“I’m paid to do other things”: Complementary co-production tasks for professionals

References

• Alford, J., and J. O’-Flynn. 2012. Rethinking Public Service Delivery: Managing with External Providers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2014. “The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 299–316. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J., B. Denters, M. O. Vrielink, and P.-J. Klok. 2012. “Citizens’ Initiatives: How Local Governments Fill Their Facilitative Role.” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.698240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2016. “What Has Co-Production Ever Done for Interactive Governance?” Edelenbos, J., van Meerkerk, I. In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance, 254–277. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and V. Pestoff. 2006. “Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2015. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, P., K. G. Lutz, W. Grant, and Z. Layton-Henry. 2008. Research Methods in Politics. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, G., A. Braunack-Mayer, and J. Barraket. 2009. “Spaces of Care in the Third Sector: Understanding the Effects of Professionalization.” Health 13 (6): 629–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., C. Needham, C. Mangan, and J. Rees. 2017. “Generating ‘Good Enough’ Evidence for Co-Production.” Evidence & Policy 13 (1): 135–151. doi:10.1332/174426415X14440619792955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., and H. G. Rainey. 2010. “Personnel Flexibility and Red Tape in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Distinctions Due to Institutional and Political Accountability.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 801–826. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoad, P. 2002. “Drawing the Line: The Boundaries of Volunteering in the Community Care of Older People.” Health & Social Care in the Community 10 (4): 239–246. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00361.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igalla, M., J. Edelenbos, and I. van Meerkerk. 2019. “Citizens in Action, What Do They Accomplish? A Systematic Literature Review of Citizen Initiatives, Their Main Characteristics, Outcomes, and Factors.” Voluntas 30 (5): 1176–1194. doi:10.1007/s11266-019-00129-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, C. 2018. “Co-Production and Community Development in France.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Service Delivery, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 208–210. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, Caitlin . 2021. “Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co‐production by third sector organizations under different models of public management.“ Public Administration 99 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1111/padm.12672 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, N. M., J. Brix, and H. K. Krogstrup. 2021. “Reshaping the Hybrid Role of Public Servants: Identifying the Opportunity Space for Co-Production and the Enabling Skills Required by Professional Co-Producers.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant, edited by H. Sullivan, H. Dickinson, and H. Henderson, 1–17, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. 2008. “Realising the Potential of Co-Production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services.” Social Policy and Society 7 (2): 221–231. doi:10.1017/S1474746407004174.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2007. “From ‘Pure’ to ‘Hybrid’ Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains.” Administration & Society 39 (6): 761–785. doi:10.1177/0095399707304434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., P. C. Baker, L. Kiser, R. Oakerson, E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom, S. L. Percy, M. B. Vandivort, G. P. Whitaker, and R. Wilson. 1981. “Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9 (7): 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., G. G. V. Ryzin, T. Bovaird, and E. Löffler. 2013. “Correlates of Co-Production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens.” International Public Management Journal 16 (1): 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2009. “Towards a Paradigm of Democratic Participation: Citizen Participation and Co-Production of Personal Social Services in Sweden.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80 (2): 197–224. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00384.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence.” Voluntas 23 (4): 1102–1118. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2014. “Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 383–401. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., and S. Tuurnas. 2018. “The Role of the Professional in Co-Production and Co-Creation Processes.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, 80–92. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Inquiry 30 (3): 167–186.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkens, E., and I. Verhoeven. 2019. “The Civic Support Paradox: Fighting Unequal Participation in Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Urban Studies 56 (8): 1595–1610. doi:10.1177/0042098018761536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L. G., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. 2015. “Learning to Co-Produce? The Perspective of Public Service Professionals.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (7): 583–598. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. 2021. “Skilling and Motivating Staff for Co-Production.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes, edited by E. Loeffler and T. Bovaird, 491–506, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Bochove, M., E. Tonkens, L. Verplanke, and S. Roggeveen. 2018. “Reconstructing the Professional Domain: Boundary Work of Professionals and Volunteers in the Context of Social Service Reform.” Current Sociology 66 (3): 392–411. doi:10.1177/0011392116677300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eijk, C., T. Steen, and R. Torenvlied. 2019. “Public Professionals’ Engagement in Coproduction: The Impact of the Work Environment on Elderly Care Managers’ Perceptions on Collaboration with Client Councils.” The American Review of Public Administration 49 (6): 733–748. doi:10.1177/0275074019840759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gestel, N., M. Kuiper, and W. Hendrikx. 2019. “Changed Roles and Strategies of Professionals in the (Co)production of Public Services.” Administrative Sciences 9 (3): 59. doi:10.3390/admsci9030059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Co-Production of a Community: Engaging Citizens in Derelict Neighbourhoods.” Voluntas 29 (1): 201–221. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9903-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2020. “The Co-Production of Public Value in Community Development: Can Street-Level Professionals Make a Difference?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86 (3): 582–598. doi:10.1177/0020852318804040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar