Multimodal literacy learning opportunities within a grade six classroom literacy curriculum: constraints and enablers

References

• Alvermann, D., and A. Wilson. 2007. “Redefining Adolescent Literacy Instruction.” In Literacy for the New Millennium, edited by B. J. Guzzetti, Vol. 3, 3–20. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. 2012. “The Importance of a New Literacies Stance in Teaching English Language Arts.” In Multimodal Composing in Classrooms: Learning and Teaching for the Digital World, edited by S. Miller and M. McVee, 44–62. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, C. 2006. “Designerly ≠ Readerly: Re-assessing Multimodal and New Media Rubrics for Use in Writing Studies.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research in to New Media Technologies 12 (4): 393–412.
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, C., and C. Fuhrken. 2011. “Writing for the Big Screen: Literacy Experiences in A Moviemaking Project.” Language Arts 89 (2): 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, R., and L. Fung. 2009. “‘The First Year, They Cried’: How Teachers Address Test Stress.” Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy 96: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2006. Spring. “Multiliteracies and Equity: How Do Canadian Schools Measure Up?” Education Canada 46 (2): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., and M. Early. 2011. Identity Texts: The Collaborative Creation of Power in Multilingual Schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. 1992. “Curriculum and Pedagogy.” In Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by P. W. Jackson, 486–516. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 2008. “Staying in the (Curricular) Lines: Practice Constraints and Possibilities in Childhood Writing.” Written Communication 25 (1): 119–159. doi:10.1177/0741088307309552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H., and C. Genishi. 2005. On the Case. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Education Quality and Accountability Office. 2005. “ EQAO Guide to School and Board Improvement Planning: A Handbook for School and Board Leaders.” Accessed July 7, 2015. http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/05/05P011e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Education Quality and Accountability Office. 2015. “ Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test.” Accessed June 16. http://www.eqao.com/students/secondary/10/10.aspx?Lang=E&gr=10.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott-Johns, S. E. 2011. “Exploring Multi-modal Literature Response with Pre-service Teachers.” Learning Landscapes 4 (2): 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, and R. Stooke. 2015. “Introduction.” In Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality, edited by M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, and R. Stooke, 1–14. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Handsfield, L. 2006. “Being and Becoming American: Triangulating Habitus, Field, and Literacy Instruction in a Multilingual Classroom.” Language & Literacy 8 (2): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Harste, J. 2003. “What Do We Mean by Literacy Now?” Voices From the Middle 10 (3): 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A. 2014. “Using Interdisciplinary, Project-based, Multimodal Activities to Facilitate Literacy Across the Content Areas.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57 (6): 450–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannacci, L. 2005. “ Othered Among Others: A Critical Narrative of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Children's Literacy and Identity in Early Childhood Education.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Western University, London, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2003. “Re-thinking Assessment: Multimodality, Literacy and Computer-mediated Learning.” Assessment in Education 10 (1): 84–102. doi:10.1080/09695940301698.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2008a. “Multimodal Discourses Across the Curriculum.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Discourse and Education, edited by M. Martin-Jones, A. M. de Mejia, and N. Hornberger, 2nd ed., 357–367. Boston, MA: Springer Science+Business Media LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2008b. “Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms.” Review of Research in Education 32: 241–267. doi:10.3102/0091732X07310586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., and G. Kress. 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, M., and R. McKay. 2002. “Uncovering Literacy Narratives Through Children's Drawings.” Canadian Journal of Education 27 (1): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, M., and R. McKay. 2004. “Drawings as an Alternative Way of Understanding Young Children's Constructions of Literacy.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 4 (1): 109–128. doi:10.1177/1468798404041458.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J. 2006. “Multiple Literacies, Curriculum, and Instruction in Early Childhood and Elementary School.” Theory Into Practice 45 (4): 319–329. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loerts, T. 2013. “Multimodal Literacy Learning Opportunities in One Grade Six Classroom: Possibilities and Constraints.” Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 1735. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1735.
   Google Scholar
• Lotherington, H., and N. S. Ronda. 2012. “Multimodal Literacies and Assessment: Uncharted Challenges in the English Classroom.” In English: A Changing Medium for Education, edited by C. Leung and B. Street, 105–128. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. 2007. “Semiotic Resourcefulness: A Young Child's Email Exchange as Design.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 7 (2): 155–176. doi:10.1177/1468798407079285.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, C., E. Boling, and J. Rowsell. 2009. “Engaging Diverse Students in Multiple Literacies In and Out of School.” In The Handbook of Research on Literacy Instruction: Issues of Diversity, Policy, and Equity, edited by L. Morrow, R. Rueda, and D. Lapp, 158–172. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. 2010. “Reframing Multimodal Composing for Student Learning: Lessons on Purpose from the Buffalo DV Project.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 10 (2): 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. 2010. “Shrek Meets Vygotsky: Rethinking Adolescents’ Multimodal Literacy Practices in Schools.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 54 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L., C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using A Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory Into Practice 31 (2): 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. 2015. “Beyond Governmentality: The Responsible Exercise of Freedom in Pursuit of Literacy Assessment.” In Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality, edited by M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, and R. Stooke, 25–41. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of English. 2015, February. “ Position Statement: Definition of 21st Century Literacies.” Accessed June 30. http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–93. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. 2006. The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8: Language. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. 2015. “ The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.” Accessed May 13. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/moreinfo.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. 2003. “Children's Text-making at Home: Transforming Meaning Across Modes.” In Multimodal Literacy, edited by C. Jewitt and G. Kress, 139–155. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. 2006. “Birds, Frogs, Blue Skies and Sheep: An Investigation Into the Cultural Notion of Affordance in Children's Meaning Making.” English in Education 40 (1): 20–35. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2006.tb00780.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., and J. Rowsell. 2005. Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. S., and J. McClay. 2014. “A National Study of Teaching and Assessing Writing in Canadian Middle Grades Classrooms.” McGill Journal of Education/Revue des Sciences de L'éducation de McGill 49 (1): 17–39.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, B. 2011. “Remixing the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT).” Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education 1 (1): 164–182.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. 2010. “Participatory Case Study.” In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, edited by A. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, 658–660. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J. 2013. Working with Multimodality: Rethinking Literacy in a Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., and P. Albers. 2010. “Multimodal Literacies: An Introduction.” In Literacies, the Arts, and Multimodality, edited by J. Sanders and P. Albers, 1–24. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, M., D. Birch, and M. Gardiner. 2011. “The Impact of Multiple Representations of Content Using Multimedia on Learning Outcomes Across Learning Styles and Modal Preferences.” International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology 7 (3): 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., S. Kontovourki, S. Schmier, and G. Enriquez. 2008. “Literacy in Motion: A Case Study of a Shape-shifting Kindergartener.” Language Arts 86 (2): 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Slomp, D. H. 2005. “Teaching and Assessing Language Skills: Defining the Knowledge That Matters.” English Teaching Practice and Critique 4 (3): 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln., 3rd ed., 443–467. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, P. 2008. Multimodal Pedagogies in Diverse Classrooms: Representation, Rights and Resources. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, D. S. 1994. “Reinventing Our Literacy Programs: Books, Basics, Balance.” The Reading Teacher 48 (4): 294–302.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2005. “Washback and Impact.” ELT Journal 59 (1): 154–155.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L., and E. Chan. 2009. “Bridging Multimodal Literacies and National Assessment Programs in Literacy.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 32 (3): 245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L. 2004. “Teaching to the Test: What Every Educator and Policy-Maker Should Know.” Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy 35. Accessed June 16, 2015. https://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/volante.html.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. 2007. “Creativity as Capital in the Literacy Classroom: Youth as Multimodal Designers.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 41 (2): 79–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00461.x.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. 2009. “Pedagogic Potentials of Multimodal Literacy.” In Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K–12 Level: Issues and Challenges, edited by L. Tan and R. Subramaniam, 32–47. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. 2010. “Multimodal Literacy: What Does It Mean for Classroom Practice?” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 33 (3): 211–239.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. 2011. Multimodal Literacy: Researching Classroom Practice. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. T. 2005. “Leading Double Lives: Literacy and Technology in and out of School.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 48 (8): 702–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. 2003. “Supporting Young Children's Thinking Through Tableau.” Language Arts 80 (5): 375–383.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar