Is Reading Recovery sustainable two to four years after discontinuation?

References

• Allington, R. 2005. “How Much Evidence is Enough Evidence?” Journal of Reading Recovery 20th Anniversary Issue, 4 (2): 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, B. 2002. “Making a Case for Prevention in Education.” Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing 6 (2): 43–73.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. 1985. The Early Detection of Reading Difficulties. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. 2005. Literacy Lessons Designed for Individuals, Part One. Heinemann: Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., and J. A. Murphy. 2004. “A Meta-Analysis of Reading Recovery in United States Schools.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.3102/01623737026001023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darr, C., S. McDowall, H. Ferral, J. Twist, and V. Watson. 2008. Teacher Manual: Progressive Achievement Test: Reading. Wellington: New Zealand Council of Educational Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Every Child a Chance Trust. 2009. The Long Term Costs of Literacy Difficulties. 2nd ed. London: Every Child a Chance Trust. Report was prepared by J. Gross and members of the KPMG foundation. Accessed May 28, 2012. http://www.everychildachancetrust.org
   Google Scholar
• Gapp, S. G., G. Zalud, and D. Pietrak. 2009. “End of Intervention Reading Recovery Decisions and Subsequent Achievement.” Reading Improvement 46 (1): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. A. 2010. “Reading Recovery Teacher Expertise: Gaining and Structuring Content Knowledge for Early Literacy Intervention.” Literacy Teaching and Learning 5 (1): 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. 2012a. Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: The Data for 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. 2012b. Resource Teachers of Literacy: Annual Report 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Limbrick, L., and R. Jesson. 2010. “Are Gains from Early Literacy Interventions Sustained Over Subsequent Years of Primary Schooling: The Case of Reading Recovery in New Zealand.” Paper presented at British Educational Research Association (BERA) annual conference 2010, Coventry, UK, September 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall, S. 2006. “Effective Use of Reading Recovery in Low-Decile Schools.” SET: Research Information for Teacher, 1: 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall, S., S. Boyd, and E. Hodgen. 2005. Reading Recovery in New Zealand: Uptake, Implementation, and Outcomes, Especially in Relation to Maori and Pasifika Students. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. 2008. “Looking at School Improvement Through a Reading Recovery Lens.” Literacy Teaching and Learning 2 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., and B. Wade. 1998. “Reading and Comprehension: A Longitudinal Study of Ex-Reading Recovery Students.” Educational Studies 24 (2): 195–203. doi: 10.1080/0305569980240205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otaiba, A., and D. Fuchs. 2006. “Who are the Young Children for Whom Best Practices in Reading are Ineffective: An Experimental and Longitudinal Study.” Journal of learning Disabilities 39 (5): 414–431. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., and K. Wheldall. 2007. “Reading Recovery 20 Years Down the Track: Looking Forward, Looking Back.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 54 (2): 199–223. doi: 10.1080/10349120701330503
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., K. Wheldall, and A. Madelaine. 2009. “The Devil is in the Detail Regarding the Efficacy of Reading Recovery: A Rejoinder to Schwartz, Hobsbaum, Briggs and Scull.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 56 (1): 17–35. doi: 10.1080/10349120802681580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. 2004. “Lessons Learned from Research on Interventions for Students Who Have Difficulty Learning to Read.” In The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research, edited by P. McCardle and V. Chhabra, 355–382. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, B., and M. Moore. 1998. “Attitudes to Reading: A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of Reading Recovery.” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 33 (1): 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. 2007. “Beginning Reading Intervention Report: Reading Recovery.” Accessed May 1, 2012. http://www.readingrecovery.org/research/what_works/index.asp
   Google Scholar