The effect of peer-mediated skill generalisation activities on the social acceptance of individuals with special needs in Turkey

References

• Aktan, O. 2021. “Özel gereksinimli bireylere yönelik öğretmen sosyal kabul ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.” Trakya Eğitim Dergisi 11 (1): 315–332.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, C., and S. Küçüker. 2002. “Bilişsel-duyuşsal odaklı bir programın ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fiziksel engelli yaşıtlarına yönelik sosyal kabul düzeylerine etkisinin incelenmesi.” Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi 3 (2): 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., A. Toulia, C. Tsihouridis, and V. Stroglios. 2019. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion and Their Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Practices as Predictors of Willingness to Implement Peer Tutoring.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 19: 49–59. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayvazo, S., and E. Aljadeff-Abergel. 2019. “Classwide Peer Tutoring in a Martial Arts Alternative Education Program: Enhancing Social and Psychomotor Skills.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 63 (4): 359–368. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2019.1619509.
   Google Scholar
• Balcı, A. 2015. Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem teknik ve ilkeler (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Baydık, B., and H. Bakkaloğlu. 2009. "Alt sosyoekonomik düzeydeki özel gereksinimli olan ve olmayan ilköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyometrik statülerini yordayan değişkenler." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 9 (2): 401–447.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, E. E., E. W. Carter, and J. R. Gustafson. 2017. “Efficacy of Collaborative Planning and Peer Support Arrangements to Increase Peer Interaction and AAC use in Inclusive Classrooms.” American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 122: 25–48. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brock, M. E., E. E. Biggs, E. W. Carter, G. N. Cattey, and K. S. Raley. 2016. “Implementation and Generalization of Peer Support Arrangements for Students with Severe Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms.” The Journal of Special Education 49 (4): 221–232. doi:10.1177/0022466915594368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, M. E., and E. W. Carter. 2016. "Efficacy of Teachers Training Paraprofessionals to Implement Peer Support Arrangements." Exceptional Children  82 (3): 354-371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, M. E., and H. B. Huber. 2017. “Are Peer Support Arrangements an Evidence-Based Practice? A Systematic Review.” The Journal of Special Education 51 (3): 150–163. doi:10.1177/0022466917708184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomhead, K. E. 2019. “Acceptance or Rejection? The Social Experiences of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Within a Mainstream Primary School.” Education 3-13 47 (8): 877–888. doi:10.1080/03004279.2018.1535610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burcu, E. 2011. "Türkiye’de engelli bireylere ilişkin kültürel tanımlamalar: Ankara örneği." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (1): 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. 2011. Deneysel desenler: Öntest sontest kontrol gruplu desen ve veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş, E. K. Çakmak, ÖE Akgün, Ş Karadeniz, and F. Demirel. 2017. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, 1–360. Ankara: Pegem.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., and A. Rutland. 2006. “Extended Contact Through Story Reading in School: Reducing Students’ Prejudice Toward the Disabled.” Journal of Social Issues 62 (3): 469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter E. W., K. Bottema-Beutel, and M. E. Brock. 2014. "Social Interactions and Friendships." In Equity and Full Participation for Individuals with Severe Disabilities: A Vision for the Future, edited by M. Agran, F. Brown, C. Hughes, C. Quirk, and D. Ryndak, 197–216. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W. 2017. “The Promise and Practice of Peer Support Arrangements for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.” International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities 52: 141–174. doi:10.1016/bs.irrdd.2017.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W. 2018. “Supporting the Social Lives of Secondary Students With Severe Disabilities: Considerations for Effective Intervention.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 26 (1): 52–61. doi:10.1177/1063426617739253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., J. Asmus, C. K. Moss, E. E. Biggs, D. M. Bolt, T. L. Born, M. E. Brock, et al. 2016. “Randomized Evaluation of Peer Support Arrangements to Support the Inclusion of High School Students With Severe Disabilities.” Exceptional Children 82 (2): 209–233. doi:10.1177/0014402915598780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., C. K. Moss, J. Asmus, E. Fesperman, M. Cooney, M. E. Brock, G. Lyons, H. B. Huber, and L. B. Vincent. 2015. “Promoting Inclusion, Social Connections, and Learning Through Peer Support Arrangements.” Teaching Exceptional Children 48 (1): 9–18. doi:10.1177/0040059915594784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., C. K. Moss, A. Hoffman, Y. C. Chung, and L. Sisco. 2011. “Efficacy and Social Validity of Peer Support Arrangements for Adolescents with Disabilities.” Exceptional Children 78: 107–125. doi:10.1177/001440291107800107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civelek, A. H. 1990. Eğitilebilir zihinsel özürlü çocukların sosyal kabul görmelerinde normal çocukların bilgilendirilmelerinin ve iki grubun resim-iş ile beden eğitimi derslerinde bütünleştirilmelerinin etkileri. Ankara: Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
   Google Scholar
• Cockerill, M., N. Craig, and A. Thurston. 2018. “Teacher Perceptıons of the ımpact of Peer Learnıng ın Theır Classrooms: Usıng Socıal ınterdependence Theory as a Model for Data Analysıs and Presentatıon.” International Journal Of Education And Practice 6 (1): 14–27. doi:10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. C., B. G. Cook, and L. Cook. 2017. “Classifying the Evidence Base of Classwide Peer Tutoring for Students with High-Incidence Disabilities.” Exceptionality 25 (1): 9–25. doi:10.1080/09362835.2016.1196448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fırat, T. 2021. “An Exploration of the Effects of Learning Through ‘Interaction Activities’ on Eighth-Graders’ Social Acceptance of Students with Special Needs in Turkey.” Education 3-13 49 (7): 792–808. doi:10.1080/03004279.2020.1790022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y., G. W. Whiting, R. B. Goings, and S. A. Robinson. 2017. “Culturally Different Students in Special Education: Issues, Theories, and Recommendations to Address Overrepresentation.” In The Handbook of Diversity in Special Education, edited by M. T. Hughes, and E. Talbott, 131–148. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garrote, A. 2017. “The Relationship Between Social Participation and Social Skills of Pupils with an Intellectual Disability: A Study in Inclusive Classrooms.” Frontline Learning Research 5 (1): 1–15. doi:10.14786/flr.v5i1.266.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., S. K. Baker, J. Smith-Johnson, J. Dimino, and A. Peterson. 2006. “Eyes on the Prize: Teaching Complex Historical Content to Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities.” Exceptional Children 72: 264–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girli, A., and S. Atasoy. 2012. “Kaynaştırmaya Yerleştirilen Zihin Yetersizliği veya Otistik Özellikleri Olan Öğrencilerin Okul Yaşantılari ve Akranlarıyla İlişkilerine İlişkin Görüşleri.” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 32: 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson-Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlock, E. 1978. Child Development. United States: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L. 2016. “Benefits of Peer Tutoring Students with Disabilities in a Secondary School Setting.” Unpublished Master thesis, Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Kapil, Y., and S. Malini. 2017. “Peer Tutoring an Instructional Strategy: A Systematic Approach.” Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language 6 (27): 7792–7798.
   Google Scholar
• Koç Başaran, Y. 2017. “Sosyal Bilimlerde Örnekleme Kuramı.” The Journal of Academic Social Science 5: 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, B., and C. Altwasser. 2006. “Changing Negative Attitudes Towards Person with Physical Disabilities.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16: 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarland, T. W., and J. M. Yates. 2016. Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics for the Biological Sciences Using R. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maheady, L., and J. Gard. 2010. “Classwide Peer Tutoring: Practice, Theory, Research, and Personal Narrative.” Intervention in School and Clinic 46 (2): 71–78. doi:10.1177/1053451210376359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J., and P. Hunt. 2014. Inclusive Education and Meaningful School Outcomes. Equity & Full Participation for Individuals with Severe Disabilities, 155–176. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Mellado, M. E., V. Valdebenito, and O. Aravena. 2017. “Peer Tutoring to Develop Social Skills among University Students.” International Jorunal of Pedagogies & Learning 12 (2): 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miravet, L. M., A. S. Ciges, and O. M. García. 2014. “An Experience of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring at the University.” Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 2809–2812.
   Google Scholar
• Moliner, L., and F. Alegre. 2020. “Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge of Mathematics Teachers Regarding Peer Tutoring.” European Journal of Teacher Education 45 (1): 93–11210.1080/02619768.2020.1803271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgönenel, S., and A. Girli. 2016. “Otizmli Kaynaştırma Öğrencilerinin Sınıflarında Akran İlişkilerinin Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Eğitim Programının Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi.” İlköğretim Online 15 (1): 0–0. doi:10.17051/io.2016.35667.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan Yaşaran, Ö, E. Batu, and A. Özen. 2014. “Özel Gereksinimli Bireylerin Sosyal Kabullerini Sağlamada Normal Gelişim Gösteren Öğrencilere Sunulan Kaynaştırmaya Hazırlık Etkinliklerinin Etkisi.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14 (3): 167–180. doi:10.18037/ausbd.92732.
   Google Scholar
• Özkubat, U., H. Sanır, G. Töret, and A. Babacan. 2016. “Yetersizlikten etkilenmiş çocukların sosyal kabullerini sağlamada kaynaştırmaya hazırlık etkinliklerinin etkisi.” Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2 (3): 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park. CA. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Piccirilli, R. A. R. 2015. “Peer tutors: a project to ımprove ınclusıve practıces at an urban elementary school.” Unpublished Master thesis, California State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sazak-Pınar, E., and S. Zelyurt. 2013. “Akran aracılı sunulan etkileşim ünitesi öğretim materyalinin zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin tane kavramını öğrenmeleri üzerindeki etkililiği.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (3): 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, S., M. Gebhardt, and C. Huber. 2016. “Social Acceptance of Students with Down Syndrome and Students Without Disability. Educational Psychology.” An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology 36 (8): 1501–1515. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1059924.
   Google Scholar
• Selimoğlu, H., and A. Aydan. 2019. “The Effect of Peer-Tutoring Method on Social Acceptance and Self-Esteem of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 34 (3): 639–658. doi:10.16986/HUJE.2018042227.
   Google Scholar
• Smoot, S. L. 2004. "An Outcome Measure for Social Goals of Inclusion." Rural Special Education Quarterly 23 (3): 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. "Issues and Dilemmas in Teaching Research Methods Courses in Social and Behavioural Sciences: US Perspective." International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6 (1): 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., L. S. Fidell, and J. B. Ullman. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5 vols., 481–498. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Talbott, E., A. Trzaska, and J. L. Zurheide. 2017. A Systematic Review of Peer Tutoring Interventions for Students with Disabilities, 321. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell: The Wiley Handbook of Diversity in Special Education. doi:10.1002/9781118768778.ch16.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K., C. Buchs, D. Duran, and H. van Keer. 2017. Effective Peer Learning: From Principles to Practical Implementation. 1st ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315695471.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., R. Dehkinet, S. Blanch, M. Corcelles, and D. Duran. 2013. “Paradoxical Effects of Feedback in International Online Reciprocal Peer Tutoring.” Computers & Education 61: 225–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulia, A., V. Strogilos, and E. Avramidis. 2021. “Peer Tutoring as a Means to Inclusion: A Collaborative Action Research Project.” Educational Action Research 1–17 doi: 10.1080/09650792.2021.1911821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle, M., and E. W. Carter. 2020. “Examining Peer Support Arrangements for Students with Visual Impairment.” British Journal of Visual Impairment 40 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1177/0264619620972150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uçar, C. 2008. Farklı gelişenleri kabul edici tutum geliştirme programının normal gelişen öğrenci tutumlarının değişimine etkisi. İstanbul: Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
   Google Scholar
• Valdebenito Zambrano, V., and D. Duran Gisbert. 2015. “The Coordinating Role Of The Teacher In A Peer Tutoring Programme.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191: 2300–2306.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., and H. Şimşek. 2011. Sosyal bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, K. M., and B. R. Ingersoll. 2013. Improving Social Skills in Adolescents and Adults with Autism and Severe to Profound Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43 (3): 594–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissinger, D. R. 2017. “Empowering Academically Diverse Learners in History Classrooms”.” In The Handbook of Diversity in Special Education, edited by M. T. Hughes, and E. Talbott, 299–319. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., A. Matthews, M. Mayberry, J. Owen-DeSchryver, and E. W. Carter. 2020. “From Barriers to Belonging: Promoting Inclusion and Relationships Through the Peer to Peer Program.” Teaching Exceptional Children 52 (6): 426–434. doi:10.1177/0040059920906519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar