An analysis of the cultural representation of disability in school textbooks in Iran and England

References

• Allen, J. 2008. Rethinking Inclusive Education – The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alverman, D. E., and M. Commeyras. 2005. Gender, Text, and Discussion: Expanding the Possibilities. http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/clic/nrrs/alvercom.html.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. 1992. “The Text and Cultural Politics.” Educational Researcher 21 (7): 4–19. doi: 10.3102/0013189X021007004
   Google Scholar
• Azimi, A. 2007. “Recent Initiatives in Schools Effectiveness and Improvement: The Case of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement: Review, Reflection and Reframing, edited by T. Townsend, 379–395. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Babaii, E., and H. Ansary. 2003. “Subliminal Sexism in Current ESL/EFL Textbooks.” Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, M. 1994. “Images of Chinese and Chinese Americans Mirrored in Picture Books.” Children’s Literature in Education 25 (3): 169–191. doi: 10.1007/BF02355394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and A. Harnett. 1996. Education and the Struggle for Democracy. Buckingham: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, S. 2003. “ Ethnic and Linguistic Dimensions of Inclusive Education.” Paper presented to Quality Education in Multiethnic Society Mukachevo, Ukraine, April 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Commeyras, M., and D. E. Alvermann. 1996. “Reading about Women in World History Textbooks from one Feminist Perspective.” Gender and Education 8 (1): 31–48. doi: 10.1080/713668481
   Google Scholar
• Chelkowski, P. J., and H. Dabashi. 2002. Staging a Revolution: The Art of Persuasion in the Islamic Republic of Iran. London: Booth-Clibborn.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 1998. “Introduction.” In What’s Special about Inclusive Education?, edited by P. Clough, 1–3. London: Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 2005. “Exclusive Tendencies: Concepts, Consciousness and Curriculum in the Project of Inclusion.” In Curriculum and Pedagogy in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice, edited by M. Nind, R. Rix, K. Sheey and K. Simmons, 73–81. Buckingham: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2000. Researching the Ideological and Political Role of the History Textbook. Issues and Methods – 2nd European Conference of Children’s Identity and Citizenship in Europe, University of Athens, Greece, May 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2004. “ Inter Cultural Education: The Role of School Textbook Analysis in Shaping a Critical Discourse on Nation and Society.” Paper presented at the Pacific Circle Consortium 27th Annual Conference, Hong Kong, Institute of Education, April 21st–23rd, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, E., and A. A. Mahdi. 2006. Culture and Customs of Iran (Culture and Customs of the Middle East). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, R. G. 2001. “Representing the Inuit in Contemporary British and Canadian Juvenile Non Fiction.” Children’s Literature in Education 32 (2): 139–154. doi: 10.1023/A:1010338629474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE (Department of Education). 2011. http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/c/sfr24-2012c1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department of Education and Skills). 2004. Removing Barriers to Achievement. The Governments Strategy for SEN. Executive Summary. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, D. 1996. “A Sociological Analysis of School Mathematics Texts.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 31: 389–415. doi: 10.1007/BF00369156
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and I. Lunt. 2002. “Inclusive Education Are There Limits?” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Inclusive Education, edited by K. Topping and S. Maloney, 41–54. (2005). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, K. P. 1992. “Prejudice and Underlying Assumption.” In History and Social Studies- Methodologies of Textbook Analysis, edited by H. Bourdillion, 25–36. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. M. Y., and A. J. Metcalfe. 2005. “The Need for a New Model.” In Curriculum and Pedagogy in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice, edited by M. Nind, R. Rix, K. Sheey and K. Simmons, 31–38. Buckingham: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. E. 2002. “Everybody Just Freezes. Everybody Is Just Embarrassed’: Felt and Enacted Stigma among Parents of Children with High Functioning Autism.” Sociology of Health & Illness 24 (6): 734–749. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M., and K. Subrahmanyam. 2003. “Online Discourse in a Teen Chatroom: New Codes and new Modes of Coherence in a Visual Medium.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24: 713–738. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. J. 2002. “Involvement with Peers: Comparisons between Young Children with and Without Down’s Syndrome.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46 (5): 379–393. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00405.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highbeam. 2005. Accessed May 11, 2006. www.highbeam.cum.
   Google Scholar
• HSRC – Human Science Research Council of South Africa. 2005. Accessed April 11, 2005. www.hsrc.ac.za/media.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, E. B. 1993. Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope: A Critical Survey of Literature and Research on Educational Texts. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kell-Byrne, D. 1984. “The 1984 Conference of the Children’s Literature Association, Charlotte, North Caroline, May 24–27: A Participant’s Response.” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 9: 195–8. doi: 10.1353/chq.0.0513
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2000. Feminist content analysis and representative characters. The Qualitative Report 5, no. 1/2. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR5-1/leavy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, C., S. De Castell, and A. Luke. 1989. “Beyond Criticism: the Authority of the Schoolbook.” In Language, Authority and Criticism, edited by D. E. Castell, A. Luke, and C. Luke, 245–260. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, R. F., & Kumari, R. (2007). “Effective Use of Textbooks: A Neglected Aspect of Education in Pakistan.” Journal of Education for International Development 3 (1). http://www.equip123.net/jeid/articles/5/EffectiveUseTextbooks.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. 2005. “Introduction: Models and Practice in Inclusive Curricula.” In Curriculum and Pedagogy in Inclusive Education: Values Into Practice, edited by M. Nind, J. Rix, K. Sheehy, and K. Simmons, 1–11. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ninnes, P. 2002. “Discursive Space(s) in Science Curriculum Materials in Canada, Australia and Aotearou/New Zealand.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 34 (5): 557–570. doi: 10.1080/00220270110114081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. 1989. “On the Language and Authority of Textbooks.” In Language, Authority and Criticism, edited by S. DE Castell, A. Luke, and C. Luke, 233–244. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Palls, B. 2010. Cultural Portraits: A Synoptic Guide. 2nd ed. Oak Brook: BandB Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Podeh, E. (2005). How Israeli Textbooks Portray the Arab–Israel Conflict. Accessed May 11, 2006. www.Leachkidspeak.com/doc 213.pl.
   Google Scholar
• Rasche, D., and J. Bronson. 1999. Creative Educators at Work: All Children Including Those with Disabilities Can Play Traditional Classroom Games. http://www.uni.edu/coe/inclusion/preparing/.
   Google Scholar
• Royal geographical society. n.d. http://www.rgs.org/nr/rdonlyres/7189b4b5-5b9a-46ce-bbf5-440cb903030c/0/englisheducationsystem.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Runswick-Cole, K. 2011. “Time to End the Bias towards Inclusive Education?” British Journal of Special Education 38 (3): 112–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8578.2011.00514.x
   Google Scholar
• Sandhull, O. 2005. “ Strengthening Inclusive Education by Applying Rights-Based Approaches to Education Programming.” Paper presented to ISREC 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 2001. “Driven to the Margins: Disabled Pupils, Inclusive Schooling and the Politics of Possibility.” Cambridge Journal of Education 31 (3): 385–397. doi: 10.1080/03057640120086620
   Google Scholar
• State Welfare Organization. 2009. Justice in Education. http://behzisti.ir/News/Show.aspx?id=6907.
   Google Scholar
• Stray, C. 1994. “Paradigms Regained: Towards a Historical Sociology of the Textbook.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 26 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1080/0022027940260101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxel, J. 1989. “Children’s Literature: A Research Proposal from the Perspective of the Sociology of School Knowledge.” In Language, Authority and Criticism, edited by S. De Castell, A. Luke, and C. Luke, 32–45. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. 1990. “Textbooks, Textbook Publishers, and the Quality of Schooling.” In NSSE Yearbook 1990: Part I, edited by W. Arthur, and D. L. Elliott, 1–22. Chicago: Textbooks and Schooling in the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. J. 2001. “The Effects of Inclusionary Programs on the Self-concept of Learning Disabled Students.” Unpublished Manuscript, The Graduate School University of Wisconsin. http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2001/2001wiemanc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wigginton, S. 2005. “Characters or Caricature: Representations of Blackness in Dominican Social Science Textbooks.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 8 (2): 191–211. doi: 10.1080/13613320500110576
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1961. The Long Revolution. London: Chatt.
   Google Scholar
• Zic, A., and L. Igri. 2001. “Self-assessment of Relationships with Peers in Children with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 45 (3): 202–211. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00311.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimet, S. G. 1976. Print and Prejudice. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar