Publication Cover
Education 3-13
International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education
Volume 45, 2017 - Issue 4
1,586
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transnational comparisons of teacher expectation of mathematical functional ability in early years and Key Stage 1 pupils – a study undertaken in Hong Kong and England

&
Pages 504-515 | Received 28 Sep 2015, Accepted 17 Dec 2015, Published online: 12 Feb 2016

References

  • Alexander, R. 2011. Could Do Even Better – Making the Most of International Comparison as a Tool of Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge Primary Review Team at Cambridge University.
  • Andrews, P. 2007. “Mathematics Teacher Typologies or Nationally Located Patterns of Behaviour.” International Journal of Educational Research 46 (5): 306–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.001
  • Andrews, P. 2010. International Comparisons of Mathematics Teaching: Searching for Consensus in Describing Opportunities for Learning. London: APA.
  • Aubrey, C., S. Dahi, and R. Godfrey. 2006. “Early Mathematics Development and Later Achievement: Further Evidence.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 18 (1): 27–46. doi: 10.1007/BF03217428
  • Aunio, P. C., C. Aubrey, R. Godfrey, P. Yuajuan, and Y. Liu. 2008. “Children's Early Numeracy in England, Finland and People's Republic of China.” International Journal of Early Years Education 16 (1): 203–221. doi: 10.1080/09669760802343881
  • Browne, E. 2012. “Changing Localities for Teacher Training: The Potential Impact on Professional Formation and the University Sector Response.” Journal of Education for Teaching 38: 497–508. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2012.709747
  • Browne, E. 2013. “The Changing Localities for Teacher Education.” Brookes Electronic Journal of Teaching and Learning 5 (2): 202–205.
  • Chen, C., and H. W. Stevenson. 1989. “Homework: A Cross-Cultural Examination.” Child Development 60: 551–561. doi: 10.2307/1130721
  • Department for Education (DfE). 2012. The New National Curriculum in England. London: Department for Education.
  • Department for Education (DfE). 2013. The National Curriculum in England: Key Stage 1 and 2 Framework Document. London: Department for Education.
  • Dweck, C. 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
  • Geary, D. C. 1994. Children's Mathematical Development: Research and Practical Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Geary, D. C., C. C. Bow-Thomas, L. Fan, and R. S. Siegler. 1993. “Even Before Formal Instruction, Chinese Children Outperform American Children in Mental Addition.” Cognitive Development 8: 517–529. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(05)80007-3
  • Geary, D. C., C. C. Bow-Thomas, F. Liu, and R. S. Siegler. 1996. “Development of Arithmetical Competencies in Chinese and American Children: Influence of Age, Language, and Schooling.” Child Development 67: 2022–2044. doi: 10.2307/1131607
  • Ginsburg, H. C., Y. E. Choi, L. S. Lopez, R. Netley, and C.-Y. Chi. 1997. “Happy Birthday to You: Early Mathematical Thinking of Asian, South American and U.S. Children.” In Learning and Teaching Mathematics: An International Perspective, edited by T. Nunes and P. Bryant, 163–207. Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Hattie, J. A. 2003. Teachers Make a Difference – What is the Research Evidence. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Hattie, J. A. 2006. Identifying Expert Teachers. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Association for Research in Education.
  • Kimberly, Kimberly 2013. Asian Nations Dominate International Test. http://www.google.co.uk/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwimx6T_cnKAhXLVRoKHWwQAMIQFggfMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fasian-nations-dominate-international-test100159386.html&usg=AFQjCNEt2o1SjpGx2sadqPHN9gciu6f32g&sig2=tuQTAxGnpaKR006cGDoPow&bvm=bv.112766941,d.d2s.
  • HKEDB. 2006. The Guide to the Pre-Primary Curriculum. Hong Kong: The Curriculum Development Council of Hong Kong.
  • Howse, P. 2014. “Pupils from Poor Families ‘Still at Disadvantage’.” Accessed February 18, 2014. www.bbcnews.educationandfamilies.shanghiavisitforministertolearnmathslessons/.
  • Huntsinger, C. S., P. E. Jose, F. R. Liaw, and W. Ching. 1997. “Cultural Differences in Early Mathematics Learning: A Comparison of Euro-American, Chinese-American, and Taiwan-Chinese Families.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 21: 371–388. doi: 10.1080/016502597384929
  • Hycock, K. 2006. “No More Invisible Kids.” Educational Leadership 64 (3): 38–42.
  • Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • KPMG. 2008. ‘The Long Term Costs of Numeracy Difficulties.’ Every Child A Chance. London: KPMG.
  • Lane, K., E. Carter, E. Common, and A. Jordan. 2012. “Teacher Expectations for Student Performance: Lessons Learned and Implications for Research and Practice.” In Classroom Behaviour, Contexts, and Interventions (Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Volume 25), edited by Bryan G. Cook, Melody Tankersley, and Timothy J. Landrum, 95–129. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Child Dev. 2010 Nov–Dec;81(6):1753–1767. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x.
  • Le Fevre, J. A., L. Fast, S. L. Skwarchuk, B. L. Smith-Chant, J. Bisanz, D. Kamawar, and M. Penner-Wilger. 2010. Pathways to Mathematics: Longitudinal Predictors of Performance. Miami: Child Development © 2010 Society for Research in Child Development.
  • Loveless, T. 2014. “ The Brooking Review of PISA.” Accessed September 14, 2014. www.brooking.org.uk/pisa'children.
  • Ma, L. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • National Numeracy Charity. 2014. “What the Research Says.” Accessed July 22, 2014. www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk (www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk/what-the-research-says/index.html page 5.
  • National College of School Leadership (NCSL). 2013. “ Report on Research into Maths and Science Teaching in the Shanghai Region, China.” National College of School Leadership, January 11–18.
  • Oates, T. 2010. Could Do Better: Using International Comparisons to Refine the National Curriculum in England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate.
  • Oates, T. 2012. Could Do Better: Using International Comparisons to Refine the National Curriculum in England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate (addendum to the 2010 report).
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2012. “PISA 2009 Technical Report.” Accessed August 12, 2014. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/31/50036771.pdf. Hefling, Kimberly, “Asian nations dominate international test”.
  • Perry, M. 2010. “Explanations of Mathematical Concepts in Japanese, Chinese and U.S. First- and Fifth-Grade Classrooms.” Cognition and Instruction 18: 181–207. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1802_02
  • Porkess, R., C. Budd, R. Dunne, P. Rahman-Hart, and C. Vorderman. 2011. A World-Class Mathematics Education for All Our Young People. The Vorderman Report. London: Department for Education.
  • Richard Wong, K.-S. 2014. “ Unpublished Keynote Presentation at a Transnational Conference.” Edge Hill University, March 30.
  • Rosental, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teachers Expectations and Pupils Intellectual Development. New York, Holt, Rheinhead and Winstone.
  • Siegler, R. S., and Y. Mu. 2008. “Chinese Children Excel on Novel Mathematics Problems Even Before Elementary School.” Psychological Science 19 (8): 759–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02153.x
  • Slattery, P. 1997. “ Post-modern Curriculum Research and Alternative forms of Data Presentation.” Public Seminar Paper, University of Alberta, September 29.
  • Skills for Life Survey. 2011. Accessed January 1, 2015. www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk/research_skills_for_life2011.
  • Stevenson, H. W., C. Chen, and S. Y. Lee. 1993. “Mathematics Achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children: Ten Years Later.” Science 259: 53–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8418494
  • Stewart, W. 2014. “ Is Pisa Fundamentally Flawed?” Published in TESS on July 26, 2013. Accessed November 12, 2014. www.tess/ispisafundamentallyflawed.
  • Trouilloud, D., P. Sarrazin, T. Martinek, and E. Guillet. 2002. “The Influence of Teacher Expectations on Students’ Achievement in Physical Education Classes: Pygmalion Revisited.” European Journal of Social Psychology 32: 591–607.
  • Woolston, W. 2008. “ Do ‘Great Expectations’ Matter? The Relationship between Teacher Expectations and Student Academic Success.” Presentation for: The Institute for Research on Education Policy & Practice, Stanford University, October.
  • Zhou, X., J. Huang, Z. Wang, B. Wang, Z. Zhao, L. Yang, and Y. Zhengzheng. 2006. “Parent-child Interaction and Children's Number Learning.” Early Child Development and Care 176: 763–775. doi: 10.1080/03004430500232680

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.