2.321.
  • Schmidt, V. A. 2011. “Speaking of Change: Why Discourse Is Key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 106–126. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576520.
  • Smets, M., and P. Jarzabkowski. 2013. “Reconstructing Institutional Complexity in Practice: A Relational Model of Institutional Work and Complexity.” Human Relations 66 (10): 1279–1309. doi:10.1177/0018726712471407.
  • Smith, A., and F. Elliott. 2012. “The Demands and Challenges of Being a Retail Store Manager: ‘Handcuffed to the Front Doors.’.” Work, Employment and Society 26 (4): 676–684. doi:10.1177/0950017012445091.
  • Twigg, J. 2012. “Adjusting the Cut: Fashion, the Body and Age on the UK High Street.” Ageing and Society 32 (6): 1030–1054. doi:10.1017/S0144686X11000754.
  • Wacquant, L. 2001. “The Penalization of Poverty and the Rise of Neoliberalism.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 9 (4): 401–412. doi:10.1023/A:1013147404519.
  • West, K. 2011. “Articulating Discursive and Materialist Conceptions of Practice in the Logics Approach to Critical Policy Analysis.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 414–433. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.628033.
  • Williams, F. 2000. Four Methodologies for Researching Moral Agency, Workshop Paper 16, Centre for Research into Care and Values, University of Leeds.
  • Wright, S., and C. Shore, (Eds.). 1997. Anthropology of Policy: Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge.
  • Wright, S. 2012. Welfare-to-work, agency and personal responsibility. Journal of Social Policy, 41(02), 309–328.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.