Facilitating citizen participation in marginalised neighbourhoods: selective empowerment in between vulnerability and active citizenship

References

• Agger, A., and A. Tortzen. 2022. “‘Co-Production on the inside’ – Public Professionals Negotiating Interaction Between Municipal Actors and Local Citizens.” Local Government Studies 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2081552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2007. “Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. T., and R. Van Kempen. 2003. “New Trends in Urban Policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark.” Cities 20 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00116-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 18 (4): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacqué, M., and C. Biewener. 2013. “L’empowerment, un nouveau vocabulaire pour parler de participation?” Idées économiques et sociales 3 (173): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.3917/idee.173.0025.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, J., B. Denters, M. O. Vrielink, and P.-J. Klok. 2012. “Citizens’ Initiatives: How Local Governments Fill Their Facilitative Role.” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.698240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, W., H. Van der Reijden, V. Veraart, and R. Post. 2019. Leefbaarheid in Tilburg Resultaten enquête Lemon meting 2019. Amsterdam: RIGO Research en Advies.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R. 2018. “Collaborative Dynamics in Street Level Work: Working in and with Communities to Improve Relationships and Reduce Deprivation.” Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space 36 (7): 1319–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418754387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blijleven, W., M. Van Hulst, and F. Hendriks. 2019. “Public Servants in Innovative Democratic Governance.” In Handbook of Democratic Innovations and Governance, edited by S. Elstub and O. Escobar, 209–224. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862.00024.
   Google Scholar
• Boeije, H., and I. Bleijenbergh. 2019. Analyseren in Kwalitatief Onderzoek: Denken en Doen. Den Haag: Boom/Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. 2021. “Vulnerable Citizens: Will Co-Production Make a Difference?” In The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes, 527–539. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_27.
   Google Scholar
• Bredewold, F., J. W. Duyvendak, T. Kampen, E. Tonkens, and L. Verplanke. 2018. De Verhuizing van de Verzorgingsstaat, Hoe de Overheid Nabij Komt. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, L., M. Van Hulst, and A. Michels. 2015. “Enhancing Participation in Disadvantaged Urban Neighbourhoods.” Local Government Studies 41 (1): 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.908771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., and R. Van Kempen. 2004. “Urban Governance within the Big Cities Policy.” Cities 21 (2): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikeç, M. 2007. Badlands of the Republic, Space, Politics, and Urban Policy. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712788.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., and V. Lowndes. 2010. “Neighbourhood Governance: Contested Rationales within a Multi-Level Setting – a Study of Manchester.” Local Government Studies 36 (3): 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003931003730477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., M. Van Hulst, S. Jeffares, O. Escobar, A. Agger, and L. De Graaf. 2016. “Five Ways to Make a Difference: Perceptions of Practitioners Working in Urban Neighborhoods.” Public Administration Review 76 (4): 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, O. 2021. “Between Radical Aspirations and Pragmatic Challenges: Institutionalizing Participatory Governance in Scotland.” Critical Policy Studies 16 (2): 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1993290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2004. Empowered Participation, Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. 2012. “From Innovation to Convention: Legitimate Citizen Participation in Local Governance.” Local Government Studies 38 (4): 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.698241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. 2021. “Democratic Innovations After the Post-Democratic Turn: Between Activation and Empowerment.” Critical Policy Studies 15 (2): 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2020.1733629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, L., and G. Mooney. 2013. ““Welfare ghettos” and the “Broken society”: Territorial Stigmatization in the Contemporary UK.” Housing, Theory & Society 30 (1): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.683294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrting, N., and C. Kugelberg, eds. 2017. Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy, Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315471174.
   Google Scholar
• Kampen, T., and E. Tonkens. 2019. “Empowerment and Disempowerment of Workfare Volunteers: A Diachronic Approach to Activation Policy in the Netherlands.” Social Policy & Society 18 (3): 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidelmeijer, K., J. Frissen, and J. van Iersel. 2020. Veerkracht in het corporatiebezit. De update: een jaar later, twee jaar verder. In-Fact-Research & Circusvis. https://www.hetccv-woonoverlast.nl/doc/Update-veerkracht-in-het-corporatiebezit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J. R. 2017. “The Paradox of Community Power: Cultural Processes and Elite Authority in Participatory Governance.” Social Forces 95 (3): 1155–1179. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M. 2013. “Citizen Participation in Urban Governance in the Context of Democratization: Evidence from Low-Income Neighbourhoods in Mexico.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 37 (1): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01175.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., L. Pratchett, and G. Stoker. 2006. “Diagnosing and Remedying the Failings of Official Participation Schemes.” Social Policy & Society 5 (2): 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746405002988.
   Google Scholar
• Lupien, P. 2018. “Participatory Democracy and Ethnic Minorities: Opening Inclusive New Spaces or Reproducing Inequalities?” Democratization 25 (7): 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1461841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, G. E., and D. Cushman. 1982. “Ethnographies as Texts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 11 (1): 25–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.11.100182.000325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, C. 2022. ““I’m Paid to Do Other things”: Complementary Co-Production Tasks for Professionals.” Local Government Studies 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2077728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A. 2012. “Citizen Participation in Local Policy Making: Design and Democracy.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (4): 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.661301.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2017. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policymaking and Democracy Revisited.” Local Government Studies 43 (6): 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Municipality of Tilburg. 2021. Wijken - Gemeente Tilburg. (z.d.). Gemeente Tilburg. Website https://www.tilburg.nl/stad-bestuur/stad/wijken/ (Last accessed April 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., and W. Ostendorf. 2023. “Urban Renewal Policies in the Netherlands in an Era of Changing Welfare Regimes.” Urban Research & Practice 16 (1): 92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer, J., and F. Moulaert. 2004. “Integrated Area Development and Social Innovation in European Cities.” City 8 (2): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481042000242201.
   Google Scholar
• PBL. 2016. De Verdeelde Triomf. Verkenning van stedelijk-economische ongelijkheid en opties voor beleid. Ruimtelijke Verkenningen 2016. Den Haag: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. 2000. Debating Governance, Authority, Steering and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. N. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 18 (2): 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 2005. “Narrative Analysis.“ Narrative, Memory & Everyday Life, edited byNancy Kelly, Christine Horrocks, Kate Milnes, Brian Roberts, David Robinson, 1–7. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E., and E. Schatz, ed. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226736785.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory & Society 23 (5): 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapper, M., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2020. “Good Residents, Bad Residents: How Participatory Processes in Urban Redevelopment Privilege Entrepreneurial Citizens.” Cities 107 (August): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvilzadeh, N. 2015. “Understanding Participatory Governance Arrangements in Urban Politics: Idealist and Cynical Perspectives on the Politics of Citizen Dialogues in Göteborg, Sweden.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (2): 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1050210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkens, E., and I. Verhoeven. 2019. “The Civic Support Paradox: Fighting Unequal Participation in Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Urban Studies 56 (8): 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018761536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2014. “Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 38 (4): 1418–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyterlinde, M., H. Boutellier, and F. De Meere. 2021. Perspectief Bieden: Bouwstenen voor de Gebiedsgerichte Aanpak van Leefbaarheid en Veiligheid in Kwetsbare Gebieden. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Velden, J., and E. Can. 2022. 75 Jaar Stedelijke Vernieuwing en Wijkaanpak: Kennisdossier Stedelijke Vernieuwing. The Hague: Platform 31. https://www.platform31.nl/artikelen/75-jaar-stedelijke-vernieuwing-en-wijkaanpak/
   Google Scholar
• Van de Wetering, S. A. L., and F. Kaulingfreks. 2020. “Youths Growing Up in the French Banlieues: Partners That Make the City.” In Partnerships for Livable Cities, edited by C. Montfort and A. Michels, 251–270. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40060-6_13.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Wijdeven, T., and F. Hendriks. 2009. “A Little Less Conversation, a Little More Action: Real-Life Expressions of Vital Citizenship in City Neighborhoods.” In City in Sight, Dutch Dealings with Urban Change, edited by J. W. Duyvendak, F. Hendriks, and M. van Niekerk, 121–140. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, R., and G. Bolt. 2009. “Social Cohesion, Social Mix, and Urban Policies in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24 (4): 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Co-Production of a Community: Engaging Citizens in Derelict Neighbourhoods.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations 29 (1): 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9903-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2020. “The Co-Production of Public Value in Community Development: Can Street-Level Professionals Make a Difference?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86 (3): 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318804040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and E. Tonkens. 2013. “Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands.” Social Policy & Society 12 (3): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000158.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and E. Tonkens. 2018. “Joining the Citizens: Forging New Collaborations Between Government and Citizens in Deprived Neighborhoods.” In From Austerity to Abundance? Creative Approaches to Coordinating the Common Good, edited by M. Stout. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2045-794420180000006008.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and E. Tonkens. 2022. “Enabling Civic Initiatives: Frontline Workers as Democratic Professionals in Amsterdam.” Local Government Studies 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2110077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2007. “Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality.” Thesis Eleven 91 (1): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513607082003.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. 1999. Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar