1,224
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Perceived, expressed and observed prosociality among four-year-old girls and boys in childcare centres

, , , , , & show all
Pages 44-65 | Received 10 Dec 2013, Accepted 10 Mar 2014, Published online: 09 Apr 2014

References

  • Amboulé-Abath, A. (2009). Étude qualitative portant sur les rapports égalitaires (garçons et filles) en service de garde [Qualitative study on gender equality among children in childcare]. Unpublished manuscript, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
  • Arbeau, K. A., & Coplan, R. J. (2007). Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs and responses to hypothetical prosocial, asocial, and antisocial children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53(2), 291–318. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2007.0007
  • Baudelot, C., & Establet, R. (1992). Allez les filles! [You go girls!]. Paris: Le Seuil.
  • Berndt, T. J. (1981). Effects of friendship on prosocial intentions and behavior. Child Development, 52(2), 635–643. doi: 10.2307/1129184
  • Bernicot, J., & Trognon, A. (2002). Aspects pragmatiques du langage, de la communication et de la cognition: état des recherches et perspectives [Pragmatic aspects of language, communication and cognition: Current research and future prospects]. In J. Bernicot, A. Trognon, M. Guidetti, & M. Musiol (Eds.), Pragmatique et psychologie [Pragmatics and psychology] (pp. 13–32). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
  • Besnard, T. (2013, May). Existe-t-il des différences entre les hommes et les femmes éducatrices en petite enfance? [Are there differences between male and female early childhood educators?] Paper presented at the Fifteenth Biannual AIFREF Network International Conference ‘Family, School, and Local Societies: Policies and Practices for Children’, Patras University, Greece.
  • Bierhoff, H.-W. (2002). Culture, the individual, and level of helpfulness. In H.-W. Bierhoff (Ed.), Prosocial behaviour (pp. 25–40). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Bierman, K. (2009, November). Investing in our Future: Fostering educational success by promoting school readiness. Paper presented at the conference ‘Préparation et réussite scolaire ultérieure: de la recherche aux pratiques et aux politiques’ [School readiness and later achievement: From research to practice to policies], Québec, Canada.
  • Block, J., & Block, J. H. (1980). Perception des compétences sociales: adaptation du California Child Q-Sort [Perception of social competence: Adaptation of the California Child Q-Sort]. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Bond, N. D., & Phillips, B. N. (1971). Personality traits associated with altruistic behavior of children. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 24–34. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(71)90061-6
  • Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Vitiello, V. E. (2012). Observations of children's interactions with teachers, peers, and tasks across preschool classroom activity settings. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 517–538. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2010.548767
  • Bosacki, S. L. (2003). Psychological pragmatics in preadolescents: Sociomoral understanding, self-worth, and school behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 141–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1021861902463
  • Bouchard, C. (2004). Fondements des différences liées au genre dans la prosocialité des enfants en maternelle [Foundations of gender differences in children's prosociality among kindergarteners] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
  • Bouchard, C., Bouchard, M.-C., & Duval, S. (2012). Grille d'observation de la prosocialité observée [Prosociality observation scale]. Unpublished manuscript, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
  • Bouchard, C., Cloutier, R., Gravel, F., & Sutton, A. (2008). The role of language skills in perceived prosociality in kindergarten boys and girls. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(3), 338–357. doi: 10.1080/17405620600823744
  • Bouchard, C., Cloutier, R., & Gravel, G. (2006). Différences garçons-filles en matière de prosocialité [Gender differences in prosociality among children]. Enfance, 4, 377–393. doi: 10.3917/enf.584.0377
  • Bouchard, C., Coutu, S., & Landry, S. (2012). Le développement de la prosocialité chez l'enfant [The development of prosociality among children]. In J.-P. Lemelin, M. A. Provost, G. M. Tarabulsy, A. Plamondon, & C. Dufresne (Eds.), Développement social et émotionnel chez l'enfant et l'adolescent I: Les bases du développement [Socio-emotional development in children and teenagers I: The foundations of development] (pp. 385–425). Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
  • Bouchard, C., Gravel, F., & Cloutier, R. (2006). Prosocialité des enfants à la maternelle québécoise: une explication des différences liées au genre [Prosociality among kindergarteners in Quebec: An explanation of gender differences]. Bulletin de psychologie, 59(4), 369–379. doi: 10.3917/bupsy.484.0369
  • Bouchard, C., Sutton, A., Blain-Brière, B., Pagé, P., & Eryasa, J. (2011, April). The moderating of pragmatic skills in the relationships between perceived prosociality and gender of preschool children. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Child Development (SRCD) Biennial Meeting, Montréal, Canada.
  • Bouchard, P., & Saint-Amant, J.-C. (1993). La réussite scolaire des filles et l'abandon des garçons: un enjeu à portée politique pour les femmes [Academic achievement among girls vs. school dropout among boys: A challenge of political significance for women]. Recherches féministes, 6(2), 21–37. doi: 10.7202/057749ar
  • Bouchard, P., & Saint-Amant, J.-C. (1996). Garçons et filles. Stéréotypes et réussite scolaire [Boys and Girls. Stereotypes and Academic Achievement]. Montréal: Les Éditions du remue-ménage.
  • Bouchard, P., & Saint-Amant, J.-C. (1998). Profils contrastés d'un groupe de garçons québécois de 15 ans [Mixed profiles in a group of 15 year-old boys in Quebec]. Recherches féministes, 11(2), 23–42. doi: 10.7202/058003ar
  • Bowen, F. (1990). Le développement des conduites prosociales et antisociales entre les pairs: aspects conceptuels, méthodologiques et théoriques [The development of prosocial and antisocial behaviours among peers: Conceptual, methodological and theoretical aspects]. In M. A. Provost (Ed.), Le développement social des enfants: perspectives méthodologiques, théoriques et critiques [Social development among children: Methodological, theoretical and critical perspectives] (pp. 57–120). Montréal: Éditions Agence d'ARC.
  • Burleson, B. R., Applegate, J. L., Burke, J. A., & Clark, R. (1986). Communicative correlates of peer acceptance in childhood. Communication Education, 35, 349–361. doi: 10.1080/03634528609388359
  • Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904
  • Cauley, K., & Tyler, B. (1989). The relationship of self-concept to prosocial behavior in children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4(1), 51–60. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(89)90064-1
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
  • Coplan, R. J., & Arbeau, K. A. (2009). Peer interactions and plan in early childhood. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 143–161). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Coplan, R. J., & Prakash, K. (2003). Spending time with teacher: Characteristics of preschoolers who frequently elicit versus initiate interactions with teachers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 143–158. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(03)00009-7
  • Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
  • Dafflon Novelle, A. (Ed.). (2006). Filles–garçons. Socialisation différenciée? [Girls and Boys. Differentiated Socialisation?] Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
  • Dardier, V. (2004). Pragmatique et pathologies. Comment étudier les troubles de l'usage du langage [Pragmatics and pathologies. How best to study disorders of language use]. Paris: Boréal.
  • Denham, S. A., Blair, K. A., DeMulder, E., Levitas, J., Sawyer, K., Auerbach, M. S., & Queenan, P. (2003). Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence. Child Development, 74, 238–256. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00533
  • Derman-Sparks, L., & The A.B.C. Task Force. (1989). Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empowering young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  • Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Lima, O. K., Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). The individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring System (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a system for observing preschoolers’ competence in classroom interaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.08.004
  • Dumont, M., Provost, M. A., & Dubé, M. (1990). La compétence sociale: Une approche multivariée [Social skills: A multivariate approach]. In M. A. Provost (Ed.), Le développement social des enfants: perceptives méthodologiques, théoriques et critiques [Social development among children: Methodological, theoretical and critical perspectives] (pp. 13–55). Montréal: Éditions Agence D'ARC.
  • Duru-Bellat, M. (1995). Filles et garçons à l’école, approches sociologiques et psychosociales [Girls and boys at school: Sociological and psychosocial approaches]. Revue française de pédagogie, 110, 75–109. doi: 10.3406/rfp.1995.1242
  • Duru-Bellat, M. (2008). La (re)production des rapports sociaux de sexe: Quelle place pour l'institution scolaire [The (re)production of gender relations: What role can educational institutions play?] Travail, genre et sociétés, 19(1), 131–149. doi: 10.3917/tgs.019.0131
  • Eagly, A., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
  • Eisenberg, N., Cameron, E., Tryon, K., & Dodez, R. (1981). Socialization of prosocial behavior in the preschool classroom. Developmental Psychology, 17, 773–782. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.773
  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3 (pp. 701–778). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3 (pp. 646–702). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S., & Guthrie, I. K. (1997). Social cognition and prosocial development. In S. Hala (Ed.), The development of social cognition (pp. 329–363). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987a). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987b). Empathy, sympathy and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 292–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Morris, A. S. (2013). Prosocial development. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 300–325). Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
  • Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1996). An examination of age and sex differences in prosocial behavior and empathy. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University at Tempe, Tempe.
  • Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2002, October). The role of sex segregation in young children‘s prosocial behavior and disposition. Paper presented at the Groningen Conference on Prosocial Disposition and Solidarity, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Gravel, F. (1997). La construction du caractère au cours de la jeune enfance [Character building in early childhood] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Greener, S. H. (2000). Peer assessment of children's prosocial behaviour. Journal of Moral Education, 2, 47–60. doi: 10.1080/030572400102925
  • Hirata, H., Laborie, F., Le Doaré, H., & Senotier, D. (2004). Dictionnaire critique du féminisme (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  • Honig, A. S. (1996). Early childhood education: Training for the future. Early Child Development and Care, 121(1), 135–145. doi: 10.1080/0300443961210111
  • Howes, C. (2011). Children's social development within the socialization context of child care and early childhood education. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development (pp. 242–262). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hurtig, M., Kail, M., & Rouch, H. (2002). Sexe et genre [Sex and gender] (Rev. ed.). Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
  • Hyson, M., & Taylor, J. L. (2011). Caring about caring: What adults can do to promote young children's prosocial skills. Young Children, 66(4), 74–83.
  • Janus, M., & Offord, D. R. (2000). Reporting on readiness to learn in Canada. ISUMA Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 1, 71–75.
  • Janus, M., & Offord, D. R. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): A measure of children's school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science – Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 39(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1037/cjbs2007001
  • Junttila, N., Voeten, M., Kaukiainen, A., & Vauras, M. (2006). Multisource assessment of children's social competence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(5), 874–895. doi: 10.1177/0013164405285546
  • Katz, L. G., & McClellan, D. E. (1997). Fostering children's social competence: The teacher's role. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  • Knafo, A. (2011, March). Developmental changes in prosocial behavior from 3.5 to 5 years: The roles of genetics and socialization. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Montréal, Canada.
  • Knafo, A., & Israel, S. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behaviour: The better angels of our nature (pp. 149–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children's peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Ladd, G. W., & Sechler, C. M. (2013). Young children's peer relations and social competence. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 33–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lafontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Development Psychology, 38, 635–647. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
  • Lahire, B. (2001). Héritage sexués: incorporation des habitudes et des croyances [Gendered inheritance: Incorporating habits and beliefs]. In T. Blöss (Ed.), La dialectique des rapports hommes-femmes [The dialectics of gender relations] (pp. 9–25). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  • Leaper, C., & Smith, T. E. (2004). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 993–1027. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.993
  • Lemerise, E. A. (1997). Patterns of peer acceptance, social status, and social reputation in mixed-age preschool and primary classrooms. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 199–218.
  • Lin, M., Lake, V. E., & Rice, D. (2008). Teaching anti-bias curriculum in teacher education programs: What and how. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 187–200.
  • Meisels, S. J., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2006). Evaluating early childhood assess-ments: A differential analysis. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Development (pp. 533–549). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Ministère de la Culture, des Communications et de la Condition Féminine. (2011). D’égal(e) à égaux. Pour la promotion de rapports égalitaires entre filles et garçons dans les services de garde éducatifs. Guide d'accompagnement [Peer-to-equal. For the promotion of egalitarian relationships between girls and boys in educational childcare. Accompanying guide]. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
  • Ministère de la Famille. (2013). Création de places en services de garde [Creation of childcare spaces]. Retrieved from http://www.mfa.gouv.qc.ca/fr/services-de-garde/portrait/places/Pages/index.aspx
  • Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés. (2007). Accueillir la petite enfance. Le programme éducatif des services de garde du Québec [Meeting early childhood needs. Quebec's educational program for childcare services]. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
  • Mosconi, N. (1992). Les ambiguïtés de la mixité scolaire [Ambiguities of co-ed schooling]. In C. Baudoux & C. Zaidman (Eds.), Égalité entre les sexes: mixité et démocratie [Gender equality: Diversity and democracy] (pp. 63–75). Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Mosconi, N. (1994). Femmes et Savoir. La société, l’école et la division sexuelle des savoirs [Women and knowledge: Society, school and sexual division of knowledge]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Mosconi, N. (1998). Réussite scolaire des filles et des garçons et socialisation différentielle des sexes à l’école [Academic achievement of girls and boys and differential gender socialization in school]. Recherches Féministes, 11(1), 7–17. doi: 10.7202/057964ar
  • Mosconi, N. (1999). Les recherches sur la socialisation différentielle des sexes à l’école [Research on differential gender socialization at school]. In D. Y. Lemel & B. Roudet (Eds.), Filles et garçons jusqu’à l'adolescence: socialisation différentielle [Girls and boys through to adolescence: Differential socialization] (pp. 85–115). Montréal: L'Harmattan.
  • Mosconi, N. (2001). Comment les pratiques enseignantes fabriquent de l'inégalité entre les sexes [How teachers’ practices create gender inequality]. Les Dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 5, 97–109.
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  • Murcier, N. (2007). La réalité de l’égalité entre les sexes à l’épreuve de la garde des jeunes enfants [The reality of gender equality put to the test in early childhood care]. Mouvement, 49, 53–62. doi: 10.3917/mouv.049.0053
  • Nantel-Vivier, A., Kokko, K., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., Gerbino, M. G., Paciello, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Prosocial development from childhood to adolescence: A multi-informant perspective with Canadian and Italian longitudinal studies. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 590–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02039.x
  • O'Neil, D. K. (2007). The language use inventory for young children: A parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 214–228. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/017)
  • Pagé, P. (1995). Analyse socio-écologique des modes de pensée sociale du jeune enfant [Socio-ecological analysis of social thought patterns among young children] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Pagé, P., & Gravel, F. (1998). La modulation de la pensée sociale chez l'enfant d'âge préscolaire et la qualité de son adaptation socioscolaire [Modulation of social thinking in preschoolers and quality of their social and school adaptation]. Unpublished manuscript, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
  • Pakaslahti, L., Karjalainen, A., & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2002). Relationships between adolescent prosocial problem-solving strategies, prosocial behaviour, and social acceptance. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 26, 137–144. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000681
  • Pelletier, D., Vitaro, F., & Coutu, S. (1991). Évaluation socio-cognitive et comportementale de la capacité de résoudre des problèmes sociaux chez des enfants agressifs-rejetés et prosociaux-populaires [Socio-cognitive and behavioural assessment of the ability to solve social problems among aggressive-rejected and prosocial-popular children]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23(1), 84–98. doi: 10.1037/h0079001
  • Phillipsen, L. C., Bridges, S. K., McLemore, T. G., & Sapanaro, L. A. (1999). Perceptions of social behavior and peer acceptance in kindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 68–77. doi: 10.1080/02568549909594753
  • Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of boys' friendships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 233–240. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.233
  • Prutting, C. A. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47(2), 123–134.
  • Renk, K., & Phares, V. (2004). Cross-informant ratings of social competence in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(2), 239–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.01.004
  • Rivers, S. E., Tominey, S. L., O'Bryon, E. C., & Brackett, M. A. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on social and emotional learning in early education. Early Education and Development, 24, 953–959. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2013.825364
  • Rose, A. J., & Smith, R. L. (2009). Sex differences in peer relationships. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 379–393). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1973). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils‘ intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg, D. William, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3 (6th ed., pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), The handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 619–700). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Shigetomi, C. C., Hartmann, D. P., & Gelfand, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in children's altruistic behavior and reputations for helpfulness. Developmental Psychology, 17, 434–437. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.434
  • Spinrad, T. L., & Eisenberg, N. (2009). Empathy, prosocial behavior, and positive development in the schools. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools (pp. 119–130). New-York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1974). Preschool interpersonal problem-solving (PIPS) manual. Philadelphia, PA: Department of Mental Health Sciences, Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital.
  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. S. (1982). The generality of altruism in children. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 25–52). New-York, NY: Academy Press.
  • UNESCO. (2012). Atlas mondial des inégalités de genre dans l’éducation [World atlas of gender equality in education]. Paris: Éditions UNESCO.
  • Vitaro, F. (2009, November). Liens entre les dimensions socio-comportementales à la maternelle et la réussite scolaire ultérieure [Relationships between socio-behavioural dimensions in kindergarten and later academic achievement]. Paper presented at the conference ‘Préparation et réussite scolaire ultérieure: De la recherche aux pratiques et aux politiques’ [School readiness and later achievement: From research to practice to policies], Québec, Canada.
  • Vitaro, F., & Brendgen, M. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A developmental perspective. In R. Tremblay, W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 178–201). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Vitaro, F., Brengden, M., Larose, S., & Tremblay, R. (2005). Kindergarten disruptive behaviours, protective factors, and educational achievement by early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 617–629. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.617
  • Vitiello, V. E., Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Williford, A. P. (2012). Variation in children's classroom engagement throughout a day in preschool: Relations to classroom and child factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.005
  • Warden, D., Christie, D., Kerr, C., & Low, J. (1996). Children's prosocial and antisocial behavior, as perceived by children, parents and teachers. Educational Psychology, 16, 365–378. doi: 10.1080/0144341960160402
  • Warden, D., & MacKinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Development Psychology, 21, 367–385. doi: 10.1348/026151003322277757
  • Waters, E., Hay, D., & Richter, J. (1986). Infant-parent attachment and the origins of prosocial and antisocial behavior. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior: Research, theories and issues (pp. 97–125). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Winer, A. C., & Thompson, R. A. (2011, March). Origins of individual differences in prosocial dispositions: Preschoolers. Poster session presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Montréal, Canada.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.