139
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Why and how often do authorities remunicipalise urban public transport? The case of France

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 763-785 | Received 03 Aug 2023, Accepted 21 Feb 2024, Published online: 11 Mar 2024

References

  • AGIR. 2017. “Guide. 50 Questions/Réponses sur la Société Publique Locale.” https://www.agir-transport.org/bibliotheque-medias/.
  • AGIR. 2018. “SPL Transports/Mobilité. Retours d’expériences d’élus En Charge Des Transports et de La Mobilité.” https://www.agir-transport.org/bibliotheque-medias/.
  • Albalate, D., G. Bel, R. Gradus, and E. Reeves. 2021. “La remunicipalisation des services publics locaux : ampleur, causes et perspectives.” Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives 87 (3): 437–443. https://doi.org/10.3917/risa.873.0437.
  • Albalate, D., G. Bel, and E. Reeves. 2021. “Government Choice Between Contract Termination and Contract Expiration in Re-Municipalization: A Case of Historical Recurrence?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 87 (3): 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211002608.
  • Allain. 1999. Les Grands Groupes Français de Transport de Voyageurs : Histoire, Stratégie, Diversification. CERTU. Collection Dossiers 100.
  • Amaral, M., S. Saussier, and A. Yvrande-Billon. 2009. “Auction Procedures and Competition in Public Services: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France and London.” Utilities Policy 17 (2): 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.006.
  • Baumstark, L., W. Roy, C. Ménard, and A. Yvrande-Billon. 2005. Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes 03MT24. Paris: PREDIT.
  • Becker, S., R. Beveridge, and M. Naumann. 2015. “Remunicipalization in German Cities: Contesting Neo-Liberalism and Reimagining Urban Governance?” Space and Polity 19 (1): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2014.991119.
  • Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services? A Survey of Empirical Studies.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417528.
  • Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2017. “What Have We Learned from the Last Three Decades of Empirical Studies on Factors Driving Local Privatisation?” Local Government Studies 43 (4): 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1303486.
  • Bönker, F., L. Jens, and W. Hellmut. 2016. “Remunicipalisation Revisited: Long-Term Trends in the Provision of Local Public Services in Germany.” In Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision, edited by H. Wollmann, I. Koprić, and G. Marcou, 71–85. London Palgrave Macmillan UK: Governance and Public Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57499-2_6.
  • Bouf, D., and B. Faivre d’Arcier. 2015. “The Looming Crisis in French Public Transit.” Transport Policy 42 (August): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.004.
  • CEREMA. 2020. ‘Les sociétés publiques locales dans le champ de la mobilité : Premiers retours d’expériences’. http://www.cerema.fr/fr/actualites/societes-publiques-locales-champ-mobilite-premiers-retours.
  • CEREMA. 2021. ‘Base Des Ressorts Territoriaux et Des AOM Au 1er Janvier 2021 (MáJ Au 25/06/2021). https://www.cerema.fr/fr/actualites/liste-composition-autorites-organisatrices-mobilite-au-1er-3.
  • CEREMA, CGDD, DGITM, GART, and FNTV. 2016. Enquête nationale sur les transports collectifs urbains. 1995-2016. https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/enquete-nationale-sur-les-transports-collectifs-urbains.
  • CGDD. 2018. Transport collectif urbain : malgré la croissance des coûts d’exploitation, la participation financière des usagers diminue. Paris: Commissariat général au développement durable.
  • Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and K. Arne Røvik. 2007. Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth. 1st ed. Routledge.
  • Clifton, J., M. E. Warner, R. Gradus, and G. Bel. 2021. “Re-Municipalization of Public Services: Trend or Hype?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1691344.
  • Cumbers, A., and S. Becker. 2018. “Making Sense of Remunicipalisation: Theoretical Reflections on and Political Possibilities from Germany’s Rekommumalisierung Process.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy & Society 11 (3): 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy025.
  • Domenach, O. 2015. “Secteur Public et Secteur Privé - Gestion Directe et Gestion Déléguée Dans Les Réseaux de Transport Public : Les Déterminants Du Choix.” In Rapport de recherche réalisée avec le soutien du GART, de l’UTP, la Fédération des EPL, la FNTV, 264. Aix-en-Provence: Jonction. https://www.gart.org/actualite/gestion-directe-gestion-deleguee-reseaux-de-transports-publics-determinants-choix/.
  • EPL and AdCF. 2014. “SPL et Dynamiques Territoriales. L’implication Des Communautés Dans Les Premières SPL Fédération des EPL et et l’Assemblée des communautés de France (AdCF).”
  • Gradus, R., and T. Budding. 2020. “Political and Institutional Explanations for Increasing Re-Municipalization.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (2): 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418787907.
  • Guelton, S., and P. Poinsot. 2020. “‘Mobilités urbaines : quels modèles de financement ?’.” L’Economie politique N° 85 (1): 36. https://doi.org/10.3917/leco.085.0036.
  • Hall, D., E. Lobina, and P. Terhorst. 2013. “Re-Municipalisation in the Early Twenty-First Century: Water in France and Energy in Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics 27 (2): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.754844.
  • Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh012.
  • Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2007. “Beyond the Market versus Planning Dichotomy: Understanding Privatisation and Its Reverse in US Cities.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417585.
  • IGD. 2019. Atlas de La Gestion Des Services Publics Locaux. Paris: IGD - Institut de la Gestion Déléguée. https://atlas.fondation-igd.org/edito.
  • Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  • Kalflèche, G. 2016. “Les modalités d’exploitation des services publics de transports urbains.” Droit et Ville 82 (2): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.3917/dv.082.0085.
  • Kalt, J. P., and M. A. Zupan. 1984. “Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics.” The American Economic Review 74 (3): 279–300.
  • Kim, Y., and M. E. Warner. 2021. “Pragmatic Municipalism or Austerity Urbanism? Understanding Local Government Responses to Fiscal Stress.” Local Government Studies 47 (2): 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1729751.
  • Kishimoto, S., O. Petitjean, and L. Steinfort. 2017. Reclaiming Public Services: How Cities and Citizens are Turning Back Privatisation. Transnational Institute Amsterdam. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/reclaiming-public-services.
  • Laffitte, O. 2015. ”SPL, SEMOP et Transports Collectifs : La « troisième Voie » ?” Contrats Publics, 44–47. Vol. 154. Le Moniteur. https://www.moniteurjuris.fr/contratspublics/.
  • Leiren, M. D. 2014. “Reintegration Failure and Outsourcing Upside: Organisation of Public Transport in Norway.” Local Government Studies 41 (2): 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.901216.
  • Leloup, F., L. Moyart, and B. Pecqueur. 2005. “La gouvernance territoriale comme nouveau mode de coordination territoriale ?” Géographie, économie, société 7 (4): 321–332. https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.7.321-331.
  • Le Ruyet, A. 2017. ”La Société Publique Locale, Un Nouveau Mode de Gestion Des Transports Publics Pour Allier Maîtrise et Simplicité et Une Nouvelle Structure Possible Pour La Gouvernance Des Transports.” Presented at European Regional Science Association (ERSA), July 5-7, Athens, Panteion University. Association de Science Régionale de Langue Française.
  • Le Squeren, Z. 2016. Politics and Public Administration: The Influence of Electoral Motives and Ideology on the Management of Local Public Services. PhD Thesis., Paris 1.
  • Levin, J., and S. Tadelis. 2010. “Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from US Cities.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 58 (3): 507–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x.
  • McDonald, D. A. 2018. “Remunicipalization: The Future of Water Services?” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 91 (May): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.027.
  • Mees, P., P. Moriarty, J. Stone, and M. Buxton. 2006. “Putting the Public Interest Back into Public Transport – a Report to the Victorian Community.” GAMUT2006/APR/01. Melbourne: GAMUT Australasian Centre for the Governance and Management of Urban Transport, The University of Melbourne.
  • Moldenæs, T., and H. Torsteinsen. 2017. “Re-Politicisation as Post-NPM Response? Municipal Companies in a Norwegian Context.” Local Government Studies 43 (4): 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1305954.
  • Pauliat, H. 2012. “L’évolution Des Modes de Gestion Des Services Publics Locaux: Un Retour à La Gestion Publique ?.” La Semaine Juridique - Administrations et Collectivités Territoriales 44–45 (2355): 45–48.
  • Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
  • Sia partners. 2014. Vers Un Retour En Force de La Gestion Directe Des Transports Publics Locaux ? La Lettre Sia Insight. https://www.sia-partners.com/en.
  • Stein, R. M. 1990. Urban Alternatives: Public and Private Markets in the Provision of Local Services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Sundell, A., and V. Lapuente. 2012. “Adam Smith or Machiavelli? Political Incentives for Contracting Out Local Public Services.” Public Choice 153 (3): 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9803-1.
  • Tadelis, S. 2002. “Complexity, Flexibility, and the Make-Or-Buy Decision.” American Economic Review 92 (2): 433–437. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191750.
  • Turri, V. M. 2022. Understanding European Drinking Water Services Remunicipalisation: A State of Literature Analysis.” Cities 120 (January): 103437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103437.
  • UTP. 2021. La concurrence dans les transports urbains en 2020 et sur 15 ans. Paris: Union des Transpors Publics et Ferroviaires.
  • Van de Velde, D., K. Thoresson, A. Wretstrand, and A. Paulsson. 2019. “Public Public Transport: Why Some Cities Choose to Move Away from Competitive Tendering of Public Transport.” Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo 16); 25-30 August 2019, Singapore.
  • Wang, H., R. Mu, and W. Liu. 2018. “Privatisation Reversals of Bus Transport Service: A Case of Shanghai in China.” Urban Policy and Research 36 (1): 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2016.1221812.
  • Warner, M. E. 2008. “Reversing Privatization, Rebalancing Government Reform: Markets, Deliberation and Planning.” Policy and Society 27 (2): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.09.001.
  • Warner, M. E. 2023. “Pragmatic Municipalism: Privatization and Remunicipalisation in the US.” Local Government Studies 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2162884.
  • Wassenaar, M., T. Groot, and R. Gradus. 2013. “Municipalities’ Contracting Out Decisions: An Empirical Study on Motives.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.778830.
  • Weber, G., I. Cabras, and L.-G. Frahm. 2019. “De-Privatisation and Remunicipalisation of Urban Services Through the Pendulum Swing: Evidence from Germany.” Journal of Cleaner Production 236 (November): 117555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.030.
  • Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williamson, O. E. 1999. “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspectives.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 306–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306.
  • Yvrande-Billon, A. 2006. “The Attribution Process of Delegation Contracts in the French Urban Public Transport Sector: Why Competitive Tendering is a Myth.” Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics 77 (4): 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2006.00315.x.
  • Yvrande-Billon, A. 2009. “Appels d’offres Concurrentiels et Avantage Au Sortant, Une Étude Empirique Du Secteur Du Transport Public Urbain En France.” Revue D’Économie Industrielle 127 (September): 113–130. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.4058.

Laws

  • Law no. 93-122 of 29 January 1993 on the prevention of corruption and the transparency of economic life and public procedures (Sapin Law).
  • Law no. 2000-1208 of 13 December 2000 on urban solidarity and renewal (SRU Law).
  • Law no. 2010-559 of 28 May 2010 for the development of local public companies (SPL Law).
  • Law no. 2015-991 of 7 August 2015 on the new territorial organisation of the Republic (NOTRe Law).
  • Law no. 2019-1428 of 24 December 2019 on the orientation of mobility (LOM).
  • Regulation (EC) 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road (PSO Regulation).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.