Encounters with the organisation: how local civil servants experience and handle tensions in public engagement

References

• Agger, A., and B. Damgaard. 2018. “Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street-level Bureaucrats.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 22 (3): 89–108. http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/sjpa/article/view/3890.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, N., and R. Vogel. 2018. “Value Conflicts in Co-production.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (7): 775–793. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-08-2017-0222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, N., and R. Vogel. 2019. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed.” Public Administration 97 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1111/padm.12589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, R. E., A. M. McDermott, and G. Currie. 2019. “Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (2): 318–333. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J., B. Denters, M. O. Vrielink, and P.-J. Klok. 2012. “Citizens’ Initiatives: How Local Governments Fill Their Facilitative Role.” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.698240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R., and J. Kitizinger, Eds. 1999. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. 2016. “Doing What’s Necessary.” In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance, edited by J. Edelenbos and I. Van Meerkerk, 352–375. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R. 2017. ''The double bind of social innovation.'' Urban Studies 54 (16): 3789–3805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., T. Nabatchi and R. O'Leary. 2005. ''The New Governance.'' Public Administration Review 65 (5): 547–558.
   Google Scholar
• Blijleven, W., M. van Hulst, and F. Hendriks. 2019. “Public Servants in Innovative Democratic Governance.” In Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, edited by S. Elstub and O. Escobar, 209–224. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CSB). 2017. ''Gebieden in Nederland 2017.'' Via: http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=83553NED&D1=0,45-47&D2=a&HDR=T&STB=G1&VW=T
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M. and I. Cook. 2007. Doing ethnographies. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Curry, N. 2012. “Community Participation in Spatial Planning.” Local Government Studies 38 (3): 345–366. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.642948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. 2016. “The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method.” Sociological Methods and Research 45 (2): 231–259. doi:10.1177/0049124115570065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and J. Forester. 2015. Conflict, Improvisation, Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., L. Huberts, and R. Smulders. 2016. “Coping with Public Value Conflicts.” Administration & Society 48 (9): 1101–1127. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and R. Denhardt. 2011. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H., Needham, C., Mangan, C. and H. Sullivan. 2019. Reimagining the Future Public Service Workforce. Singapore: Springer Singapore
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C. 2011. ''Revisiting Lipsky: Front‐line work in UK local governance.'' Political Studies 59 (4): 978–995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerd, A., and R. L. Heidelberg. 2019. “Administering Public Participation.” American Review of Public Administration: 1–15. doi:10.1177/0275074019871368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. 2005. “Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance.” An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18 (1): 111–134. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00268.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., I. van Meerkerk, and T. Schenk. 2018. ''The evolution of community self-organization in interaction with government institutions: Cross-case insights from three countries.'' American Review of Public Administration 48 (1): 52– 66.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O. 2015. “Scripting Deliberative Policy-Making.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (3): 269–285. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.946663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, I. and G. Allegretti. 2019. Local democratic innovations in Africa. In S. Elsub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovations (pp. 435–448). Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. 1993. “Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise.” Policy Sciences 26 (3): 165–187. doi:10.1007/BF00999715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2015. ''Putting the Public Back into Governance.'' Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtz, C., and T. van de Wijdeven. 2010. “Making Citizen Participation Work.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 531–549. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., and D. Knights. 2006. “Challenging Dualism: Public Professionalism in ‘Troubled’ Times.” Sociology 40: 277–295. doi:10.1177/0038038506062033.
   Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S., and M. Altamirano. 2017. “Government Facilitation of External Initiatives.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 35 (3): 465–490. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1374930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveri, A., I. Nyholm, A. Røiseland, and I. Vabo. 2009. “Governing Collaboration.” Local Government Studies 35 (5): 539–556. doi:10.1080/03003930903227360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjörne, E., I. Juliha, and C. van Nijnaten. 2010. “Negotiating Dilemmas in the Practices of Street-level Welfare Work.”.” International Journal of Social Welfare 2010 (19): 303–309. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. 2011. “Institutional Constraints and Practical Problems in Deliberative and Participatory Policy Making.” Policy and Politics 39 (2): 163–186. doi:10.1332/030557310X519650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., and M. Hill. 2007. “Street Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability.” Public Administration 85 (2): 279–299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianniello, M., S. Iacuzzi, P. Fedele, and L. Brusati. 2019. “Obstacles and Solutions on the Ladder of Citizen Participation: A Systematic Review.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 21–46. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, S., and T. Steen. 2019. “Realizing Public Values: Enhancement or Obstruction?” Public Management Review 21 (4): 606–627. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1508608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. S., K. M. Feltey, and B. O’Neill Susel. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 58 (4): 317–326. doi:10.2307/977561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruyen, P., and M. van Genugten. 2020. “Opening up the Black Box of Civil Servants’ Competencies.” Public Management Review 22 (1): 118–140. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1638442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., and M. Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counsellors. Stories from the Front-Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L. P., C. J. Uittenbroek, D. L. T. Hegger, and P. P. J. Driessen. 2019. “From Citizen Participation to Government Participation.” Environmental Policy and Governance 29 (3): 198–208. doi:10.1002/eet.1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. de Graaf. 2010. “Examining Citizen Participation.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. de Graaf. 2017. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policymaking and Democracy Revisited.” Local Government Studies 43 (6): 875–881. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikami, N. 2019. Trends in democratic innovation in Asia. In S. Elsub, S. & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovations (pp. 421–434). Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., and L. Blomgren Amsler. 2014. Direct public engagement in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 44 (4S): 63S–88S.
   Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., M. van der Steen, and M. van Twist. 2018. “Boundary-spanning Strategies for Aligning Institutional Logics: A Typology.” Local Government Studies 45 (2): 219–240. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1546172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., V. Bekkers, and W. Voorberg. 2016. “Self-Organization and the Role of Government.” Public Management Review 18 (7): 1063–1084. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1066417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2010. The New Public Governance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, L., Alver, J, Thompson, N. 2019. Democratic Innovation in Australasia. In S. Elsub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovations (pp. 435–448). Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2016. “Recovering the Craft of PA.” Public Administration Review 76 (4): 638–647. doi:10.1111/puar.12504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D. 2012. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State.” Administration & Society 45 (9): 1038–1062. doi:10.1177/0095399712451895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and T. Bentzen. 2020. “Public Administrators in Interactive Democracy: A Multi-paradigmatic Approach.” Local Government Studies 46 (1): 139–162. doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1627335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 2006. “value Conflict and Policy Change.” Review of Policy Research 23: 83–95. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00192.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thacher, D., and M. Rein. 2004. “Managing Value Conflict in Public Policy.” Governance 17 (4): 457–486. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00254.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. 2012. “Informed Grounded Theory.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56 (3): 243–259. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.581686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, G. B., Pierre, J. & Sørensen, E. 2012. Interactive Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4 (25): 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. 2015. “Learning to Co-produce? the Perspective of Public Service Professional.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (7): 583–598. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam, R., M. Duineveld, and R. Roel During. 2015. “Delineating Active Citizenship: The Subjectification of Citizens’ Initiatives.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 17 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.918502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bongaardt, T. 2018. Monitor Burgerparticipatie 2018. Den Haag: Prodemos.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Steen, M., M. van Twist, and D. Bressers. 2018. “The Sedimentation of Public Values.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 38 (4): 1–28. doi:10.1177/0734371X16671369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., and T. Steen. 2019. “Public Professionals’ Engagement in Coproduction.” American Review of Public Administration 49 (6): 733–748. doi:10.1177/0275074019840759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gestel, N., M. Kuiper, and W. Hendrikx. 2019. “Changed Roles and Strategies of Professionals in the (Co)production of Public Services.” Administrative Sciences 9 (3): 1–15. doi:10.3390/admsci9030059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. J., L. J. de Graaf, and G. J. M. van den Brink. 2012. “The Work of Exemplary Practitioners in Neighborhood Governance.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.730763.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2018. Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tol Smit, E., R. De Loë, and R. Plummer. 2015. “How Knowledge Is Used in Collaborative Environmental Governance.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (3): 423–444. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.860017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2019. “The Co-production of Public Value in Community Development.” International Review of Administrative Sciences: 1–17. doi:10.1177/0020852318804040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., Voets, J., and B. Verschuere. 2018. ''The co-production of a community.'' Voluntas 29 (1): 201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and M. van Bochove. 2018. ''Moving Away, Toward, and Against: How Front-line Workers Cope with Substitution by Volunteers in Dutch Care and Welfare Services.'' Journal of Social Policy 47 (4): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, N. 2019. Captured by bureaucracy. In M. Raco, M. & F. Savini (Eds.), Planning and knowledge: How new forms of technology are shaping contemporary cities (pp.75–89). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M. and L. J. Tummers. 2015. A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review 17(9): 1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2007. ''Governance, complexity, and democratic participation.'' The American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar