What shapes the flypaper effect? The role of the political environment in the budget process

References

• Acosta, P. 2010. “The Flypaper Effect in Presence of Spatial Interdependence: Evidence from Argentinean Municipalities.” The Annals of Regional Science 44 (3): 453–466. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0277-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon, F. M. 2013. “Local Spending, Transfers and Costly Tax Collection.” National Tax Journal 66 (2): 343–370. doi:10.17310/ntj.2013.2.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., and M. Kjaergaard. 2016. “Intergovernmental Grants and Public Expenditures: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Local Government Studies 42 (2): 189–207. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1110521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. J., and S. Connolly. 1998. “The Flypaper Effect: Identifying Areas for Further Research.” Public Choice 95: 335–361. doi:10.1023/A:1005053921709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastida, F., M. D. Guillamón, and B. Benito. 2013. “Municipal Spending in Spain: Spatial Approach.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 139: 79–93. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, L. 2005. “Strong Politicians, Small Deficits: Evidence from Norwegian Local Governments.” Public Choice 83 (3–4): 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Borge, L., T. Falch, and P. Tovmo. 2008. “Public Sector Efficiency: The Roles of Political and Budgetary Institutions, Fiscal Capacity, and Democratic Participation.” Public Choice 136 (3–4): 475–495. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9309-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, D. F., and W. E. Oates. 1971. “The Analysis of Revenue Sharing in a New Approach to Collective Fiscal Decisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 85 (3): 416–439. doi:10.2307/1885931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brollo, F., T. Nannicini, R. Perotti, and G. Tabellini. 2013. “The Political Resource Curse.” American Economic Review 103 (5): 1759–1796. doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. 2003. “Strategic Interactions among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies.” International Regional Science Review 26 (2): 175–188. doi:10.1177/0160017602250974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A., H. S. Rosen, and J. C. Hines. 1993. “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States.” Journal of Public Economics 52: 285–307. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernick, H. A. 1979. “An Economic Model of the Distribution of Project Grants.” In Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-aid, edited by P. Mieszowski and W. H. Oakland, 251–273. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P., E. Glaeser, T. Venables, M. Blake, and P. Manwaring. 2018. “Land and Property Taxes for Municipal Finance.” International Growth Centre Cities that Work Policy Paper 07/18.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, R. G., J. Martinez-Vazquez, M. McKee, and B. Torgler. 2009. “Tax Morale Affects Tax Compliance: Evidence from Surveys and Artefactual Field Experiment.” Field Experiments in Economics 70 (3): 447–457.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. 2014. Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P., and S. Fréret. 2009. “Evidence of Political Yardstick Competition in France Using a Two-Regime Spatial Durbin Model with Fixed Effects.” Journal of Regional Science 49: 931–951. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00613.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiva, J., and G. Natvik. 2013. “Do Re-election Probabilities Influence Public Investment?” Public Choice 157 (1): 305–331. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9946-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossen, F. M., L. Mergele, and N. Pardo. 2017. “Fueling Fiscal Interactions: Commodity Price Shocks and Local Government Spending in Colombia.” International Tax and Public Finance 24: 616–651. doi:10.1007/s10797-017-9461-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S., and A. Shah. (2007). “The Impact of Intergovernmental Transfers: A Synthesis of the Conceptual and Empirical Literature.” In Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice, edited by  R. Boadway and A. Shah. Washington: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S., and W. E. Oates. 1996. “Asymmetries in the Response to Increases and Decreases in Intergovernmental Grants: Some Empirical Findings.” National Tax Journal 49 (4): 501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, E., and G. Messina. 2014. “How Sticky are Local Expenditures in Italy? Assessing the Relevance of the Flypaper Effect through Municipal Data.” International Tax and Public Finance 21: 324–344. doi:10.1007/s10797-013-9269-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramlich, E. (1987). “Federalism and Federal Deficit Reduction.” National Tax Journal September: 299–313.
   Google Scholar
• Gramlich, E. M., and H. Galper. 1973. “State and Local Fiscal Behavior and Federal Grant Policy.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 15–58. doi:10.2307/2534084.
   Google Scholar
• Grassmueck, G., and M. Shields. 2010. “Does Government Fragmentation Enhance or Hinder Metropolitan Economic Growth?” Papers in Regional Science 89 (3): 641–657. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00278.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. 1986. “The Flypaper Effect and the Deadweight Loss from Taxation.” Journal of Urban Economics 19 (2): 148–155. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(86)90036-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyndels, B. 2001. “Asymmetries in the Flypaper Effect: Empirical Evidence for the Flemish Municipalities.” Applied Economics 33 (10): 1329–1334. doi:10.1080/00036840010004536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, J., and R. Thaler. 1995. “Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 217–226. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, R. P. 2008. “The Flypaper Effect.” NBER Working Paper No. 14579.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. 2014. “Do Local Government Fiscal Spillovers Exist? Evidence from Counties, Municipalities, and School Districts.” Journal of Public Economics 110: 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakamua, K., H. Yunoueb, and T. Kuramoto. 2014. “Spatial Patterns of Flypaper Effects for Local Expenditure by Policy Objective in Japan: A Bayesian Approach.” Economic Modelling 37: 500–506. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. 1984. Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multi-level Government. London: George, Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaergaard, M. 2015. “The Flypaper Effect: Do Political Institutions Affect Danish Local Governments’ Response to Intergovernmental Grants?” Local Government Studies 41 (4): 534–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, S. 2008. “Local Governments’ Asymmetric Reactions to Grants: Causes and Consequences.” Public Finance Review 36 (2): 219–242. doi:10.1177/1091142107299596.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. F., and J. Yu. 2010. “Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects.” Journal of Econometrics 154: 165–185. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P. 2014. “Spatial Econometric Panel Data Model Specification: A Bayesian Approach.” Spatial Statistics 9: 122–145. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., and R. K. Pace. 2009. An Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Levaggi, R., and R. Zanola. 2003. “Flypaper Effect and Sluggishness: Evidence from Regional Health Expenditures in Italy.” International Tax and Public Finance 10: 535–547. doi:10.1023/A:1026118222901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattos, E., F. Rocha, and P. Arvate. 2011. “Flypaper Effect Revisited: Evidence for Tax Collection Efficiency in Brazilian Municipalities.” Estudos Economicos, Sao Paulo 41 (2): 239–267. doi:10.1590/S0101-41612011000200002.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 1975. “An Econometric Model of Federal Grants and Local fiscal response.” Financing the New Federalism, 115-139.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120–1149. doi:10.1257/jel.37.3.1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1979). “Lump-sum Intergovernmental Grants Have Price Effects.” Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-aid 23:30.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, W., A. Custers, R. Dom, S. Davenport, and M. Roscitt. 2019. “Innovations in Tax Compliance. Conceptual Framework.” Policy Research Working Paper 9032, Washington: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rios, V., P. Pascual, and F. Cabasés. 2017. “What Drives Local Government Spending in Spain? A Dynamic Spatial Panel Approach.” Spatial Economic Analysis 12 (2–3): 230–250. doi:10.1080/17421772.2017.1282166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubini, N., and J. D. Sachs. 1989a. “Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies.” European Economic Review 33 (5): 903–938. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santolini, R. 2008. “A Spatial Cross-Sectional Analysis of Political Trend in the Italian Municipalities.” Papers in Regional Science 87: 431–451. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00201.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., and L. Lee. 2017. “Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects.” Journal of Econometrics 197 (2): 323–347. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A. 2006. “Expenditure Spillovers and Fiscal Interactions: Empirical Evidence from Local Governments in Spain.” Journal of Urban Economics 59 (1): 32–53. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine, W. F. 1994. “Is Local Government Revenue Response to Federal Aid Symmetrical? Evidence from Pennsylvania.” National Tax Journal 47 (4): 799–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovmo, P., and T. Falch. 2002. “The Flypaper Effect and Political Strength.” Economics of Governance 3 (2): 153–170. doi:10.1007/s101010100036.
   Google Scholar
• Vegh, C. A., and G. Vuletin. 2015. “Unsticking the Flypaper Effect in an Uncertain World.” Journal of Public Economics 131: 142–155. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegh, C. A., and G. Vuletin. (2016). Unsticking the Flypaper Effect using Distortionary Taxation (No. w22304). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Volkerink, B., and J. de Haan. 2001. “Fragmented Governments Effect on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence.” Public Choice 109: 221–242. doi:10.1023/A:1013048518308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., J. Wang, and X. Tian. 2016. “Identifying the Flypaper Effect in the Presence of Spatial Dependence: Evidence from Education in China’s Counties.” Growth and Change 47 (1): 93–110. doi:10.1111/grow.12113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar