How institutional designs condition perceived local political leadership

References

• Alexander, E. 2005. “Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design.” Planning Theory 4 (3): 209‒223. doi:10.1177/1473095205058494.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H. 2005. “The Institutional Setting of Local Political Leadership and Community Involvement.” In Urban Governance and Democracy, edited by M. Haus, H. Heinelt, and M. Stewart, 75‒111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. 2001. “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Politics & Society 29 (1): 43‒72. doi:10.1177/0032329201029001003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M. 2007. Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, Public Services and the Challenge of Achieving Targets. London: Politico’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., ed. 2006. Parliament and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century: A Guide to Good Practice. Tielt: Lannoo.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, R., and N. Rao. 2005. Transforming Political Leadership in Local Government. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. 2004. Transforming Leadership: A New Pursuit of Happiness. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2006. Mayors and Schools: Minority Voices and Democratic Tensions in Urban Education. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., P. Christiansen, and M. Ibsen. 2011. Politik Og Forvaltning. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., and E. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., and C. Welzel, eds. 2014. The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman Inc. 2017. Edelman Trust Barometer 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Elcock, H. 2001. “A Surfeit of Strategies? Governing and Governance in the North-East of England.” Public Policy and Administration 16 (1): 59‒74. doi:10.1177/095207670101600104.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 2014. “The Institutional Approach to Political Leadership.” In Good Democratic Leadership, edited by J. Kane and H. Patapan, 139‒157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P. 2011. “Electoral Losers Revisited: How Citizens React to Defeat at the Ballot Box.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 102‒113. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219‒245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2003. “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3): 338‒367. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. Wright. 2003. Deepening Democracy. London: Verso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gissendanner, S. 2004. “Mayors, Governance Coalitions, and Strategic Capacity.” Urban Affairs Review 40 (1): 44‒77. doi:10.1177/1078087404267188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., and L. Rose. 2002. “Size and Democracy.” Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy 20 (6): 791–792. doi:10.1068/c2006ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 1998. The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, S., and G. Stoker. 2008. “Mayors and Urban Governance.” Public Administration Review 78 (4): 722‒730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C., L. Rykkja, and P. Lægreid. 2016. Nordic Administrative Reforms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., A. Bächtiger, and M. Setälä, eds. 2014. Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: The ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. 2002. “Distributed Leadership as a Unit of Analysis.” The Leadership Quarterly 13 (4): 423‒451. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haus, M., and D. Sweeting. 2006. “Local Democracy and Political Leadership: Drawing a Map.” Political Studies 54 (2): 267‒288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00605.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, L. 2012. “The Importance of Studying Political Leadership Comparatively.” In Comparative Political Leadership, edited by L. Helms, 1‒24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. 2016. “Coupling Citizens and Elites in Deliberative Systems: The Role of Institutional Design.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (1): 43‒60. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., and N. Karsten. 2014. “Theory of Democratic Leadership in Action.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and P. ’T Hart, 41‒56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertting, N., and C. Kugelberg. 2017. “Representative Democracy and the Problem of Institutionalizing Local Participatory Governance. In Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy, 1‒17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi-Accetti, C., and F. Wolkenstein. 2017. “The Crisis of Party Democracy, Cognitive Mobilization, and the Case for Making Parties More Deliberative.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 97‒109. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, K. 2007. “Event History Analysis of the Formation of Los Angeles Neighbourhood Councils.” Urban Affairs Review 43 (1): 107‒122. doi:10.1177/1078087407302123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J., H. Patapan, and P. ’T Hart. 2009. “Dispersed Democratic Leadership.” In Dispersed Democratic Leadership, edited by J. Kane, H. Patapan, and P. ’T Hart, 1‒12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, N., and F. Hendriks. 2017. “Don’t Call Me a Leader, but I Am One.” Leadership 13 (2): 154‒172. doi:10.1177/1742715016651711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellerman, B. 2015. Hard Times: Leadership in America. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kjær, U., and N. Opstrup. 2016. Variationer I Udvalgsstyret: Den Politiske Organisering I Syv Kommuner. Copenhagen: Kommuneforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., M. Kars, and H. van der Voort. 2011. “Politicians as Metagovernors.” In Interactive Policy Making, Metagovernance and Democracy, edited by J. Torfing and P. Triantafillou, 129‒148. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J., and P. Lawrence. 1974. Mayors in Action: Five Approaches to Urban Governance. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, and H. Baldersheim. 2016. “Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014).” Regional and Federal Studies 26 (3): 321‒357. doi:10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, S., and D. Wilson. 2002. “Rethinking Local Political Leadership.” Public Administration 80 (4): 665‒689. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Marshment, J. 2015. The Ministry of Public Input: Integrating Citizen Views into Political Leadership. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masciulli, J., M. Molchanov, and W. Knight. 2009. “Political Leadership in Context.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Political Leadership, edited by J. Masciulli, M. Molchanov, and W. Knight, 3‒30. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mikalsen, K., and H. Bjørnå. 2015. “Den Norske Ordføreren: Begrenset Myndighet, Mye Makt?” In Lokalpolitisk Lederskap I Norden, edited by N. Aarsæther and K. Mikalsen, 169‒195. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, K., and J. Hartley. 2006. “A Model of Political Leadership.” Human Relations 59 (4): 483‒504. doi:10.1177/0018726706065371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P., and J. Svara. 2002. Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators of Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, M., K. Esterling, and D. Lazer. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K., and B. Geissel, eds. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. 2008. The Powers to Lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2012. Institutional Theory in Political Science, the New Institutionalism. 3rd ed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre, eds. 2004. The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reuchamps, M., and J. Suiter, eds. 2016. Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, L., and K. Ståhlberg. 2005. “The Nordic Countries: Still the ‘Promised Land?’.” In Local Governance, edited by B. Denters and L. Rose., 83‒99. Basingstroke: Houndsmills, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sletnes, I. 2015. “Ordførerrollen I Norden I Et Rettslig Perspektiv.” In Lokalpolitisk Lederskap I Norden, edited by N. Aarsæther and K. Mikalsen, 28‒68. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2006. “Metagovernance: The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 98‒114. doi:10.1177/0275074005282584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2020. Interactive Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2016. Why Politics Matters. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., and C. Hay. 2017. “Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity Towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens.” Political Studies 65 (1): 4‒23. doi:10.1177/0032321715607511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svara, J. 1990. Official Leadership in the City, Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. 1994. “The Structural Reform Impulse in Local Government.” National Civic Review 83 (3): 323–347. doi:10.1002/ncr.4100830312.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61 (2): 176‒183. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. C. 1995. Politics as Leadership. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., and M. Carsten. 2016. “Followership in Context.” In The Routledge Companion to Leadership, edited by J. Storey, et al., 142–168. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vabo, S. 2000. “New Organisational Solutions in Norwegian Local Councils.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (4): 343‒372. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar