Publication Cover
Education 3-13
International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education
Volume 45, 2017 - Issue 4
442
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring marine biodiversity through inquiry with primary school students: a successful journey?

, , &
Pages 437-449 | Received 26 Jun 2015, Accepted 07 Oct 2015, Published online: 05 Nov 2015

References

  • Anderson, R. D. 2007. “Inquiry as an Organizing Theme for Science Curricula.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 807–830. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Atkin, J. M., and P. Black. 2003. Inside Science Education Reform: A History of Curricular and Policy Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Barell, J. 2007. Problem-Based Learning: An Inquiry Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Bell, D. 2001. “Primary Science: Challenges for the Future." In Celebrating a Century of Primary Science, edited by M. d. Boo and A. Randall, 126–130. Herts: Association for Science Education.
  • Bell, P., B. Lewenstein, A. Shouse, and M. Feder, eds. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Persuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Boaventura, D., C. Faria, I. Chagas, and C. Galvão. 2013. “Promoting Science Outdoor Activities for Elementary School Children: Contributions from a Research Laboratory.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (5): 796–814. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.583292
  • Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2004. Learning Science Outside the Classroom. London: Routlege Falmer.
  • Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2006. “Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The Contribution of Out-of-School Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1373–1388. doi: 10.1080/09500690500498419
  • Brown, A. 1997. “Transforming Schools into Communities of Thinking and Learning about Serious Matters.” American Psychologist 52: 399–413. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.399
  • BSCS. 2008. Scientists and Science Education. Retrieved from http://science.education.nih.gov/sise
  • Bybee, R. W. 2000. “Teaching Science as Inquiry.” In Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, edited by J. Mintrell and E. H. van Zee, 20–46. Washington, DC: American Association of the Advancement of Science.
  • DeWitt, J., and J. Osborne. 2007. “Supporting Teachers on Science-Focused School Trips: Towards an Integrated Framework of Theory and Practice.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (6): 685–710. doi: 10.1080/09500690600802254
  • Duggan, S., and R. Gott. 2002. “What Sort of Science Education do we Really Need.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (7): 661–679. doi: 10.1080/09500690110110133
  • Eastwell, P., and L. Rennie. 2002. “Using Enrichment and Extracurricular Activities to Influence Secondary Students’ Interest and Participation in Science.” The Science Education Review 1: 1–16.
  • Eshach, H. 2007. “Bridging In-School and Out-of-School Learning: Formal, NonFormal, and Informal Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (2): 171–190. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
  • European Commission and High Level Group on Science Education [EC]. 2007. “ Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe (EUR 22845).” Brussels: DG Research. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
  • Evreklia, E., D. Inel, and A. G. Balim. 2010. “Development of a Scoring System to Assess Mind Maps.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010): 2330–2334. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.331
  • Falk, J., and M. Storksdieck. 2005. “Using the Contextual Model of Learning to Understand Visitor Learning from a Science Center Exhibition.” Science Education 89: 744–778. doi: 10.1002/sce.20078
  • Faria, C., G. Pereira, and I. Chagas. 2010. “D. Carlos de Bragança, a Pioneer of Experimental Marine Oceanography: Filling the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Education.” Science and Education 41 (S1): 1–14.
  • Fradd, S., and O. Lee. 1999. “Teachers’ Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry with Students from Diverse Language Backgrounds.” Educational Researcher 28 (6): 4–20. doi: 10.3102/0013189X028006004
  • Geist, E., and A. C. Baum. 2005. “Yeah, but's that Keep Teachers from Embracing an Active Curriculum.” Young Children 60 (4): 28–36.
  • Guilherme, E., C. Faria, and D. Boaventura. 2015. “Exploring Marine Ecosystems with Elementary School Portuguese children: Inquiry-Based Project Activities Focused on ‘Real-Life’ Contexts.” Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.1007884.
  • Harlen, W. 2006. Teaching, Learning & Assessing Science 5–12. London: Sage.
  • Hodson, D. 2010. “Science Education as a Call to Action.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 10 (3): 197–206. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2010.504478
  • Hofstein, A., and V. Lunetta. 2003. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
  • ICSU. 2011. “ Report of the ICSU Ad-hoc Review Panel on Science Education.” Retrieved from http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/report-of-the-icsu-ad-hoc-review-panel-on-science-education/Report%20on%20Science%20Education%20final%20pdf.pdf
  • Jenkins, E. 2000. “Science for all: Time for a Paradigm Shift.” In Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future, edited by R. Millar and J. F. Osborne, 207–226. London: King's College.
  • Johnson, N. 2012. “Teacher's and Student's Perceptions of Problem Solving Difficulties in Physics.” International Multidisciplinary e-Journal 1 (5): 97–101.
  • Kisiel, J. 2005. “Understanding Elementary Teacher Motivations for Science Fieldtrips.” Science Education 89 (6): 936–955. doi: 10.1002/sce.20085
  • Linn, M. C., E. A. Davis, and P. Bell. 2004. Internet Environments for Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Longbottom, J., and P. Butler. 1999. “Why Teach Science? Setting Rational Goals for Science Education.” Science Education 83: 473–492. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<473::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Maaß, K., and M. Artigue. 2013. “Implementation of Inquiry-based Learning in Day-to-Day Teaching: A Synthesis.” ZDM Mathematics Education 45: 779–795. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0
  • Michaels, S., A. W. Shouse, and H. A. Schweingruber. 2007. Ready, Set, Science!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11882.html.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millar, R. 2002. “Towards a Science Curriculum for Public Understanding.” In Teaching Science in Secondary Schools: A Reader, edited by S. Amos and R. Boohan, 112–128. London: Routledge.
  • Milne, I. 2010. “A Sense of Wonder, Arising from Aesthetic Experiences, should be the Starting Point for Inquiry in Primary Science.” Science Education International 21 (2): 102–115.
  • Mohrig, J., C. Hammond, and D. Colby. 2007. “On the Successful Use of Inquiry-Driven Experiments in the Organic Chemistry Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 84 (6): 992–1000. doi: 10.1021/ed084p992
  • Murcia, K. 2007. “Science for the 21st Century: Teaching for Scientific Literacy in the Primary Classroom.” Teaching Science 53 (2): 16–19.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nowicki, B. L., B. Sullivan-Watts, M. K. Shim, B. Young, and R. Pockalny. 2013. “Factors Influencing Science Content Accuracy in Elementary Inquiry Science Lessons.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 1135–1154. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9303-4
  • Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: King's College London, The Nuffield Foundation.
  • Pearson, P. D. 2007. “An Endangered Species act for Literacy Education.” Journal of Literacy Research 39 (2): 145–162.
  • Pepper, C. 2010. “’There's a Lot of Learning Going on but NOT much Teaching!’: Student Perceptions of Problem-Based Learning in Science.” Higher Education Research & Development 29: 693–707. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.501073
  • Schreiner, C., and S. Sjøberg. 2004. Rose. The Relevance of Science Education. Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development.
  • Singer, S. R., M. L. Hilton and H. A. Schwiengruber, eds. 2005. America's Lab Report: Investigations in School Science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Windschitl, M. 2003. “Inquiry Projects in Science Teacher Education: What can Investigative Experiences Reveal about Teacher Thinking and Eventual Classroom Practice?.” Science Education 87 (1): 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.